On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
Martin, can you post some markup for the same 5 examples above using
your proposal?
Yeah, I'd like that too, Martin. It seems to me you're making
several proposals at once, and I'm not able to conceptually separate
them enough to understand
Hello Scott I have been thinking recently that it is perhaps best
to use
something that everyone is familiar with *FN* but I thought that it
would be simpler just to use *track* to imply type and title I also
don't think it is best practice to embed haudios *inside* haudio, I
think of it like a
Hello Scott, Manu, Julian...
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 00:18 -0600, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:39 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
Martin, can you post some markup for the same 5 examples above using
your proposal?
Yeah, I'd like that too, Martin. It seems to me you're making
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Single Track album known
span class=haudio
span class=item trackNagasaki Nightmare/span
span class=albumBest Before 1984/span
span class=contributorCrass/span
/span
What is item telling us there, that track
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 11:06 +0100, Julian Stahnke wrote:
Hello Scott I have been thinking recently that it is perhaps best
to use
something that everyone is familiar with *FN* but I thought that it
would be simpler just to use *track* to imply type and title I also
don't think it is
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 15:32 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote:
Album with a couple of tracks, more detailed:
span class=haudio
span class=albumBest Before 1984/span
span class=contributorCrass/span
span class=itemspan class=fnNagasaki Nightmare/
span – abbr class=duration
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Martin McEvoy wrote:
Why is track nested in item in the latter example, but not the
former?
where Item only has a single property it can be used:
span class=item fnNagasaki Nightmare/span
of course you can do it like this,
span class=itemspan class=fnNagasaki
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:00 AM, Martin McEvoy wrote:
works for me too but without the haudio on every item,
Please respond to the concerns Manu and I already raised about this,
which I've updated below with our current naming preferences:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:13 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
On
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
l
span class=l
line and span class=line would be better.
--
Andy Mabbett
___
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 09:50 -0600, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Martin McEvoy wrote:
Why is track nested in item in the latter example, but not the
former?
where Item only has a single property it can be used:
span class=item fnNagasaki Nightmare/span
of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Single Track album known
span class=haudio
span class=item fnNagasaki Nightmare/span
span class=albumBest Before 1984/span
span class=contributorCrass/span
/span
What is item telling us there, that fn isn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Many of us on the list agree with Tantek (including Me) that we SHOULD
use FN, the trouble is Some on the list want to use *Track* and
*audio-title* or *recording* because they believe the properties we are
trying to describe
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I think we should resolve the abbr-accessibility elephant in the
room,
once and for all, before introducing any new mis-uses of abbr. After
all, it was identified over a
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 17:30 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Many of us on the list agree with Tantek (including Me) that we SHOULD
use FN, the trouble is Some on the list want to use *Track* and
*audio-title* or *recording*
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 17:13 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes (corrected per his follow-up)
4:46, in plain English, is not an abbreviation of P268T.
No you are correct it isn't It needs changing.
would this work:
abbr
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 17:16 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Single Track album known
span class=haudio
span class=item fnNagasaki Nightmare/span
span class=albumBest Before 1984/span
span
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Item is semantically empty, other than as a container. We might as well
say thing.
what is a track on your CD? Just a space, gap or marker nothing more
On the contrary, it has a distinct meaning, which defines it as being
Just to try and Outline the current thinking on hAudio
Manu's proposed *album* and *recording* properties
Album we can all agree on?
Manu later changed his support to FN instead of Recording
which is something else we can all agree on?
I am proposing that we re-use *item* from hListing,
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 19:47 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Item is semantically empty, other than as a container. We might as
well
say thing.
what is a track on your CD? Just a space, gap or marker nothing more
On the
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 20:01 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote:
span class=albumBest Before 1984/spanAny concerns should be
raised now
span class=contributorCrass/span
WTF Any concerns should be raised now should have been at the bottom
of my email!!
Oh well that's Evolution for you :)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am proposing that we re-use *item* from hListing, hReview and hItem
instead of creating another microformat *track* the status of this is
still unknown
Does this sit well with everybody?
No. You seem to have overlooked
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 20:32 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am proposing that we re-use *item* from hListing, hReview and hItem
instead of creating another microformat *track* the status of this is
still unknown
Does this
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 19:47 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Item is semantically empty, other than as a container. We might as
well
say thing.
what is a
UPDATE on current Thinking on hAudio
@Manu we need your input on this
[1] Single Track album known
span class=haudio
span class=track
span class=fnNagasaki Nightmare/span
/span
span class=albumBest Before 1984/span
span class=contributorCrass/span
/span
...
Anyway there is only Me at the moment supporting using *item*
instead of
a new microformat *track*
Nope, I too think item would be better. Maybe, if it is too
meaningless, together with haudio à la span class=item haudio. I
don’t know enough about item to say if just item is enough, but I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[1] Single Track album known
span class=haudio
span class=track
span class=fnNagasaki Nightmare/span
/span
span class=albumBest Before 1984/span
span class=contributorCrass/span /span
[5]
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 21:31 +0100, Julian Stahnke wrote:
Anyway there is only Me at the moment supporting using *item*
instead of
a new microformat *track*
Nope, I too think item would be better. Maybe, if it is too
meaningless, together with haudio à la span class=item haudio. I
How would these work, for tracks on a compilation album, by different
artists? Or tracks on a one-album artist, but where one features a
guest
vocalist?
Would have no contributor in the haudio thing but only in the items.
The latter would have an additional contributor in the respective
On 10/13/07 12:48 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 19:47 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin
McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Item is semantically empty, other
29 matches
Mail list logo
