I MIME::Lite to send messages. It uses your native sendmail install, or you can use it
to send to an SMPT port. We actually have Qmail installed and it use the sendmail link
Qmail configs and works just fine for about 40k emails a day.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Clarke
Thanks, Iain! This helps explain some problems I ran into when I tried to use
Switch. ;-) Wish the Switch docs included some caveats about using it with
mod_perl
Wes Sheldahl
Iain Truskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/21/2002 11:10:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Wesley
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/22/02 09:15:23 -0400
Thanks, Iain! This helps explain some problems I ran into when I tried to use
Switch. ;-) Wish the Switch docs included some caveats about using it with
mod_perl
Switch, Multifiles, Q::S, and A::B all have a Caveat Utilitor
note in them.
At my former employer's, we built an Enterprise Management System out of
mod_perl. He wants to distribute it to clients w/o risking theft of his
code.
--Jon R.
PGP Key fingerprint = 12 DA FC 06 AB 4C D6 A4 DE 03 E0 77 D6 DE E0 73
PGP public key available by fingering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon,
At my former employer's, we built an Enterprise Management System out of
mod_perl. He wants to distribute it to clients w/o risking theft of his
code.
If w/o risking theft means eliminating risk of theft, then he can't
do it. He can lower risk to some degree, but it can't be eliminated.
See
Hi!
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 10:58:24PM -0400, Jonathon M. Robison wrote:
Anyone know offhand a good way to hide your perl code when using
mod_perl? Acme::Bleach isn't doing it - httpd is failing to start on
You could write an obfuscator. Maybe Acme::EyeDrop works?
See
Hi
( 02.07.22 10:15 -0400 ) Jon:
At my former employer's, we built an Enterprise Management System out of
mod_perl. He wants to distribute it to clients w/o risking theft of his
code.
Well, I'll save the intellectual property rant, but it's going to be
very difficult to do. Perl is set up
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:10:25 +1000, Iain Truskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As far as I know, there's no good way to do it. It is Perl after all.
And with mod_perl things just get trickier.
Filter::decrypt does that. It's very hard to
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:17:21 -0500 (CDT), Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
use Filter::decrypt ;
ÿ £j¨tBÃavð@¥£hK6' {'ÂÃ^zÂ'
[]
Of course, perl itself (or mod_perl) sees the cleartext, so a good
hacker will find a way to break it.
perl -MO=Deparse
I've seen a lot of comments which seem to me to say that a static
mod_perl is the only way to go.
But Redhat ships it as a DSO.
Now, on the one hand, I wouldn't just automatically assume that Redhat
knew what they were doing.
On the other hand, I've asked a couple local mod_perl junkies I
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:26:32AM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
So, specifically for the Linux environment, what are the downsides of
running mod_perl as a DSO? (Pointers to the FM so I can R it would be
fine.)
Did you take a look at this:
On 22 Jul 2002, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
So, specifically for the Linux environment, what are the downsides of
running mod_perl as a DSO? (Pointers to the FM so I can R it would be
fine.)
Segmentation faults, pure and simple. The Apache/mod_perl that ships with
Redhat, and I assume other
Hi David,
On 22 Jul 2002, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
But Redhat ships it as a DSO.
Debian also, but I think that is only for simplicity. It would be
'expensive' to produce static versions of apache with mod_perl,
or with mod_php or both.
On the other hand, I've asked a couple local mod_perl
On 22 Jul 2002 10:26:32 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DD I've seen a lot of comments which seem to me to say that a static
DD mod_perl is the only way to go.
I've been using mod_perl as DSO for more than one year (or even maybe
two) without any problems on
Of course this is an old conversation, but we use mod_perl as a DSO here extensively
with no problems. We have servers that have uptimes of almost 1 year (306 days as of
today) and were taken down because the servers were moved to a new server room and not
because of a problem with the DSO.
Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:26:32AM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
So, specifically for the Linux environment, what are the downsides of
running mod_perl as a DSO? (Pointers to the FM so I can R it would be
fine.)
Did you take a look
Richard,
I also use MIME::Lite (on Win2000) with mod_perl. Found it to be quite reliable and
it supports attachments and receipts like so:
if($aReceipt ne '') { # If return receipt requested.
$msg-add(Disposition-Notification-To= $aApobj-getEmail_Address);
}
Chuck
On 7/21/02 8:19 AM, Ask Bjoern Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] claimed:
You didn't tell which version of MSIE they use; but if it's not
recent it could be some CSS that makes the browser act up[1].
V.5, I think. It doesn't happen on OS X, though, only OS 9.
David
--
David Wheeler
--
mod_perl digest
July 15, 2002 - July 21, 2002
--
Recent happenings in the mod_perl world...
Greetings
Hi
All,I am setting up a livejournal server and have installed modperl on a
windows xp machine. Livejournal uses bradfitz bml (better markup language) to
control its look. On my system however, the .bml files do not execute. When I
access them I get source only. I'm told BML is a standard
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, randy reed wrote:
Hi All,
I am setting up a livejournal server and have installed modperl
on a windows xp machine. Livejournal uses bradfitz bml (better
markup language) to control its look. On my system however, the
.bml files do not execute. When I access them I get
Thanks to everyone who responded publicly and privately. I'm close to
getting Apache::ePerl built, but I still have the problem with the C
compiler error. Do I need to downgrade my version of gcc to get
Apache::ePerl (from eperl-2.2.14 or eperl-2.2.13) made and installed?
Output from gcc -v
Jon,
I've been doing some thinking along these lines (for website security,
not for releasing code). I don't have a solution, but below are some
thoughts I've had. I would love to hear from anyone who knows solutions
for any of the points below. Most of the thoughts below are based on
23 matches
Mail list logo
