Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
26-Mar-02 at 11:33, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : jennyw wrote: Also, I notice that when I open up a folder, it gets all the headers before it displays them. Is there a way to get it to a) cache information) or b) read only some of the headers instead of all of them? If you

Re: Using Mutt with a Local Spool *and* Multiple IMAP Servers

2002-03-27 Thread Rocky Giannini
David, First -- Thanks very much for the quick response. When I saw your reply, I thought for sure that would work -- Unfortunately, I made the change, and I'm still seeing the same behavior. Here's what the default account-hook entry looks like now: account-hook . 'unset imap_user ; set

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:02:31:PM -0500 darren chamberlain wrote: I think if you \ the backticks, they will be evaluated when the variable is read, and not when the config is read. So, instead of: set record=`date +'%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M'` use something like: set record=\`date

Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM + Sean Rima wrote: I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP Probably does depend on the patch. Which one do you use? I use the vvv.nntp patch. Just move around as

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time Heh. And you talk about not wanting to spam! :-) You're lucky. I'm too

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:57:23:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the message is. As your X-Uptime header

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Erickson
* A. Reinhold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, One question: When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message line further if the end of the display is reached. Now what i would like to have is that the index

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Dave Smith
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote: Text based rules, Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-)

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-27 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 27-Mar-2002 at 12:50:04 -0800, Mike Erickson wrote: topofscreen=== 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 ===bottomscreen=== as you scroll down (marker = ''), when you hit 6, scrolling down leaves '' in the same place but moves the whole list 1..8 up a spot to reveal 2..9. This way, you

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke: Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also create folder-hooks to set Reply-To: to the list address. Works. Good idea. I probably should do the same.

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Mar 27 at 04:41, Markus Hubig spoke: I'd like to create a generic send-hook which substitutes ~l, something like: send-hook ~l 'my_hdr Reply-To: ~l' The ~l won't be substituted in my_hdr. Is there some means to achieve this? I have this in my muttrc and

Re: Using Mutt with a Local Spool *and* Multiple IMAP Servers

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rocky -- ...and then Rocky Giannini said... % % David, % % First -- Thanks very much for the quick response. When I saw your reply, Happy to help! % I thought for sure that would work -- Unfortunately, I made the change, % and I'm still seeing the same behavior. Ah. % % Here's what the

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: % % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few % % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time % % Heh.

Re: behavior of abort (SigInt)

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Tim -- ...and then Tim said... % % Somewhere between version 1.2.5i and 1.3.27i the behavior of SigInt How? % changed. I am used to hitting ^C to get out of mutt (the main reason % is that I have a script that looks through a number of folders and ^C % has a different exit code than q. q

Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-03-27 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rocco! On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM + Sean Rima wrote: I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP

Re: behavior of abort (SigInt)

2002-03-27 Thread Tim
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:35:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: Tim -- ...and then Tim said... % % Somewhere between version 1.2.5i and 1.3.27i the behavior of SigInt How? Sorry I wasn't clear. With 1.2.5i, hitting ^C quits mutt completely without prompt. With 1.3.27i, it asks if I

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to 'user@machine' it says that only root may run 'uname'. My response:

Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Will -- ...and then Will Yardley said... % % -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- % Hash: SHA1 % % for those not on the mutt dev list, pgp_create_traditional works again % in 1.5.0 (cvs version - a patch from Armin Wolfermann), and the behavior Yay. That's always nice. % has been changed so

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100: Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to 'user@machine' it says that only root may run 'uname'. My response: 'exit'. Did you by any chance have a -S in that uname call? Because that's the only

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alright, I wasn't exactly thinking when I said all gpl, but you know % what I mean. Everything on my system is compiled from source, it's all % one free license or another. We figured out what you meant when you made such a broad and fairly unsupportable

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Alas! Will Yardley spake thus: % Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: % I don't use ps. Or any replacements. % % why ever not? % % Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever % want to use it. ps is process status or something like

