Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Quim Gil
On 4/22/07, Kevin Harriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, if anybody knows any gnome devs that in the chicagoland area that might be interested in this group could you pass this information GNOMErs with access to planet.gnome.org could help. I don't mind do it myself although perhaps US based

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Kevin, Kevin Harriss wrote: My name is Kevin Harriss and I am new to this list was just wondering if anybody was interested in joining/helping out a Gnome User Group based in Chicago, Illinois in the United States. I was looking at the list of Gnome User Groups and noticed that there was

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: I don't think so. Nobody has really ever started a user group. Us Europeans, South Americans and Asians have a bunch of them: http://live.gnome.org/UserGroups Then I start formulating some goals: I think while all of these are great, they're aiming too high for

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Thilo, Thilo Pfennig wrote: a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing list. Such major things and announcement have to be discussed with at least the marketing team snip we are going into new directions without further consultation of the marketing team.

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Lucas Rocha
Hi, Wow, Dave, I was just going to write most of the things you wrote in this message. Thank you for saving me time and energy. :-P --lucasr 2007/4/23, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Thilo, Thilo Pfennig wrote: a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Joachim
On 4/23/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Thilo, Thilo Pfennig wrote: a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing list. Such major things and announcement have to be discussed with at least the marketing team snip we are going into new directions

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Alex Hudson
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:45 +0100, Joachim wrote: Anyway, while Thilo leaves (and I don't blame him at all), I'm going to ask this: Could the Foundation board decide whether Gnome needs a marketing team? Could it either explicitly give a mandate to the marketing team or let us know if we

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Joachim Like someone else said, it's a chicken and egg situation. It's not: Go and do something awesome! This latest announcement seems to have come from quite high up in Gnome -- Foundation board members are involved in it, I would image. I started it independently of the Board,

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:45 +0100, Joachim wrote: This latest announcement seems to have come from quite high up in Gnome -- Foundation board members are involved in it, I would image. If even they can't be bothered to at least include the marketing team in the loop, what hope is there?

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Joachim
On 4/23/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quote who=Joachim Like someone else said, it's a chicken and egg situation. It's not: Go and do something awesome! Jeff, your communications would sound more sincere and less glib if you stopped loading them with meaningless words like

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Joachim Jeff, your communications would sound more sincere and less glib if you stopped loading them with meaningless words like 'rock' 'awesome' and the like. Tough. That's the way I talk. Because someone -- I forget who, can't see to check, hate mailing lists, pointed out the

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Quim Gil
Thanks Dave for being brave. Your email hurts. I like it. No pain, no cure? From the Personas project to the CMS election and everything in between (release notes, GNOME Office, GNOME slogan...) I personally got tired of investing more time in discussion than production. It's not funny anymore

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Joachim
On 4/23/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dave for being brave. Your email hurts. I like it. No pain, no cure? From the Personas project to the CMS election and everything in between (release notes, GNOME Office, GNOME slogan...) I personally got tired of investing more time in

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Joachim
On 4/23/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quote who=Joachim Jeff, your communications would sound more sincere and less glib if you stopped loading them with meaningless words like 'rock' 'awesome' and the like. Tough. That's the way I talk. Fair enough. I suppose that's just a

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:45 +0100, Joachim wrote: [snip] I only found out there was a new design for the control panel by chance, This is really an issue for the release-team, I think. They might have ideas about how to keep documentation writers updated about UI and feature changes during that

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:00 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: One thing I was majorly disappointed with was the release of 2.18: there is a huge perception that GNOME hasn't moved forward from 2.12/2.14 in any significant way. The release notes were crappy, that's all. (Gervais Mulongoy and Quim and

Re: About standards

2007-04-23 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:52 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 23:59 +0300, Quim Gil wrote: On 4/1/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are a few. Thanks! These go into really technical details (as it should be for that page). I have ended up doing

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Joachim wrote: No, what I was asking was for the board and perhaps the whole of Gnome to say whether it needs a marketing team, and what it wants it to do. Personally, I think that GNOME needs better marketing and promotion. There are two ways that can happen - ad hoc, where people who

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:53 +0100, Joachim wrote: [snip] board and perhaps the whole of Gnome to say whether it needs a marketing team, and what it wants it to do. [snip] I believe Dave Neary has just answered that (again) in this thread. Isn't that enough? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Joachim Fair enough. I suppose that's just a cultural difference between us, because to me those sorts of words make me think what I'm hearing is buzzword laden bullshit that dodges the issues at hand. But that's one of the unique parameter we have to work with, right? Perhaps this

