Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-31 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001, Geoff Thorpe wrote: Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2. Hopefully it will not blow away our legs ;) Cool.

Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-30 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote: [...] lots of good info snipped Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff. It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code, and even be made the default shm cache. Has

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-30 Thread John . Airey
SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote: [...] lots of good info snipped Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff. It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL

Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-30 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote: [...] lots of good info snipped Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff. It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer be part

Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-30 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Mads Toftum wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2.

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread Max Clark
-Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread David Rees
? Thanks, max -Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread Max Clark
supported with this option? Thanks, max -Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Max Clark wrote: I know that if you do a bin/httpd -l it will show you the compilied modules. Should the mm show up there? No, the -l shows you Apache-specific modules, not external libraries used to build the apache binary. If you have your source tree still around, you

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread David Rees
Of Max Clark Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:08 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Thanks Dave, I don't really understand why, but compiling and installing perl seperately did the trick. -Max # mod perl perl Makefile.PL

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread Max Clark
: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Yeah, for some reason, the mod_perl config/install wasn't passing the EAPI_MM environment variable to Apache for configuration, so Apache didn't know it was available for configuration

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark Hi all. I have been tuning my web farm (for the past 6 months now), and have had the typical MSIE SSL issues along the way. I stumbled across a post today regarding the

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread Max Clark
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark Hi all. I have been tuning my web farm (for

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
to check. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:58 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Hey thanks David, Quick follow up: (I've

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hey there, Warning: long mail ahead. I've been meaning to explain some details of shmcb for a while and here it is. I can now recede further into my woodwork knowing that I've brain dumped a little :-) If you're at all interested in this stuff please take a squint through this. It may also help

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Thorpe lots of good info snipped Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff. It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL