08-Apr-02 at 09:21, VB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Once I mark a message as deleted and exit mutt, where does it move the
message? I.e., is the message recoverable/undeletable after exiting mutt?
Depends on your config a little, but in general if you have deleted a
message, and when you exit
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:12:59PM -0800, VB wrote:
I perused http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#commands and I did
not see that mutt follows the MS Outlook conventions I described. I saw
mh_purge is related to renaming deleted messages, but it's not clear if
this is what I
My first post! Jippie!
So, my question:
There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
application/pgp, and some (e.g. kmail) relies on the body contents to
find out. Which is the 'correct' way?
--
Magnus
begin Magnus Therning quotation:
So, my question:
There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
application/pgp, and some (e.g. kmail) relies on the body contents to
find out. Which is the 'correct' way?
Dear all,
I have found all of the following set commands:
set nomove
set move=no
unset move
Do they all mean the same thing? Are some forms preferred?
Do all set commands support such alternatives?
Tom
P.S. I'd be using mutt already but the native WIN32 mutt from
Van --
...and then VB said...
%
% In MS Outlook, actual deletion from the imap server is a two-step process.
Right; that's IMAP in general.
% Is mutt capable of simulating this behavior; does it retain the marked for
% deletion and purged distinction? So far, mutt takes my messages off of
%
Magnus --
...and then Magnus Therning said...
%
% My first post! Jippie!
Welcome!
%
% So, my question:
% There seems to be quite some different ways to mark that a MIME part
% should be processed by pgp/gpg, multipart/(signed/encrypted),
Well, some of that is based on the PGP method
Thomas --
...and then Thomas Baker said...
%
% Dear all,
%
% I have found all of the following set commands:
%
% set nomove
% set move=no
% unset move
Yep.
%
% Do they all mean the same thing? Are some forms preferred?
Yep. Nope.
% Do all set commands support such
dgc --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% * On 2002.04.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
% * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Alas! David T-G spake thus:
...
% % Use perl or python or egrep of emacs or some of the more modern vi
...
% recall that egrep is *not* the same as
09-Apr-02 at 08:00, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Your best bet is probably a trash folder implementation, where you throw
away messages that you don't really want to throw away (I've never
understood the Deleted Messages folder and why some people keep every
darned thing in there...
Hello everybody,
I start mutt with the -y option to see which mailboxes contain new mails.
If I enter a mailbox which was marked with a N , all mails in this
mailbox are marked with an O instead of an N.
Any hints ??
Greetings Christoph
--
gpg fingerprint: 88DA B106 D973 B2AF 7CCB 725A F76C
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
% P.S. I'd be using mutt already but the native WIN32 mutt from
% http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt just exits on me at the prompt
% without doing anything; Cygwin mutt doesn't have URLVIEW; and my
So you'd rather be stuck in some other mail program
On 04-09-2002 at 08:56 EDT, Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Set your server to automatically purge Deleted Messages. They won't ever
use it to store mail again ;-)
[...]
How are you accomplishing this? Is that a special IMAP server? I use IMAP
from Washington University and I
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 09-Apr-02 at 08:00, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
...
% understood the Deleted Messages folder and why some people keep every
% darned thing in there... It's a real hell for SysAdmins trying to manage
% disk space!) into some other
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
why not? works for me... The only time I wished for a trash box was
when I notied a lot of
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
% for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
%
% why not? works for me... The only
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:27:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
% for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
%
% why not? works for
Hi,
* Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote:
Who needs urlview?
I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea
to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-)
Cheers, Rocco.
msg26921/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:27:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% Or am I missing your point?
%
% yes, you are :) why can't you go back and mark a message 'N' again?
It's my understanding that the IMAP design does not allow the client to
write
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
%
% * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote:
% Who needs urlview?
%
% I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea
% to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-)
Perhaps he should have phrased it as who would
09-Apr-02 at 09:31, David Collantes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote :
On 04-09-2002 at 08:56 EDT, Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Set your server to automatically purge Deleted Messages. They won't ever
use it to store mail again ;-)
[...]
How are you accomplishing this? Is that
09-Apr-02 at 09:10, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Heh :-) While I'd love to, I'm usually just the scummy contractor
brought in to help clean up the mess, and somehow that never involves
properly trashing (replace it with Linux! oh, shut up) or even
properly configuring all of the Win
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
[zero] [9:39am] ~ telnet localhost 143
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
^]
telnet qui
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 09-Apr-02 at 09:10, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% Heh :-) While I'd love to, I'm usually just the scummy contractor
...
% enough work to do on the *NIX side, anyway.
%
% I get my own way as a contractor, as much as possible. But then I
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
so I don't know for sure what IMAP server we're running. It's not worth
further checking unless my understanding is out of date or otherwise
incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
Hi, David.
I just tested, and I can
Dan --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
...
%* OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
...
% incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
%
% I think
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
[snip]
* OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
I think that's the WU IMAP implementation...
