Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Reports for MS17-010

I ran the report with a blank filter. The report will list multiple updates. Click on the one you want and drill down from there. On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM Kent, Mark wrote: > I think I am in the same boat here… > > > > Mark Kent > > Manager, Client Systems

[mssms] RE: Compliance Reports for MS17-010

I think I am in the same boat here... Mark Kent Manager, Client Systems Engineering Technology Support Services Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE) http://rite.buffalostate.edu From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[mssms] Compliance for Specific Update

Now that most OS security updates are all part of one cumulative update each month, how would I look for compliance on a specific update that is contained in one of those cumulative updates? For example, I'm being asked to find out how many machines need the MS17-010 patch. If I search for that

[mssms] Compliance Reports for MS17-010

So the big ransomware outbreak has MS17-010 on everyone's mind, and I've been asked to get a compliance report on this from SCCM. I haven't had to do this in a while so maybe I'm missing something obvious. I'm using the Compliance 2 - Specific Software Update report to check for compliance on

[mssms] RE: PXE boot slows down after the 3rd computer

Per experience backed up by lots of other folks switching, don't use VMXNet3 NICs and instead use E1000. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chobeaux, Sebastien Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 2:36 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject:

[mssms] RE: PXE boot slows down after the 3rd computer

All of our DP are on VMware ESXi 5.5 or 6.0 , is there anything specifics or known issue regarding PXE in this environment? Thanks everyone for the great info & link, I've missed the Window Size but already did the block size a few years ago. -- Sébastien Chobeaux De :

Re: [mssms] RE: Standalone media reboots to USB media instead of HDD

Depending on the model of hardware... Dell CCTK/Command tools have a way to specify the Boot Order via a command line that can be wrapped into a Task Sequence. Other vendors probably have a similar solution. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Magnus Tveten wrote: >

RE: [mssms] RE: Managing Server 2016

That’s what I haven’t done. I don’t think we have any GPOs in place to do this for any of our Operating Systems. Thank you, I’ll look into that. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Adam Juelich Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:58 AM To:

[mssms] RE: Proxy Management Point and Boundary behavior post 1610

Design is rarely easy because every scenario is unique. Not sure who you paid huge amounts of money to but I’d ask for a refund if they put in something that doesn’t work for you and contradicts what Microsoft supports and how the product works. Do something like what? Having remote DPs

[mssms] RE: Proxy Management Point and Boundary behavior post 1610

Microsoft got back to us and removing the DP IS SUPPORTED. I wish Microsoft would be straight forward with this design stuff now like it used to be. Not getting clear answers around Secondary Sites even though that is in the design we paid huge amount of money for. In my mind (likely because