Hello Aristotle,
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Hi Sébastien,
* Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-06 03:05]:
package BigApp::Report;
use relative to_parent = qw(Utils);
# loads BigApp::Utils
use relative to_self = qw(Create Publish);
# loads
On 6 Oct 2007, at 11:17, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
I like the idea. Catalyst privately invents something like that,
so obviously there are other people who feel the same need.
Yes, POE also provide a similar mechanism, that's why I was
thinking to provide a generic module to do that.
Andy Armstrong wrote:
But I like neither the name nor the interface. How about this:
package BigApp::Report;
use subclass qw(..::Utils Create Publish);
# loads BigApp::Utils, BigApp::Report::Create,
BigApp::Report::Publish
subclass would imply more OO semantic than I'd like, as
On 6 Oct 2007, at 11:46, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
Would it also do
use relative [to = 'My::Big::Namespace'] = qw( This That
Munger::Fast Munger::Precise );
It can easily do that. The problem is more the name. In this case,
use relative to ... works well. But in y original
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Would it also do
use relative [to = 'My::Big::Namespace'] = qw( This That
Munger::Fast Munger::Precise );
It can easily do that. The problem is more the name. In this case,
use relative to ... works well. But in y original example, use
subclass works better. Maybe
On 10/6/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always hesitate to suggest Aristotle is mistaken - it's not a
common occurrence - but I really think 'subclass' is wrong. As you
said this is an extension to the semantics of use that has (I
presume) nothing to do with any inheritance
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni schreef:
package BigApp::Report;
These would also be nice:
package BigApp::__FROMFILE__;
package BigApp::__FROMFILE__($RCSfile);
--
Affijn, Ruud
Gewoon is een tijger.
We're thinking about promoting one of the Perl::Critic::More policies
to the core Perl::Critic distribution. As long as the version number
increases and PAUSE permissions are OK that should be fine, right?
http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?
Hello,
relative.pm is now available on the CPAN. Thanks to Aristotle and
Andy for their suggestions.
For people who care about this, it even works on Perl 5.004
Forwarded message:
From: PAUSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 6 octobre 2007 18:39:45 HAEC
To: Sebastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL
On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:04 PM, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
The interest of such a module would be to ease writing modules
using a big set of sibling modules (in the same hierarchy), and
would also simplify refactoring and renaming.
As of now the user still has to write the whole
* Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-06 20:30]:
As a side note, using find(1) on a mini-CPAN and Google
CodeSearch, I only found 3 modules named tp.pm:
Don’t forget the darkPAN though.
An acceptable compromise it to write it as C -to = Root
That’s what I’d suggest. FWIW,
# from A. Pagaltzis
# on Saturday 06 October 2007 13:44:
Then again, I’d called mine lib::relative. Maybe this one should
be pkg::relative?
That sounds good.
--Eric
--
We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals.
--Quarry worker's creed
Hi Sébastien,
* Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-06 18:55]:
relative.pm is now available on the CPAN.
nit:
--- relative.pm.orig2007-10-06 22:58:22.0 +0200
+++ relative.pm 2007-10-06 22:58:32.0 +0200
@@ -70 +70 @@
-# loads Enterprise::Framework:Base,
Ken Williams wrote:
If there were a return value from import(), they could do something
like this instead:
package BigApp::Report;
use relative;
my $Pub = import relative to_self = qw(Create Publish);
my $p = $Pub-new;
Except that, 1), the API has changed a
David Cantrell wrote:
Also agreeing for the API change. I know I was pondering about using
.. but can't remember why I didn't.
'..' is only meaningful in the Unix/Win32 world. VMS, RISC OS and
others call it something else. On the other hand, I think it's
safe to
assume that anyone using
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-06 20:30]:
As a side note, using find(1) on a mini-CPAN and Google
CodeSearch, I only found 3 modules named tp.pm:
Don’t forget the darkPAN though.
On a side note, if some people here know Perl modules outside CPAN
Dr.Ruud wrote:
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni schreef:
package BigApp::Report;
These would also be nice:
package BigApp::__FROMFILE__;
package BigApp::__FROMFILE__($RCSfile);
Not sure how this is supposed to work, but I think this is beyond the
aim of relative.pm
--
Sébastien
On 10/6/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6 Oct 2007, at 11:46, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
Would it also do
use relative [to = 'My::Big::Namespace'] = qw( This That
Munger::Fast Munger::Precise );
It can easily do that. The problem is more the name. In this case,
On 10/6/07, David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
Also agreeing for the API change. I know I was pondering about using
.. but can't remember why I didn't.
'..' is only meaningful in the Unix/Win32 world. VMS, RISC OS and
others call it something else.
19 matches
Mail list logo
