On Jan 1, 2008 4:28 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard, since you are a hypocrite who won't read web pages,
Richard please switch from you demoniac way of reading web pages
fetching them with wget and so on as you said and act normal. There
are a whole lot of people who are at
Aparently difficult and interesting questions don't get answers until
they're posted to a list..
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of Open-Hardware.26774DEFANGED-eml]
Vijay Sankar mrta:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:25:02PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:25:25AM -0800, Jon wrote:
hi
I see a lot of programs that are available to clean up the disks for
Windows OS. Not wipe a disk but clean up deleted files so they cannot be
recovered.
Is there
Paul Greidanus wrote:
Aparently difficult and interesting questions don't get answers until
they're posted to a list..
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of Open-Hardware.26774DEFANGED-eml]
And it would have worked better if I included the
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:53:29PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
Is there anything up with newer versions then? Why should it not be
brought up to date?
i believe license is the issue.
Correct. Newer version of fvwm are GPLed..
--
Alas, I am dying beyond my means.
-- Oscar
I'm curious how you can recomend an OS, like gNewSense that only runs on
non-free hardware, that
has required non-free software to be used in it's creation?
How do you do these things? Perhaps I do them the same way.
The term non-free hardware is misleading, because the issues that
Here is the real issue, Richard. You go off and endorse OpenSolaris
without knowing the facts. You get confronted with them and you change
history. Sound familiar?
What sounds familiar is the nasty spin you place on a minor confusion.
But you have added a new false accusation of
Here is the real issue, Richard. You go off and endorse OpenSolaris
without knowing the facts. You get confronted with them and you change
history. Sound familiar?
What sounds familiar is the nasty spin you place on a minor confusion.
We are not spinning any facts.
Richard,
Richard Stallman wrote:
There are no copiers for hardware and it has no source code.
You might visit a foundry.
They've been around for rather a long time.
Take a look at a dressmaker's pattern ...
On 2008/01/01 13:27, Daniel wrote:
there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to backport.
Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
Well, you mentioned one reason why not just upgrade:
With openldap-2.4, one can not use the ldbm backend anymore, but
There are a small number of people that command respect in the IT industry
and as far as I know, Richard and Theo are two such people. I am sure that
if people like you began to endorse open source hardware more people would
move in that direction. I remember reading a quote from Sun about
On 1/1/08 8:42 PM, Paul Greidanus wrote:
Aparently difficult and interesting questions don't get answers until
they're posted to a list..
I believe your questions were not very interesting for OpenBSD, that is about
a code base with absolute freedom, no strings attached.
For most OpenBSD
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 04:24:06PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
Here is the real issue, Richard. You go off and endorse OpenSolaris
without knowing the facts. You get confronted with them and you change
history. Sound familiar?
What sounds familiar is the nasty spin you
Most of us on this list are happy to see software and hardware that
is open source.
Might i most respectfully suggest that this is not the best venue to
promote this. We agree on a lot of points.
Dr Stallman i now see the dogged determination that has made you effective,
however i have to
On 1/1/08 10:35 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
As for Intels use of non-free software, I am sorry for them, and I hope
that someday they will be able to move to free software.
Is this hope reasonable or logical?
Totally not. Intel just wants the best software they can afford to get their
chips
Richard Stallman wrote:
I'm curious how you can recomend an OS, like gNewSense that only runs on
non-free hardware, that
has required non-free software to be used in it's creation?
How do you do these things? Perhaps I do them the same way.
The term non-free hardware is
On Jan 1, 2008, at 6:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr Stallman i now see the dogged determination that has made you
effective,
He's not a doctor. In any sense of the word. Honorary degrees don't
give you the right to use the title or to be called by it.
--- Marina Brown
Return-Path:
Paul Greidanus wrote:
Hi Richard,
I've been marginally following the discussion on OpenBSD and FSF and
of the noise related.
Speaking of FSF.. What if I want to start MY OWN foundation that
guarantees 7 freedoms, or 2 freedoms according to my personal opinion
and philosophy on freedom?
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0500, Christopher Linn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:25:02PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:25:25AM -0800, Jon wrote:
I see a lot of programs that are available to clean up the disks for
Windows OS. Not wipe a disk but
Still recoverable. I have dealt with pretty badly burnt disks that we
recovered data off. Really the grinder is the way to go.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0500, Christopher Linn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:25:02PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:25:25AM
Anyone in the process of porting over k9copy from the freebsd ports tree?
Thanks,
Brian
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:27:59PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Still recoverable. I have dealt with pretty badly burnt disks that we
recovered data off. Really the grinder is the way to go.
Thermite should do the work too. Hot enough to bring the material out of
the ferromagnetic
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:43:01PM -0800, Brian wrote:
Anyone in the process of porting over k9copy from the freebsd ports tree?
hmm, requires libhal and vamps. vamps only requantizes the mpeg
stream. tcrequant from the transcode package can requantize mpeg
streams. IIRC, vamps is based on
Richard Stallman wrote:
I'm curious how you can recomend an OS, like gNewSense that only runs on
non-free hardware, that
has required non-free software to be used in it's creation?
How do you do these things? Perhaps I do them the same way.
I don't, however, I don't claim to
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:27:43PM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:53:29PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
Is there anything up with newer versions then? Why should it not be
brought up to date?
i believe license is the issue.
Correct. Newer version of fvwm are
So I have spent some large portion of today puzzling over getting
php5 to work. This is on a i386-current system with packages
compiled from the ports tree as of 12/29.
Php5 installs just fine, and in fact running the test.php code in
a index.php file works if I go to
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, STeve Andre' wrote:
So I have spent some large portion of today puzzling over getting
php5 to work. This is on a i386-current system with packages
compiled from the ports tree as of 12/29.
Php5 installs just fine, and in fact running the test.php code in
a index.php
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
To satisfy my own curiosity, looking at
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_X_window_managers which provides
links to 45 window managers for which there are wiki pages, I looked at
the licence for each and found that only xmonad, wmii, fluxbox, and
blackbox
On 2/01/2008, at 6:28 PM, Antti Harri wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, STeve Andre' wrote:
However I can't use imbedded php like
? require_once('header.php'); ?
Use ?php ?
so I'm missing something and I haven't found what it is after a lot
of looking around. Can someone point me
On 28/12/2007, at 12:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all.
I've finally found some time to try and get a tape drive - Seagate
STT3401A (now
Certance/Quantum) - working on a Dell SC440.
[cut]
mt rewind
will log this (/var/log/messages):
/bsd: wdc_atapi_intr: warning: reading only 255
31 matches
Mail list logo