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Alex Hudson
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:59 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:00 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: One thing I was majorly disappointed with was the release of 2.18: there is a huge perception that GNOME hasn't moved forward from 2.12/2.14 in any significant way. The release

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:19 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: [snip] I think release notes are great for existing users; I don't think they pull in many new users, and my point was really more about the latter I guess: I think it should be a function of the marketing team to help create buzz about

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Alex Hudson
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:24 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: Yes (no need for people to point out that selling == marketing. It's still a useful job to do.). That's why I'd like people to work on the GNOME Tour, which I started but never finished. It's also in the gnomeweb-wml module. Totally

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:24 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:19 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: [snip] I think release notes are great for existing users; I don't think they pull in many new users, and my point was really more about the latter I guess: I think it should be a

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
In a nutshell, looking from long time GNOME user POV, marketing team for GNOME project is essential, but real results are needed to gain any respect/response: * Release notes - already lot of people complaining on lot of sites - slashdot.org, osnews.com - about lack of quality in last release

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Patrick Wagstrom
Dave Neary wrote: Hi Kevin, Kevin Harriss wrote: My name is Kevin Harriss and I am new to this list was just wondering if anybody was interested in joining/helping out a Gnome User Group based in Chicago, Illinois in the United States. I was looking at the list of Gnome User Groups and

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Patrick Wagstrom wrote: Dave Neary wrote: Great! There's also a biggish GNOME presence elsewhere in the mid-west, in Ohio and Michigan. You might consider widening the scope a little (or is that too wide of a scope? From where I am, distance between US cities is measured in centimeters).

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Paul Cutler
I'm also watching Kevin's attempts to get a GNOME group going. I'm in Minneapolis, MN, and we're just getting our LUG going again (www.tclug.org, horribly out of date), which I'm involved with as well. Depending on the turnout of the next couple of meetings we have, I'm hoping to survey how many

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi (again) Patrick, Patrick Wagstrom wrote: 1. Identify a starting group of 6 or 8 people who will give you some initial momentum (the GNOME map moght help with this: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide) Is there a way to make this a higher resolution map? While it's cool and all that,

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 23 avril 2007, à 11:56, Murray Cumming a écrit : On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:45 +0100, Joachim wrote: [snip] I only found out there was a new design for the control panel by chance, This is really an issue for the release-team, I think. They might have ideas about how to keep

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:41:56AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: Hi, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: I don't think so. Nobody has really ever started a user group. Us Europeans, South Americans and Asians have a bunch of them: http://live.gnome.org/UserGroups Coolness! Then I start

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:41:56AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote: Aren't there conferences in the mid-west already? There's OLS, of course, but I'm sure there are conferences in Michigan and Illinois as well. I think OLS is in Canada right? I was thinking of the

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Shaun McCance
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 17:04 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: In that area, you have (correct me if I'm wrong) the following major cities: Chicago Columbus Cleveland Milwaukee Indianapolis Des Moines That's 6 major urban areas - I imagine that each of those has their own LUG, and that from each

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Patrick Wagstrom
I think OLS is in Canada right? It's close to Michigan but probably a little too far for most other people. There is one held in Detroit I believe that Jorge actively participates in, Penguicon I believe. I agree that having a GNOME conference is probably a bit too much. We aren't that big.

Re: About The GNOME Mobile Embedded Initative

2007-04-23 Thread Gezim Hoxha
On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 15:59 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote: In a nutshell, looking from long time GNOME user POV, marketing team for GNOME project is essential, but real results are needed to gain any respect/response: * Release notes - already lot of people complaining on lot of sites -

Re-inventing the GNOME Marketing team

2007-04-23 Thread Ken VanDine
Based on the feedback the GMAE thread, let me suggest we re-invent ourselves. I think it is obvious we are needed, but right now we really don't have a direction. Let's fix this! We have the power to do it... we just need to do it. Let's organize a brain storming session to get the ball

Re: Starting Chicago Gnome User Group

2007-04-23 Thread Kevin Harriss
Here's my plug for Ohio Linux Fest too. It's gonna rock. Last year we broke the 1000 person barrier and had live nude penguins (jackass penguins at that!). We could use some GNOMErs to help me work the booth and do some talks at the conference. In particular, lots of people liked bling,