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote: % Text based rules, % % Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio % and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-)

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:49:32AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Matthew, et al -- ...and then Matthew D. Fuller said... % % On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of % Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus: % On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % % Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:17:05AM -0500 I heard the voice of David T-G, and lo! it spake thus: % it (requiring root at THAT point) when it has args. Solaris assumes that % you're always trying to set it, even to nothing. Really? I've never heard of that. nfs5{43} uname -a SunOS

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Matthew -- ...and then Matthew D. Fuller said... % % On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:17:05AM -0500 I heard the voice of % David T-G, and lo! it spake thus: % % % it (requiring root at THAT point) when it has args. Solaris assumes that % % you're always trying to set it, even to nothing. % %

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 27, 2002 08:19]: I think he actually means 'hostname', not 'uname'; hostname, on any sane system, displays the hostname when called with no args, and tries to set I agree so far, but ... Here is I think what happened: $ uname -a; hostname -i

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:03:43:AM +0100 Hanspeter Roth wrote: On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke: Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also create folder-hooks to set Reply-To: to

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Matthew D. Fuller said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:49:32AM -0600: I think he actually means 'hostname', not 'uname'; hostname, on any sane system, displays the hostname when called with no args, and tries to set it (requiring root at THAT point) when it has args. Solaris

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 26-Mar-02 at 11:33, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : if you have shell access on your mail machine, and it's on a good connection, i'd just run mutt on the machine itself. ... Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:28:25AM -0500: Yeah; that was a very funny time. Too bad NT5 was renamed to Win2000 and announced just ONE DAY before the fantastic announcement of Solaris 7, the Operating System Rushed Out The Door In Time To Have A Higher

Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500: % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt % knows it's signed). those changes are from Thomas Roessler. I

Re: mutt+Outlook - calendar utility?

2002-03-27 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 26, 2002 17:25]: * David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-26 19:34]: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:30:19AM -0500, Adam Shostack wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:15:47AM -0500, Mike Schiraldi wrote: ..it would be way cool to have an interface that

Re: pgp_create_traditional in 1.5.0

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500: % % % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although % % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt % % knows it's

How to - keystrokes?

2002-03-27 Thread Dave Price
I really did take a look at the online help and docs first ... Are there quick ways to: * change to main inbox? * save a message to a specific folder without confirmation - can i turn the append to folder confirmation off globally? * select and save a group of messages matching a pattern to a

Re: How to - keystrokes?

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Schiraldi
* change to main inbox? ! is a shortcut for that one, so c! is probably what you want. * select and save a group of messages matching a pattern to a particular folder? Check out the help screen you get when pressing '?': T tag-pattern tag messages matching a pattern ;

Re: How to - keystrokes?

2002-03-27 Thread darren chamberlain
* Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 10:31]: I really did take a look at the online help and docs first ... Are there quick ways to: * change to main inbox? If you mean your spool ($MAIL in the shell), there is the ! shortcut. * save a message to a specific folder without

Re: How to - keystrokes?

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Dave -- I couldn't find your PGP key. Is it on a bunch of servers? ...and then Dave Price said... % % I really did take a look at the online help and docs first ... That's a good start. You'll need to go back, though :-) If you just didn't look at this stuff the first time around, then

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 08:09, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : % Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: % I don't use ps. Or any replacements. % % why ever not? % % Because I don't really know what it is, what it does, or why I'd ever % want to use it. ps is process status or something like that,

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 08:33, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH somewhere and you have to /compose/ mail. For moving around the screen, even if you're good with vim (or whatever you set

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Schiraldi
What'd I'd like to see is a behavior where the list starts scrolling as you get within some arbitrary number (2-3 probably) of lines from the bottom. You know what? I've wanted this functionality for a long time and i didn't even consciously realize it. Here's a patch. I'm currently using it

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-27 Thread Robert Conde
You can get half a page, too. Am I wrong? [ Up 1/2 page ] Down 1/2 page -R On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:54:50PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: A. Reinhold wrote: When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 27-Mar-02 at 08:33, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH somewhere and you have to /compose/ mail. For moving around the screen,

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Schiraldi
Here's a patch. I'm currently using it and haven't seen any problems, but i haven't exactly stress-tested it yet, either. The patch makes mutt act spastic if you set index_context to a huge number (greater than, approximately, your window size divided by two). So don't do that.

