I have to agree with the above assessment. Tying 'strict' and
'immutability' doesn't make sense. They are orthogonal concepts. And, I am
not a fan of Moose::Strict either. Yet another packages to remember,
separate documentation. If you fork into use Moose and use Moose::Strict,
someone will
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:20:06 -0600 (CST)
Dave Rolsky auta...@urth.org wrote:
So with that in mind, maybe the flag needs to be more specific, like
-strict-constructor.
We could also offer a catchall -all-strict-i-mean-it flag (with a
better name) that would be explicitly documented as
On 4 March 2010 04:20, Dave Rolsky auta...@urth.org wrote:
I like the interface, and I think it's preferable to a separate
Moose::Strict module.
However, the problem with naming the flag strict is the same problem Perl
has with the strict pragma. Strict is a very general name, which we'd be