It looks identical to
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:59:25AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Possibly so. Meanwhile, if you *can* write a 'N'ew flag back to any
mailbox, I'll start bugging root!
yup, works, no problems :) bug away!
--
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg26931/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Tim --
...and then Tim Kennedy said...
%
% On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
%
% Hi, David.
Hello!
%
% I just tested, and I can indeed write back the new flag to my mailbox.
Hey, cool!
% Both on a Cyrus
Dave --
...and then Dave Smith said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
% [snip]
% * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
% I think
09-Apr-02 at 09:57, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% have the same calibre of client as you do, I imagine, since I'm in
% Morocco. Guru status can be rapidly acheived in a place where real Gurus
% all left and went to the US years ago ;-)
Hmmm... Good point. Any room for more fish
replied to Michael insted of mutt-users, sorry:
- Forwarded message from chris -
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:33:21 +0200
To: Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mails are always tagged as old but unread
* Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:45:02PM +0200 , schrieb Michael Tatge:
Chris --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% replied to Michael insted of mutt-users, sorry:
BTW, you can bounce your saved copy to mutt-users (perhaps after tweaking
your address, if you use a specific one as I do) to avoid the extra layer
of quoting and resultant confusion.
* Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:18AM -0500 , schrieb David T-G:
% * Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:45:02PM +0200 , schrieb Michael Tatge:
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...
%I start mutt with the -y option to see which mailboxes contain new mails.
%If I enter a
Hi all.
How can I set up mutt, to wrap the text of incomming messages to a
specified number of columns?
TIA
--
Eduardo Gargiulo
ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org
Hi there.
I'm using the compressed folders patch/feature, and running this list in
such a folder, with fcc-hook, so if I post a message here, it should (and it
does) stay here, but when I hit 'send' at the compose menu, I got a
mail-sent hint, followed witch a Mailbox was corrupted one, which
Christoph --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% * Am Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:18AM -0500 , schrieb David T-G:
...
%
% So you had, say, messages one through four in your mailbox. When you
% return, they as well as a new message five are all marked old, even
% though you've never
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Hi all.
Hello!
%
% How can I set up mutt, to wrap the text of incomming messages to a
% specified number of columns?
Search the manual for wrap and see for yourself. Pay particular
attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and
* On 2002.04.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not a quick hack that uses mutt's, or whatever regex library mutt is
using? I don't get the perl source bit...
Oops. I did mean mutt's regex.c -- just a typo.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSIT
Rafael --
...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said...
%
% Hi there.
Hello!
%
% I'm using the compressed folders patch/feature, and running this list in
% such a folder, with fcc-hook, so if I post a message here, it should (and it
You should never have mail delivered to a compressed folder.
dgc --
...and then David Champion said...
%
% * On 2002.04.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% Why not a quick hack that uses mutt's, or whatever regex library mutt is
% using? I don't get the perl source bit...
%
% Oops. I did mean mutt's regex.c --
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Search the manual for wrap and see for yourself. Pay particular
attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapmargin.
I did it. I set smart_wrap and markers, but the manual don't say
nothing about wrapmargin. I'm using mutt 1.2.5i. Could wrapmargin
09-Apr-02 at 15:55, Eduardo Gargiulo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Search the manual for wrap and see for yourself. Pay particular
attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapmargin.
I did it. I set smart_wrap and markers, but the manual don't
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Search the manual for wrap and see for yourself. Pay particular
% attention to $markers as well as $smart_wrap and $wrapmargin.
%
% I did it. I set smart_wrap and markers, but the manual don't say
Hello again,
I tried a little and i think this Problem is NOT mutts problem.
I tried some biffs and they all had the same problem.
(except mailcheck). So i think it either procmail or
fetchmail do something strange to the mails.
I will just have to wait a little until there are enough new
Christoph --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello again,
Hi!
%
% I tried a little and i think this Problem is NOT mutts problem.
Of course it isn't ;-)
% I tried some biffs and they all had the same problem.
% (except mailcheck). So i think it either procmail or
% fetchmail do
This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work which I
want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will be gratefully
appreciated.
--
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!
* John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-09 21:41 -0400]:
This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work which
I want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will be
gratefully appreciated.
I've done that
Gerhard Häring wrote:
* John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-09 21:41 -0400]:
This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work
which I want to convert to mbox format. Any pointers on this will
be gratefully
On 04/10/02, 04:02:02AM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote:
I've done that recently. I used Mozilla on Windows to import the PST
files. Then hunted down where Mozilla actually has his files.
c:/Documents and Settings//AppData/Mozilla or similar it was in my
case. Mozilla saves its mails in a
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-09 19:18 -0700]:
Gerhard Häring wrote:
* John P Verel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-09 21:41 -0400]:
This may be an FAQ, but I couldn't come up with it.
I have substantial *.pst files from Microsoft Outlook from work
which I want to convert to
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:50:49AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, I have just looked into and sucessfully installed lbdb, it was just
what I was looking for. However I have to pass a query string to lbdb,
so I am just working out how to display all entries in the system.
I have
52 matches
Mail list logo
