I have briefly tried the "--voice" mode and the "normal" mode when
encoding a purely voice signal (with background noise) at 8kbps, and
have been very impressed with the difference. I would like to compress
the signal more... but 8 is as low as it goes.
The "nomal" mode renders the voice
Nathan Blomquist wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would be or knows anyone who would be interested in a
16-Bit DOS version of LAME? I have been able to produce these by using a DOS
extender called WDOSX. This allows almost any Win32 console application to work in
standard DOS.
I have
I assume that most users of LAME are using the Linux OS, as the GTK extensions are
based around (I believe) X-windows. I don't use Linux, and am stuck with windoze. Are
there any utilities around to run the frame analyser with windoze 95, 98 or NT ?
PS: I know windoze sux, but most of the
I read the "usage" file in the 3.86 zip distribution, but all it says is
--ogg
Encode using the Ogg Vobis codec (using libvorbis) instead of LAME's internal mp3
codec.
What options are available for use with ogg encoding engine? Is there any doco on
this?
Owen.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
I have looked at the Ogg Vorbis encoder (B2) and I have a couple of points to make
:
1] I think it is appalling that there is such little interest in this - it is a
viable alternative to MP3 - and
doesn't have the patent restrictions that our friends at Franhoffer put on it.
Sure, LAME is
You're right Mark, compared to Lame 387 MMX --abr 128 Xing is only two
times faster Bo)
Regards,
Wim Speekenbrink
Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"
LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than Xing.
I thought the difference was greater, but I had
Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"
LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than Xing.
Is that the MMX version of LAME?
Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Mark,
I don't know if it is a MMX version - how can I
