Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aristotle: is there a reason you're using o-o rather than foo::mkconst?
rous: yes.
I, for one, am curious to know the reason why, so as to learn
more about interface design.
I would have thought a vigorous debate of when it is appropriate
to use
khemir nadim wrote:
I started a vonlontary review on Perl Monks. I don't know if it's the best
place but since they have reviews I thought it would be a good place to
start with (and I couldn't think of a better place). It hasn't given any
result so far :-) . If some of you would be nice
khemir nadim wrote:
I'd love to review the second module that is offered for sacrifice ;-)
Anything to offer?
How about Apache::MVC? It was posted for review on Simon's code review
ladder mailing list in February but didn't get any response AFAICT.
What has been harming this list, IMHO, is
Randy W. Sims wrote:
Hmm, we have:
1) Simon's code review ladder:
http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/code-review-ladder
2) Ask's CPAN Ratings: http://cpanratings.perl.org/
3) Perl Monks' Reviews: http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node=Reviews
Each has a slightly different focus,
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Absolute dead-beats can still be identified by their failure to provide
a rebuttal or continually reaching level pi() with nonsensical or null
arguments.
How about putting rebuttals in your module's POD? ;-)
It's been done before. No, really it has:
--- Wanda Anon wrote:
Mech is great, but last I checked, did not pass all tests on
cygwin because of the proxy strategy in testing.
I'm not familiar with the cygwin test failures, but this test
failure:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/185037
appears to be the same hang I
--- Ofer Nave wrote:
Most importantly... which one do the senior perl guys rely on?
If Randal Schwartz and Dave Rolsky use a module regularly and can't
imagine living without it, then that's probably the module I should
be learning if I want to be a better programming.
I don't know about
--- Ofer Nave wrote:
Other than that, it's a good guide. The thing that bothers me is that
there are too many of them. This is best illustrated by looking at the
collection of links you've assembled at the bottom - which I greatly
appreciate, btw.
In your links, you should mention that
I don't know Module::Install, but a more portable Unix way to write:
export MATH_ROUND_FAIR_DEBUG=1
is:
MATH_ROUND_FAIR_DEBUG=1;export MATH_ROUND_FAIR_DEBUG
The former abbreviated syntax was introduced in the Korn shell, while
the latter works with both the Korn shell and the original Bourne
