Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
I wanted to let everyone know that I have ported !-- #perl -- SSI tag
support to Apache 2.0. it should behave under both prefork and threaded
mpms, and work pretty much the same as it did in Apache 1.3, despite the
fact that mod_include is now an output filter.
Cameron B. Prince wrote:
I have a report generator program written in Perl that I need to start from
a CGI. The program takes about 15 minutes to run, so I must fork or double
fork. I have two goals:
1) Have no zombies when the program completes
2) Fork in such a way that restarting Apache
Steve Hay wrote:
[...]
Having a pointer to where the mod_perl.lib library was
installed would be useful. I'm not sure calling it
MODPERL_STATIC_LIB_LOCATION would be the best thing on
Win32, as it's not a static library as such, but something
could be come up with ...
Well, if ModPerl::MM does
Stas Bekman wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
[...]
Having a pointer to where the mod_perl.lib library was
installed would be useful. I'm not sure calling it
MODPERL_STATIC_LIB_LOCATION would be the best thing on
Win32, as it's not a static library as such, but something
could be come up with ...
Well,
Hi,
I'm having a bit of trouble authenticating users. The script I have works, but only a
couple of times before it just sends out 401 without prompting the user for their
details. We have mod_perl 1.99_05 installed, we don't want to upgrade as we would have
more applications to upgrade than
Stephen Hardisty wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a bit of trouble authenticating users. The script I have works, but only a
couple of times before it just sends out 401 without prompting the user for their
details. We have mod_perl 1.99_05 installed, we don't want to upgrade as we would have
more
Hi,
I guess this is off topic for this list, since I would be doing this no
matter if I was running CGI or mod_perl or whatever. I am pretty desparate
to get this working, and if anyone wants to earn some cash helping me fix
things PLEASE call me at 250 655-9513.
I have been trying to
Eric Frazier wrote:
...
But then I found I was using 5.8.. Thanks to a guy on comp.lang.perl.misc I
know that there is a change in how signals are handled, they call it
deferred signal handling because Perl now is suppose to wait until the
Interpeter is in a safe state. As I understand it this
Hi,
I had a problem with 5.8.1 and forking in that I was either getting zombies using the
5.6 examples or the parent was dying, depending on which example was used. The way
round I found was to:
# ignore the child, good rule for life
$SIG{CHLD} = 'IGNORE';
# then sort out the socket
my $server
Hi,
That sound like one way to go, I want to be very careful with something like
this. You speak as if restoring 5.6 behaviour is the best or only way to go.
Do you see any other alternatives?
Thanks,
Eric
At 04:57 PM 9/16/03 +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Eric Frazier wrote:
...
But
Hi,
Doing this works for me. But I am ending up with some errors that I didn't
have before. Of course my bosses would get mad if I posted all of the code
involed, but basicly a database connection that was working fine is now
returning mysql server has gone away, meaning that the connection got
Hi,
is the database connection created in the child or before it?
If it's created inside the child then it'll die ungracefully when the child
dies, so put something nice and fluffy to close it before the exit.
Otherwise, I don't know I'm afraid.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Frazier
Hi,
Well, I am not sure if this is going to be the best solution long term, but
it works!
while ( $connection ){
my $return_value = undef;
if(/quit|exit/i){ last;}
elsif (/closeme/i ) {$connection-close();
:) I think that makes sense. It was created in the child. It seemed to be
fixed when I made the connection global. When I tried the connection in the
child again it might well have been a lucky transpireing of events that let
the child stay alive long enough for the query to get completed. So I
Haven't read much of this thread, but is POE an option ?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Frazier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 September 2003 13:17
To: Stephen Hardisty
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_perl v2 Forking
:) I think that makes sense. It was created in the
I guess you could, but if there's already a load of code mightn't be a bit of a pain
POE-ing it?
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Kirwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 September 2003 16:50
To: 'Eric Frazier'; Stephen Hardisty
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_perl v2 Forking
Hi,
I'd like to implement something that tries to ensure that one user can't
masquerade as multiple users. I'm looking into Captchas, but I'm wondering
what other options there are, and what folks think about that here. My
impression so far is that there's no 100% effective way to do it.
If
ModPerlers,
We have a requirement to change our web servers to require client-side ssl
certificates by Oct 1, 2003. Can someone give me some pointers on how mod_perl might
be used to extract the user's name at login time. I suspect this might require a
handler. This might be used to avoid
Steve Hay wrote:
[...]
What other misleading parts are we talking about?
I'm just getting confused with changes in Apache itself, I think.
Apache 1 used to have lib, libexec and modules: lib stored the
static .lib's, libexec stored the import libraries for various dll's,
and modules stored
whoah! people, please trim the irrelevant stuff in your replies, this thread
keeps on growing for no reason. Perhaps you should read
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html#Extracts_From_Other_Posts
if you are new to this list. We want these threads to be useful for those who
will
Forwarded on behalf of Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:53:15 -0500
From: Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Perl 5 Porters [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHP and mod_perl do not share the environment nicely. PHP's putenv()
will
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:46, Zack Brown wrote:
I'd like to implement something that tries to ensure that one user can't
masquerade as multiple users.
We talked quite a bit about preventing multiple logins recently. I
think it was last week. Check the archives.
I'm looking into Captchas
Are
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:46, Zack Brown wrote:
I'd like to implement something that tries to ensure that one user can't
masquerade as multiple users.
We talked quite a bit about preventing multiple logins recently. I
think it was last week. Check the archives.
Perhaps
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:55:46PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:46, Zack Brown wrote:
I'd like to implement something that tries to ensure that one user can't
masquerade as multiple users.
We talked quite a bit about preventing multiple logins recently. I
think
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 14:42, Zack Brown wrote:
I want to prevent one person from having multiple accounts.
Okay.
That's correct, unless you have control over the client machines. You
can require cookies, which will tell you if multiple users on separate
browsers are sharing a login, but
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:11:04PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 14:42, Zack Brown wrote:
I want to prevent one person from having multiple accounts.
Okay.
That's correct, unless you have control over the client machines. You
can require cookies, which will tell
Stas Bekman wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Zack Brown wrote:
I'd like to implement something that tries to ensure that one user
can't masquerade as multiple users.
We talked quite a bit about preventing multiple logins recently. I
think it was last week. Check the archives.
Hi all,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Frank Maas wrote:
| How to avoid multiple logins?
|
| The short answer is: you can't.
Sure you can. Charge $10 per login.
73,
Ged.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:46:28PM +0100, Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Frank Maas wrote:
| How to avoid multiple logins?
|
| The short answer is: you can't.
Sure you can. Charge $10 per login.
If they can make more than $10 by faking a login, then it's worth it.
29 matches
Mail list logo