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C option. It makes a dramatic difference. I am running WinME at home. I know, it's a travesty... here are my excuses: 1) My modem is a winmodem (Kortex PCI 56k)

Re: Scrolling the Index

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Robert -- ...and then Robert Conde said... % % You can get half a page, too. Am I wrong? % % [ Up 1/2 page % % ] Down 1/2 page No, you're not wrong, but that isn't exactly what the user wanted. He wanted to move the cursor down along the messages and have the index display follow

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more specific? ;-) =20 What are you getting at? ;) =20 Sorry, I

Re: Patch: filter-message

2002-03-27 Thread Steve Talley
Yep. I've gotten this same feedback from a few others. Modified patch (w/ mapping to ^\) is attached. Thanks, Steve Jeremy Blosser wrote: On Mar 26, Steve Talley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: filter-message (default: ) FWIW, the edit-threads patch, which quite a lot of people use,

wrong date / time in emails

2002-03-27 Thread cruciatuz
i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing email. i checked the date command and my bios-configuration, and both are ok. where else do i have to check in order to solve this problem? i use: System: Linux 2.4.3-20mdk Mutt: 1.3.27i mutt -v gives me: -DOMAIN -DEBUG

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C option. It makes a dramatic difference. So, I have PuTTY for SSH, will look into the options and check

Re: wrong date / time in emails

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 19:29, cruciatuz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing email. i checked the date command and my bios-configuration, and both are ok. where else do i have to check in order to solve this problem? The email headers

Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-03-27 Thread Martin Karlsson
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 11.28 -0700]: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more specific? ;-) What are you getting at? ;) Sorry, I don't get this one. Either it's too late or I'm too stupid. You

Re: reverse_name question

2002-03-27 Thread Tim Kennedy
Firstly, Thank you to everyone who pointed me at the options I needed to play with to get reverse_name working properly. For the record, the following options are the ones that affect the way that the reverse_name option functions. (minus 'my_hdr From') set realname = Tim Kennedy set from =

Re: wrong date / time in emails

2002-03-27 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.27, in 20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab, * cruciatuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing email. i checked the date command and my bios-configuration, and both are ok. where else do i have to check in order to

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 12:39, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C option. It makes a dramatic difference.

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Simon, et al -- ...and then Simon White said... % % 27-Mar-02 at 12:39, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : % On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: % 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : %You probably didn't have compression set. Try running

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 14:37, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : It also supports compression, but you can't change that once a session is running. Fire up putty, load your target profile, and then go down to SSH on the menu listing on the left side (assuming you are running something current like

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-03-27 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus: Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 13:07, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus: Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could be more specific - meaning that he thinks it is _very_ specific.

Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread Charles Gagnon
Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do this a while back using mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports for example), deleting by date was an easy way to keep only the current and previous month for example. All I would need is a way to say

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread Simon White
27-Mar-02 at 15:07, Charles Gagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do this a while back using mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports for example), deleting by date was an easy way to keep only the current and

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Charles -- ...and then Charles Gagnon said... % % Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to do this a while back using Yes. % mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports % for example), deleting by date was an easy way to keep only the current and

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Simon, et al -- ...and then Simon White said... % % 27-Mar-02 at 13:07, Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : % Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus: % Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf % seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could be %

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Simon, et al -- ...and then Simon White said... % % You could write a macro to automatically delete messages older than a % certain date from a certain person, all in one keypress... Of course, if you did so, it would be wise to use Nicolas's tag-conditional patch to ensure that it works as

