On Fri, Mar 30, 2001, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out
of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the
configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2. Hopefully it will
not blow away our legs ;)
Cool.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote:
[...]
lots of good info snipped
Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer
be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code, and even be made the default shm
cache.
Has
SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote:
[...]
lots of good info snipped
Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache
should no longer
be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote:
[...]
lots of good info snipped
Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer
be part
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out
of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the
configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2.
-Original Message-
From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Hi Max,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
?
Thanks,
max
-Original Message-
From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Hi Max,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
supported with this option?
Thanks,
max
-Original Message-
From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Hi Max,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Max Clark wrote:
I know that if you do a bin/httpd -l it will show you the compilied modules.
Should the mm show up there?
No, the -l shows you Apache-specific modules, not external libraries used
to build the apache binary.
If you have your source tree still around, you
Of Max Clark
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Thanks Dave,
I don't really understand why, but compiling and installing perl
seperately
did the trick.
-Max
# mod perl
perl Makefile.PL
: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Yeah, for some reason, the mod_perl config/install wasn't passing the
EAPI_MM environment variable to Apache for configuration, so Apache didn't
know it was available for configuration
Hi Max,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark
Hi all.
I have been tuning my web farm (for the past 6 months now), and
have had the
typical MSIE SSL issues along the way. I stumbled across a post today
regarding the
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Hi Max,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark
Hi all.
I have been tuning my web farm (for
to check.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:58 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?
Hey thanks David,
Quick follow up:
(I've
Hey there,
Warning: long mail ahead. I've been meaning to explain some details of shmcb for
a while and here it is. I can now recede further into my woodwork knowing that
I've brain dumped a little :-) If you're at all interested in this stuff please
take a squint through this. It may also help
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Thorpe
lots of good info snipped
Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer
be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL
16 matches
Mail list logo