Hi,
I'm also getting the same errors, which varies a bit depending on
optimization level.
With -O3:
Keccak-simple.c: In function ‘crypto_hash_keccakc512_simple’:
Keccak-simple.c:91:1: warning: visibility attribute not supported in
this configuration; ignored [-Wattributes]
}
^
XBD_APP.c: In
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:04:08 +
Nicholas Clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hang on - you say that you are getting this message during
*linking* ? The error message comes from the compiler, not the
linker, so why is it turning up in the linker's output ? Do you have
LTO enabled ? (If you
Hi Eric,
warning: visibility attribute not supported in this configuration;
ignored [-Wattributes]
The problem is, I was only able to reproduce it when linking together
a relatively large code base with lots of functions, and only when many
of these functions were actually being used.
Hang
Hi Eric,
there are still some bugs, for example if linking a lot of code
together the compiler suddenly issues a lot of
warning: visibility attribute not supported in this configuration; ignored
[-Wattributes]
warnings for no apparent reason in random places in the code.
That sounds
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:47:30 +
Nicholas Clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Eric,
there are still some bugs, for example if linking a lot of code
together the compiler suddenly issues a lot of
warning: visibility attribute not supported in this configuration;
ignored
The E2E response hints that we're running into an
organizational conflict of interest at TI.
the main thing I miss from TI's side is communication. All we've heard so
far is, We have this new toolchain thingy here. Like it or lump it. This
is not open source development. It would be good, if
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:43:59 +0100
Kees Schoenmakers ksli...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried the newer msp-GCC (TI/RedHat) distribution on my project(s).
It still builds with _far_ more code then my present msp430-gcc
(4.7.0). This compiler
has also some minor habits but produces compact code.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Kees Schoenmakers ksli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried the newer msp-GCC (TI/RedHat) distribution on my project(s).
It still builds with _far_ more code then my present msp430-gcc
(4.7.0). This compiler
has also some minor habits but produces compact code.
So
Hi
On 12.12.2014, at 12:57, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
.. But since mspgcc doesn't build on Ubuntu 14.04 the code size issue does
become more important. ...
not really related to the code size problem but I'd like to recommend the use
of Docker for the case where the default
Peter Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I want to use gcc instead of IAR. My application is around 3k with
IAR but about 4k with gcc. I tried -Os and -O2 with gcc. Any other
compiler switches that further reduce code size?
Thanks,
Peter
If you use floating point (even one single definition of a
Hi,
mspgcc produces bigger code when you use floating
point operations.
In the manual you can find tips for reducing code size.
Regards,
Rolf
mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 25.08.05 18:00:07:
Hi,
I want to use gcc instead of IAR. My application is around 3k with
IAR
11 matches
Mail list logo
