Julien Pierre wrote:
Actually having separate builds for localized versions is a can of worms
in itself. Are the localized builds built from separate branches ?
I was under the impression that they simply had additional language
modules.
The usual practice, I believe, is to swap out the
Frank Hecker has mentioned in his draft of a metapolicy that
a threat model should be used. AFAIK, there is only a fairly
poor attempt at a threat model for browser security, a great
lack in the original design.
Here is my attempt at a threat model:
Gervase,
Gervase Markham wrote:
Frank Hecker wrote:
There's still the trademark issue, but I don't see why this couldn't
be handled consistently with other localization-specific changes. For
example, if the Mozilla Foundation allows the creators of the
France-localized version to include,
Ian Grigg wrote:
This points out the difficulty of correctly analysing
the threat model that is appropriate. Consider
American credit card holders, versus non-Americans
holding credit cards, as discussed recently here.
snip
Which risk is a security modeller to pick? It's very
tricky.
I have no
Julien Pierre wrote:
[...]
My experience is that's more protection than is afforded to credit cards
in France. In particular, the quality of goods provision means that
most US merchants have flexible return policies. I have tried returning
stuff I bought that I was unhappy with in France (with
Hi,
Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
Julien Pierre wrote:
[...]
My experience is that's more protection than is afforded to credit
cards in France. In particular, the quality of goods provision
means that most US merchants have flexible return policies. I have
tried returning stuff I bought that
Ian Grigg wrote:
[...]
Outside USA, most countries have laws on the books
that put the banks in charge of fraudulent credit card
transactions. Not so in America, it seems.
I didn't say exactly that. I reported I heard the level of protection is
lower in America, but I don't have the exact
Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
Ian Grigg wrote:
[...]
Outside USA, most countries have laws on the books
that put the banks in charge of fraudulent credit card
transactions. Not so in America, it seems.
I didn't say exactly that. I reported I heard the level of protection is
lower in America,
Ian Grigg wrote:
Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
I didn't say exactly that. I reported I heard the level of protection
is lower in America, but I don't have the exact description of the
difference, I might even be proven wrong. Or it might be different
depending on the state.
I also was
7. Risks to typical Mozilla users should be assessed in accordance with
a documented threat model based on the activities in which those users
might tpically engage, e.g., online shopping and banking, using other
access-controlled web sites and services, submitting personal
information to
10 matches
Mail list logo
