Re: [masq] [masq] Problem with rc.local

1998-08-28 Thread Charles Shoemaker
I put those kinds of lines in /etc/bashrc. Date: Thu, 27 Aug 98 14:32:17 -0400 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Joe Duncan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [masq] Problem with rc.local the lines are: alias ls='ls

Re: [masq] Which distribution for LRP / IP Masq projects?

1998-08-28 Thread Joe Duncan
Which distribution to go with, is I believe, a matter of personal taste. I have worked with two personally, Slackware and Red Hat. The version of Slackware I had was a bit older, but overall I like Red Hat better. Red Hat 5.0 comes with many of the kernel modules already created and

[masq] ICQ Chat (was: Problem with rc.local)

1998-08-28 Thread Joe Duncan
Ok, I've solved the rc.local problem, my system works fine, and seeing as how the list seems to have been inundated with off-topic postings on the subject I'd ask that we kill that thread. On to some on-topic IP Masq. stuff. Everything seemed to work fine at first and all the guides I've

Re: [masq] Which distribution for LRP / IP Masq projects?

1998-08-28 Thread David A. Ranch
OK, here's my question: For this application - a router box with IP MASQ capabilities, which distribution should I start with. I hope I'm not boring everyone on the list with this, But... the intro to TrinityOS goes over this in good detail. Give it a look!

Re: [masq] [masq] ICQ Chat (was: Problem with rc.local)

1998-08-28 Thread zeit
ICQ works fine for me (RH5.1) ICQ settings: -I'm using a permanent connection -I am behind a firewall firewall settings: -I don't use a socks server zeit http://204.83.206.89/~zeit/ -Original Message- From: Joe Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [masq] Which distribution for LRP / IP Masq projects?

1998-08-28 Thread Andrew L. Davis
On Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 09:26:49AM -0400, Joe Duncan wrote: Which distribution to go with, is I believe, a matter of personal taste. I have worked with two personally, Slackware and Red Hat. The version of Slackware I had was a bit older, but overall I like Red Hat better. Red Hat

Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] [masq] ICQ Chat (was: Problem with rc.local)

1998-08-28 Thread Pete
receive incoming connections). The best solution, and the only way to achieve full functionality of ICQ behind a Masq box, is to install a SOCKS5 proxy server on your Masq firewall. Then you can tell ICQ that you have a SOCKS5 proxy server and it will work 100%. I was pointed to this answer

Re: [masq] sendmail-problem with attchmnt with more than 5kB

1998-08-28 Thread Fuzzy Fox
Carsten Otto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find out, that it is not due to binary attachments that sendmail hangs, because it does not send any attachments larger than 5kB. And the errormessage in /var/log/maillog says that it timed out. Is there a better way to debug ??? Hmmm. Times out on

Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] ICQ Chat (was: Problem with rc.local)

1998-08-28 Thread Frode Hauge
You can get 100% functionality without that. Forward a set of ports to the machine you intend to run ICQ on (assuming you have a simple setup where it's mainly to be run from 1 machine behind the masq). Then set ICQ up to go through a firewall using those specific ports. Voila, filereceive, chat

Re: [masq] Problem with rc.local

1998-08-28 Thread Jose M. Sanchez
Actually these are two seperate problems... 1) You are attempting to execute ipfwadm during the boot process from within rc.local. While there is nothing wrong with this, the full path to the program MUST be specified. Normally this shell script gets executed BEFORE search paths are set...

[masq] sendmail-problem with attchmnt with more than 5kB

1998-08-28 Thread Carsten Otto
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Fuzzy Fox wrote: This is the preamble of the connection, and it's good. There are no errors here; sendmail accepted the message. So, it must be when sendmail tried to route the message from there, that something went wrong. Check the log file for the reason. My

Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] [masq] ICQ Chat (was: Problem with rc.local)

1998-08-28 Thread jekra
Exactly how would one go about doing that? You can get 100% functionality without that. Forward a set of ports to the machine you intend to run ICQ on (assuming you have a simple setup where it's mainly to be run from 1 machine behind the masq). Then set ICQ up to go through a firewall using

Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] [masq] [masq] ICQ Chat (was: Problem with rc.local)

1998-08-28 Thread Pete
Exactly how would one go about doing that? You can use ipautofw for that - check out http://masqapps.home.ml.org, it's explained there. I prefer the SOCKS5 solution tho. Regards, Pete - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL