Steve,
Well, now I know what comes after the snip.
First paragraph:
Oudeyis is saying nothing about what nature is, but rather is writing that
whatever understandings man has of nature are a function primarily of his
active interaction (his labour) with the natural conditions of his
existence
-Thaxis]
Oudeyis
-clip-
Describing
their accomplishment in a dialectical form, the materialism of Marx,
Engels
and Lenin is not a statement about the world but about the unity of
logical
and physical and sensual activity in human labour (practice).
NOTE, THAT THE ISSUE OF THE RELEVANCE
is identical with the totality of
nature or that our activity in nature involves nature as a whole.
Regards,
Oudeyis
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http
. . .
At 07:09 AM 5/26/2005 +0200, Oudeyis wrote:
In regards to this thread on emergence and dialectics:
Your discussion (the whole thread) on dialectics and emergence conflates
several contradictory objectives: the dialectics of dialectics, i.e. the
essence of emergence in Marxist theory
The best material for learning what's happening in the world is published by
and for businessmen and policy makers. One of my favourites is newnations
bulletin, but this from Global Policy Forum (just came across it in my
files) is most relevant to the Ollmen's article. The strategic context of
- Original Message -
From: A. Mani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:27 PM
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Re: Marxism-Thaxis Digest, Vol 18, Issue 4
Re : 1. Re: A. Mani : Re : 2/3rd ... (Oudeyis)
Greetings,
I have considerable doubts
- Original Message -
From: Fred Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: standard [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gleft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 107 [EMAIL PROTECTED];
snews [EMAIL PROTECTED]; change
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; rad [EMAIL PROTECTED];
marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu; PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU; 620
[EMAIL
?
Oudeyis victor
CB: I think Hegel mentions math and jurisprudence as prime areas of
the
operation of formal logic.
VFR: True enough, but I've a strong feeling that there's more to the
lawlessness of laws and constitutions than formal logic.
^^
CB: I'm curious to hear your
- Original Message -
From: Ralph Dumain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] More Godel
First of all, the theories of knowledge of Engels and Lenin lack the
specificity to grapple with axiomatic
- Original Message -
From: Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx
andthe thinkers he inspired' marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:30 PM
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Does Gödel Matter?
comprehensive field.
While many of the ideas adumbrated in this review seem to be quite
fruitful, this paragraph is the tipoff that something is rotten in the
state of Denmark.
At 05:28 PM 3/4/2005 +0200, Oudeyis wrote:
Have been following your discussion with considerable interest
- Original Message -
From: Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx
andthe thinkers he inspired' marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:44 PM
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Van Heijenoort's critique of
Jim,
To my knowledge Maynard Smith is, or rather was (he died recently 19th of
April 2004), a Marxist.
The subjects in the Fall 1998 issue of SCIENCE SOCIETY are exactly those
I'm currently wrestling with. Is there any way that I can get copies of
those articles.
Many thanks,
Victor
-
Have been following your discussion with considerable interest. Sorry
to lurk so long, but I was occupied in finishing up a paper.
I was particularly interested in your earlier discussion on emergence.
I agree strongly with Jay Gould that dialectics; Hegelian and Marxist alike,
Jim,
Thanks,
I'm sending this to some of my New Socialism friends for a response.
Regards,
Victor
- Original Message -
From: Jim Farmelant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 3:00 AM
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Ideology and Economic Development (Monthly Review)
Steve,
Well-met.
First time I came across Ilyenkov was in Mandel's. Mandel wasn't very
enthusiastic about his work - more or less regarded Ilyenkov as just another
Stalinist apologist. In the course of reviewing Marxist theory and its
relation to Vygotsky's work, about two years ago, I happened
Sorry forgot the references!
Steve,Well-met.First time I came across Ilyenkov was in Mandel's
The formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx. Mandel wasn't
veryenthusiastic about his work - more or less regarded Ilyenkov as just
anotherStalinist apologist. In the course of reviewing
Jim,
Thanks for the reference.
I'm well acquainted with Bakehurst and Jones's writings on Ilyenkov, but
much less familiar with the works of the Japanese School. I expect reading
it will be an interesting experience.
Regards,
Victor
- Original Message -
From: Jim Farmelant [EMAIL
18 matches
Mail list logo