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what mike ledoux said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:29:20PM -0500: gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ... gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 57C3430B: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature Sign your key and

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Shawn, et al -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what mike ledoux said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:29:20PM -0500: % % gpg: requesting key 57C3430B from wwwkeys.us.pgp.net ... % gpg: key 57C3430B: invalid subkey binding % gpg: key 57C3430B: no valid user IDs % gpg: this may

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:40:46PM -0500: % Sign your key and re-submit it. Better check what you have, too. If my key wasn't signed, GPG wouldn't accept it. msg26307/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:40:46PM -0500: % % % Sign your key and re-submit it. % % Better check what you have, too. % % If my key wasn't signed, GPG wouldn't accept it. No, no -- I meant that you had

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:55:19PM -0500: No, no -- I meant that you had better check your copy of his key; as shown, it works fine for me. I don't have a copy of his key; GPG attempted to import it from the keyserver, but the one on the keyserver didn't

Re: Tag or delete by date or age

2002-03-27 Thread Steve Talley
You can use folder hooks to delete, say, anything older than a month that isn't marked important: folder-hook IN\.mutt 'push D~r1m!~Fenter' This will be done automatically when you load the specified folder. Steve Charles Gagnon wrote: Is there a way to tag or delete by date. I use to

Re: wrong date / time in emails

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 18:55]: * On 2002.03.27, in 20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab, * cruciatuz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing email. current timestamp (date command): Mit Mär 27 19:28:42 EST 2002

Re: Tag or delete by date or age - pattern ~d

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* Charles Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 20:07]: Is there a way to tag or delete by date. yes - you can tag messages by pattern ~d which acceses their date. I use to do this a while back using mush. Since I have a lot of folders where I get reports (i.e. backup reports for example),

Re: unmessage-hook?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right? unhook message-hook This removes all message-hooks currently defined, but it's

Re: Tag or delete by date or age - pattern ~d

2002-03-27 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 23:51 +0100 27 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Charles Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 20:07]: or even tag/delete everything older than number of days, whatever is easier. this is not included - sorry. Wrong. T~d5d will tag all messages older than 5 days.

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:05]: On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right? unhook message-hook

Re: Scrolling the Index - current-{top,middle,bottom}

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* A. Reinhold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 06:44]: When selecting messages with the cursor (bar) in the index to tag them or do anything else, the index scrolls one message line further if the end of the display is reached. Now what i would like to have is that the index scrolls...uhhhm

Re: Tag or delete by date or age - pattern ~d

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:14]: At 23:51 +0100 27 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Charles Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 20:07]: or even tag/delete everything older than number of days, whatever is easier. this is not included - sorry.

Re: Tag or delete by date or age - pattern ~d

2002-03-27 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 00:18 +0100 28 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:14]: At 23:51 +0100 27 Mar 2002, Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Charles Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 20:07]: or even tag/delete everything older than

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 17:15 27 Mar 2002, Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | 2) My wife likes Windows. Only just got her into computing, it's a bit | early for KDE in English since she is mainly French speaking. I refuse to | have an OS in any other language than English. But if you have the KDE

Re: Using Mutt with a Local Spool *and* Multiple IMAP Servers: (rocky@umuc.edu)

2002-03-27 Thread David DeSimone
Rocky Giannini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: account-hook . 'unset imap_user ; set folder=~/Mail' This is problematic. The problem is that, when you enter a pathname like =folder into a send-hook or a $record variable, you might expect that Mutt simply stores the =folder string in the hook or

Re: Tag or delete by date or age - pattern ~d

2002-03-27 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.27, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: apropos: anyone have a utility to calculate the number of days between two given dates? i mean - easily? no perl script with dozens of modules, please! shell$ ./timediff Wed Mar 27 17:33:00 2002 Wed Mar

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:05]: On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you unhook message-hook This removes all message-hooks currently

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:33:36AM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: Think of it as like a Linux distribution. Linux is the OS, RedHat or Debian is the distribution. Saying Solaris is like saying Debian, only slower and less free. :-) Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:49]: Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list] The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would be very hard to scratch this one if it itches you. so much for theory. well, i find it bad by design that message-hook does not

Re: timediff - precision?

