Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1

2000-10-07 Thread Naoki Shibata
Roel The graphs you provided show a lower noise, this because --nspsytune Roel probably. It simply sounds poor, really poor. It sounds nothing like Roel the original on my headphones. Roel Roel I use the one with the "RH extensions" from Dmitry. (thanks for all Roel the compiles and hard

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1

2000-10-05 Thread Mark Powell
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous? You think the extra

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1

2000-10-05 Thread Stephan Ebertshäuser
Robert Hegemann schrieb: Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000: On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1 gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ? From your recent postings I'm detecting

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1

2000-10-04 Thread Robert Hegemann
Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000: On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1 gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ? From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] -q1

2000-10-02 Thread Mark Powell
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote: does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1 gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ? From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely give a sonic improvement. In fact it is