-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 3, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] rel-tag for hierarchical categories
To: Danny Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Microformats Discuss microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Danny, microformatters,
I
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 08:03:06 +0100, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that dot ('.') makes a decent hierarchy marker with no required
change for flat tag systems. Foxilicious [1] uses dot as a default
delimiter for converting from the (mostly) flat tag space at del.icio.us
to
On 12/3/05, Kevin Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, tagspaces are meant to be flat. If you want hierarchy you need
something else.
I'm not sure flat is quite the right word.
If you tag say a blog entry with software and httpsubscription,
the individual relationships are:
entry taggedWith
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Some parsers will still treat that as a single tag, but others
will treat it as a hierarchy, and even in those systems treating
it as a single tag, I think software.httpsubscription suggests a
hierarchy to many humans.
It won't be cool for those people who use
G'day,
I'm wanting to use tags as part of my blog entry posts, but I don't like
explicit tagging. I just want a single link at the bottom of each blog
entry to point to its category, and for that to be interpreted as one or
more tags.
Now, rel-tag appears to do the right thing for:
a
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:38 PM, Benjamin Carlyle wrote:
I'm wanting to use tags as part of my blog entry posts, but I don't
like
explicit tagging. I just want a single link at the bottom of each blog
entry to point to its category, and for that to be interpreted as one
or
more tags.
Now,