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:46]: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyone have a utility to calculate the number of days between two given dates? i mean - easily? no perl script with dozens of modules, please! shell$ env TIMEFMT=%D ./timediff 1/1/70

Re: timediff - precision?

2002-03-27 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:07:59AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: $ TIMEFMT=%D ./timediff 4/6/67 3/28/02 Difference is 11773.96 days. Besides the fraction, that's just plain wrong. 1967-04-06 to 2002-03-28 is 12,775 days. Maybe your %D is not the same as his %D? Where did 'timediff' come

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:49]: Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list] The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would be very hard to scratch this one if it itches you. so much for theory. ?

Re: timediff - precision?

2002-03-27 Thread Mark J. Reed
Here's a short (44-line) Perl script that will do the job. It's not flexible on the argument format - they have to be -mm-dd - and it is Perl, but at least it doesn't use a zillion modules. The only module it does use is POSIX, and that's only to get the floor() function; if you aren't

Re: timediff - precision?

2002-03-27 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.03.27, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:07:59AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: $ TIMEFMT=%D ./timediff 4/6/67 3/28/02 Difference is 11773.96 days. Besides the fraction, that's just plain wrong. 1967-04-06 to

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-28 01:17]: i find it bad by design that message-hook does not have an matching unmessage-hook command. There's really no difference between 'unmessage-hook', 'unsend-hook', 'unfoo-hook', etc. vs. 'unhook message-hook', etc. It could be argued

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Ricardo SIGNES said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:40:44PM -0500: Except that Linux is only the kernel. Linux + GNU + some other files and configuration is the OS. That, plus some applications is the distribution. You're wrong. msg26331/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
now, here's the situation: when the current message has a pgp sig and pgp_verify_sig is set the mutt will show an error message iwhich is something like this: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Mar 28 03:29:50 2002) --] [-- End of PGP output --] [-- The following data is signed

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:37:11AM +0100: but - is there a way I can just *hide* the pgp sig *completely* from view? Do you still want to verify the sigs, or not? If not, you could strip them with procmail. msg26333/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: [-- Attachment #2 --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --] [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachment).

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread tim lupfer
* thus spaketh Sven Guckes (Mar 28 at 03:37AM): but - is there a way I can just *hide* the pgp sig *completely* from view? mutt reads mail--stripping pgp sigs is the job of procmail or the like -- sorry, couldn't resist :P -- timothy lupfer http://sadlittleboy.com

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Shawn McMahon spake thus: If not, you could strip them with procmail. Oh, so it's ok to strip sigs with procmail, but not headers? :P --=20 Rob 'Feztaa'

Re: Saving encrypted

2002-03-27 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:20:56AM +1100, David Clarke wrote: On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Alan Batie wrote: snip Sooo, before I waste too much more time on this, I thought I'd see if anyone else has solved this problem... The way I got around this problem was to put encrypt-to my-keyid in

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Sven Guckes
* Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-28 03:39]: On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: [-- Attachment #2 --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --] that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachment). is there a way I can

Re: Saving encrypted

2002-03-27 Thread David Clarke
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Magnus Bodin wrote: Wouldn't it be a better solution to keep the whole sent-mail-folder encrypted to myself using the open/close-hook-thingies in the compressed-folders-patch? Then the security issues with having all external encrypted mail being encrypted to self

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Thomas Huemmler
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/28 07:58]: well, I had tried to delete those lines with sed pattern /^\[-- .* --\]$/d but it did not work. however, using the following sed pattern makes them go away: /-- .* --/d I'll have to find out why the first pattern did not work...

  1   2   >