- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Matthias Andree
Gesendet am: 29 Nov 2010 12:15:21
The list is driven by Mailman, so you can subscribe with all your
accounts that you need to post from and set all but one to nomail
mode, i. e. you can post because you're subscribed, but you don't
On 2010-11-30, JMGross msp...@grossibaer.de wrote:
- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -
Von: Matthias Andree
Gesendet am: 29 Nov 2010 12:15:21
The list is driven by Mailman, so you can subscribe with all your
accounts that you need to post from and set all but one to nomail
mode, i. e. you
Am 30.11.2010 12:32, schrieb JMGross:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Matthias Andree
Gesendet am: 29 Nov 2010 12:15:21
The list is driven by Mailman, so you can subscribe with all your
accounts that you need to post from and set all but one to nomail
mode, i. e. you can post
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: M. Andree
Gesendet am: 30 Nov 2010 18:14:39
Interesting. How does one know this if he's not the list maintainer?
Read the list websites perhaps?
Well, there's no godly rule that a list must have a website nor does everyone
subscribe
to a list through
On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:51 AM, JMGross wrote:
Well, there's no godly rule that a list must have a website nor does everyone
subscribe
to a list through a web interface.
And there's no general rule what the name of a website has to be if it
belongs to a list.
New subscribers to this list
Am 30.11.2010 20:51, schrieb JMGross:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: M. Andree
Gesendet am: 30 Nov 2010 18:14:39
Interesting. How does one know this if he's not the list maintainer?
Read the list websites perhaps?
Well, there's no godly rule that a list must have a website
Am 25.11.2010 14:11, schrieb JMGross:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Peter Bigot
Gesendet am: 16 Nov 2010 18:35:28
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Peter Bigot
Gesendet am: 16 Nov 2010 18:35:28
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
subscription for posting), rather than put into a
Thanks for the responses.
(1) has been implemented. Unsubscribed posters will promptly get a response
saying:
mspgcc-users does not accept postings from non-members. Please
resubmit your post after subscribing at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
If you think that
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:35 -0600, Peter Bigot wrote:
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
subscription for posting), rather than put into a pending bucket where Chris
or I have
Am 16.11.2010 18:35, schrieb Peter Bigot:
Two points:
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
subscription for posting), rather than put into a pending bucket where Chris
or I
Am 17.11.2010 10:09, schrieb Robert Spanton:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:35 -0600, Peter Bigot wrote:
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
subscription for posting), rather than put
Looks like your signatures come as application/pgp-signature. I'll look
into whether that can easily be made an exception.
While I don't want to discourage patches, I also don't want to fill
everybody's mailbox with them. The current build mechanism makes applying
patches very difficult, so few
2010/11/16 Peter Bigot p...@peoplepowerco.com:
Two points:
I'm for it.
--
Rick Jenkins r...@hartmantech.com
Hartman Technica http://www.hartmantech.com
Phone +1 (403) 230-1987
221 35 Avenue. N.E., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 2K5
Two points:
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
subscription for posting), rather than put into a pending bucket where Chris
or I have to look at it. If it's worth our time to
On Nov 16, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Peter Bigot wrote:
Comments on either of these?
Both sound reasonable to me.
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X n...@nf6x.net
Web page: http://www.nf6x.net/
GnuPG public key available from my web page.
I totally agree.
R#
2010/11/16 Peter Bigot p...@peoplepowerco.com:
Two points:
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from people
who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that the list requires
subscription for posting), rather than put into a pending
On 2010-11-16, Peter Bigot p...@peoplepowerco.com wrote:
1) I propose to change the list management so that email to it from
people who are not subscribed is immediately bounced (saying that
the list requires subscription for posting), rather than put into
a pending bucket where
I'll buy into that proposed plan as well.
--
Sincerely,
Richard Newman
EmbedWorx (.com)
Pittsburgh PA USA
On 11/16/2010 3:39 PM, Roberto Padovani wrote:
I totally agree.
R#
2010/11/16 Peter Bigotp...@peoplepowerco.com:
Two points:
1) I propose to change the list management so that
19 matches
Mail list logo
