| Odesílatel: Steve Lhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | Howdy Robert,
| |
| | Alex, if you remember Frank's post about DC offsets, there he
attached
| | a little C program to calculate AC/DC offsets as well as a
correlation
| | between left and right channels. (was around 00/08/05)
| |
| | I'm not
new option:
--nice: Changes priority depending on system load
(uses clock, gettimeofday and sleep: nice is not
portable and useless to it bad design)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Frank Klemm
eMail | [EMAIL PROTECTED] home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone |
Hi Everyone,
The LAME web site is down for over 24 hours now, as is my
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). So I haven't gotten any email
from the list or otherwise.
The web hosting company has 'lost' my account, but hopefully
this will be fixed in another day or so. In the mean time,
if you sent me
Frank Klemm wrote:
560 kbps result in distortions.
551 kbps is the last without heavy artefacts.
--
Could you explain why 560kbs would produce more distorsion than 320kbs ?
Pierre
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Frank Klemm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What about the idea to allow the user to code the file in two passes
for the very best quality by the extense of doubling the CPU time.
This has the obvious disadvantage of not being possible when reading
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
How to compile lame on a system where only a C++ compiler is
available (the
C compiler costs extra money)? Currently lame generates
nearly uncountable
errors with a C++ compiler.
I'm having a similar problem trying to compile LAME for my system,
What about the idea to allow the user to code the file in two passes
for the very best quality by the extense of doubling the CPU time.
Some video encoders (ex: mpeg-2 media cleaner encoder) are using 2 pass
encoding, and it seems to substancially improve the output
MS/LR switching can be
You should apply a 16 Hz lowpass filter for DC removal. Note that lowest
organ note has 16.3Hz.
Iso recommends an high pass filter of about 10 Hz. But there is something I
don't understand about it: the first subband is a lot wider than something
like 10 Hz, so how can such an high pass
From: "David Balazic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C++ is a superset ( more or less ) of C , so it should handle C code.
In terms of features that's broadly true for C89, but differences in the
type system, operator precedence and the the set of reserved/key words are
enough to make porting a chore,
Mark Taylor schrieb am Mit, 06 Sep 2000:
LAME CVS:
I spent quite a lot of time in the last two days trying to validate
the current version of LAME from CVS. I've concluded that this is not
possible. There are many minor output changes that I did manage to
account for (like someone
Hello folks,
for some reason I have to convert something like 200 CDs to mp3 and
they should stay on 4CDs. An average bitrate of around 32kbps should
be o.k..
As lots of these CDs (old recordings) are actually mono, although it is
not specified on the cover, and as on a certain point it might be
| Is there a simple Layer I coder out there to test Layer I decoding?
| I've never have seen a Layer I file.
|
| Isn't there some ISO Layer I test bitstreams? In the negative case, Layer
I
If you want to send some short sample to test decoder, send me mail.
layer 1 is absolutely BEST lossy
Jaroslav Lukesh wrote:
layer 1 is absolutely BEST lossy audio (by me).
If you want to use very high bitrates such as 320, 384 kb, use layer1. If
you want to use 192..320kb bitrates, use layer 2 and at low bitrates up to
160k use layer3. All encoders have different characteristic of
Hi
I just want to ask which layer2 encoder do you prefer or recommend??
(SOLOH or toolame?)
Regards
Stephan
layer 1 is absolutely BEST lossy audio (by me).
If you want to use very high bitrates such as 320, 384 kb, use layer1. If
you want to use 192..320kb bitrates, use layer 2 and at low
From: "Pierre Hugonnet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is still something that I don't understand: layer3 'contains'
layer2, which in turns 'contains' layer1.
No, they aren't related in that way. They were developed more or less in
parallel for different applications(delay, complexity, bitrates,
Mark Taylor schrieb am Mit, 06 Sep 2000:
So as promised, but delayed, LAME CVS mainline is reverted back
to as it was Aug 31. The previous version is in the 'pfk1'
branch. If you want it, you need to do:
cvs update -r pfk1
That branch has a lot of nice code improvements, and I hope
Mark Taylor schrieb am Mit, 06 Sep 2000:
So as promised, but delayed, LAME CVS mainline is reverted back
to as it was Aug 31. The previous version is in the 'pfk1'
branch. If you want it, you need to do:
cvs update -r pfk1
That branch has a lot of nice code improvements, and
You should apply a 16 Hz lowpass filter for DC removal. Note that lowest
organ note has 16.3Hz.
Did you hear tones under 16Hz? Did you have speakerboxes that you will give
these low frequencies? I want to made sub-woofer with 16-30Hz range for my
home stereo, but no lower.
Well. I think you're
::
:: You should apply a 16 Hz lowpass filter for DC removal. Note that lowest
:: organ note has 16.3Hz.
::
using residuals (no 16.3 Hz tone, but 32.6 Hz and 48.9 Hz).
:: Did you hear tones under 16Hz?
::
It is difficult to speak from "hearing" in the range from 10...25 Hz (we
have
:: From: "David Balazic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::
:: C++ is a superset ( more or less ) of C , so it should handle C code.
::
:: In terms of features that's broadly true for C89, but differences in the
:: type system, operator precedence and the the set of reserved/key words are
:: enough
Just read Mr. Maier's email. I would also like to know
when stereo recordings started being used. Is there an
online source that gives a summary of recording technology history?
I would like to encode a set of Billie Holiday CDs that cover 1933 thru 1938. I would
like advice on the "best"
Just read Mr. Maier's email. I would also like to know
when stereo recordings started being used. Is there an
online source that gives a summary of recording technology history?
I know that the first film ever released in Stereo was in 1940.
Space is not super critical. The mp3s will be put
Mark Taylor schrieb am Mit, 06 Sep 2000:
sorry, that is now fixed. you may need to redo cvs update -r pfk1
Mark
Thanks Mark, I could check in now.
Ciao Robert
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
I thought I'd start a thread so we can all find out what sort of use Lame
gets put through. Okay, here's a few options I use-
-b112 --abr 150 --lowpass 10.8 --resample 32 -h -c -d -ms
for CD ripping, recording from TV
(I don't care about really high bandwidth... 24 22k sound strange
with this
24 matches
Mail list logo
