Re: [mico-devel] Problems compiling mico

2008-11-06 Thread Andreas Benzler
to solve the problem. By the way, I compiled mico 2.3.13 a couple of days ago myself on a kubuntu 8.10 without any problems, but I hav not checked which gcc version it was exactly. Andreas Benzler In file included from ../include/CORBA.h:280, from ../include/CORBA

Re: [mico-devel] Problems compiling mico

2008-11-07 Thread Andreas Benzler
I have to correct my last post a bit. As I wrote I installed MICO 2.3.13 on Kubuntu 8.10 without problems I did not mention that I had to apply the patch that was posted on this list to avoid the error 'fast_array.cc:51: error: 'UINT_MAX' was not declared in this scope' I had a look about the gcc

[mico-devel] Problems using Objects of type Any and Qt

2008-12-03 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hallo, I´m using a client-server model based on Mico and I defined an idl interface like this: interface ifRec { long Register( in string name, in string ns ); void WriteData( in long id, in any data ); void SetEnv( in string Key, in string Value ); void Rec();

[mico-devel] How to compile mico with externalize enabled?

2009-01-09 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hi all I would like to compile mico 2.3.13 with externalize support but all I got was a lot of errors. I tried different configurations to solve the problem but nothing worked out. Does some of you could manage to compile mico with externalize support? Here is what I did: first try: ./configure

Re: [mico-devel] How to compile mico with externalize enabled?

2009-01-12 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hi Karel Thank for your fast info. Currently my time is very limited and I do not work on mico stuff in the first place, so I am sorry but I probably won't have the time to help out here. The reason I looked at the externalize service was that we encountered problems to serialize mico objects in

Re: [mico-devel] Why is CosEventComm::PushConsumer_skel no longer generated in 2.3.13?

2009-01-16 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hi Klaus I am highly interested in your approach bringing mico 2.3.11 to a gcc4.3 platform. Can you please describe a bit more detail what you did exactly. I am not an automake expert :-(. If you could make a patch available for 2.3.11 it would be even better... Regards Andreas Benzler