I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Unfortunately, all headers (including to) are signed, effectively
making these headers useless. Is there a way to specify to this filter
only to sign/encrypt the actual message body?
--
Frederik Vanrenterghem
Hi,
it seems like the mailinglist is not accepting mail when I use the
standard from address (since I'm subscribed with an address specifically
for this list). Currently I just change the from-address, but I'm
wondering why the list is set up this way. A lot of people don't
subscribe to every
Frederik --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% Hi,
%
% it seems like the mailinglist is not accepting mail when I use the
Yep.
% standard from address (since I'm subscribed with an address specifically
% for this list). Currently I just change the from-address, but I'm
You can use a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mutt [01/10/01 11:47 +0200]:
I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Instead, use
macro compose S Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0xEDEDEFB9
and when you have hit :wq and come back to mutt (and are supposed to hit y
for the mail to go out),
The only thing this patch does is to fix a compilation problem. If
you successfully built and installed 1.3.22 (as it seems you did),
there's no need to upgrade to 1.3.22.1.
On 2001-10-01 12:33:44 +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:33:44 +0800
From: Rino Mardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
or an overlook ?
--
André Majorel URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
(Not speaking for my employer, etc.)
Hi,
I'm trying to build mutt from sources to include the pgp_outlook_compat
patch. This works fine, the problem is that the compressed folder
support is not included.
I've traced the problem to a call of autoheader in the makefile. After
`./configure --enable-compressed` the file config.h
Hi,
it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
apply the patch
http://mutt.kiev.ua/download/mutt-1.3.22.1/patch-1.3.22.1.vvv.nntp.gz to
Viktor --
...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said...
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I'm trying to build mutt from sources to include the pgp_outlook_compat
% patch. This works fine, the problem is that the compressed folder
% support is not included.
Forgive me for aasking such a basic question, but did you
Hi,
I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
Error sending message, child exited 1 ().
What does this mean?
Thanks,
Philipp
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 18:23:40PM +0200, Rene Clerc wrote:
You could put the following in your .muttrc:
folder-hook folder_name push \l~N\n\
and probably extend it to show old messages to (i have mark_old
unset).
Yes!!!
folder-hook ^nntp push 'limit ~Nreturn'
folder-hook . push 'limit
I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Unfortunately, all headers (including to) are signed, effectively
making these headers useless. Is there a way to specify to this filter
only to sign/encrypt the actual message body?
--
Frederik Vanrenterghem
David T-G mutt [01/10/01 06:17 -0400]:
% Hi,
% standard from address (since I'm subscribed with an address specifically
% for this list). Currently I just change the from-address, but I'm
You can use a send-hook for that to make things easier, BTW :-)
Also, set envelope_from
-suresh
Hi,
it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
apply the patch
http://mutt.kiev.ua/download/mutt-1.3.22.1/patch-1.3.22.1.vvv.nntp.gz to
Frederik,
On Monday, 1 October 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
apply the patch
David T-G wrote:
Viktor --
...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said...
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I'm trying to build mutt from sources to include the pgp_outlook_compat
% patch. This works fine, the problem is that the compressed folder
% support is not included.
Forgive me for aasking such
On Monday, 01.10.2001 at 17:19 +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
...
Yes, the patch is included in the Debian source distribution and is
correctly applied. `mutt -v` gives me (among other things) -COMPRESSED,
which wouldn't be there, if there was no compressed-folder patch.
Shouldn't it be
* Viktor Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-2001 17:22]:
| Yes, the patch is included in the Debian source distribution and is
| correctly applied. `mutt -v` gives me (among other things) -COMPRESSED,
| which wouldn't be there, if there was no compressed-folder patch.
Perhaps a very stupid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Boksberger mutt [01/10/01 00:52 +0200]:
I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
Error sending message, child exited 1 ().
What
Thus spake Andre Majorel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc e),
the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate or an
overlook ?
Yeah, I've noticed that with both mbox and IMAP setups in Mutt.
--
| Justin R. Miller / [EMAIL
On 2001.10.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frederik Vanrenterghem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Unfortunately, all headers (including to) are signed, effectively
making these headers useless. Is there a way to
There was a thread on the gnupg maillist about this last week. Off the top
of my head it involved signing/encrypting with multiple recipients, this
allows 'any' of the recipients to verify/decrypt on their own. I'd think
you could add a command to do what you want.
DAve
On (01/10/01 00:12), Mat?j Cepl wrote:
seem to make a trick. Thanks a lot. I am now really persuaded
that mutt is able to do everything (except for that buttered
bread, I know)! And help on this list is really terrific. Thanks
again.
And for your next trick, you can learn to send messages
Okay,
it appears that the compressed-folder patch supplied with Debian doesn't
do what it's supposed to do. Somehow it messes up source configuration.
Anyway, copying the actuall patch by rr to debian/patches solved my
problems. Now I finally have compressed-folder support and
From the keyboard of Frederik,
Hi,
it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
apply the patch
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:01:34PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Boksberger mutt [01/10/01 00:52 +0200]:
I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
Error
Philipp Boksberger wrote:
I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
Error sending message, child exited 1 ().
what do your mail logs say it means?
w
--
GPG Public Key:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
or an overlook ?
It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
several times.
--
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 at 06:20:33 +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
[snip mutt and leafnode not working]
I think the problem is leafnode related, as mutt works perfectly on my
ISP's news server.
Version info:
Mutt 1.3.22.1i (2001-08-30)
Leafnode+ NNTP Daemon, version 2.14
Any clues?
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote:
On 2001.10.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frederik Vanrenterghem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Unfortunately, all headers (including to) are signed,
thanks for the great one-liner, piet ... that is why i read these lists
aloha,
dave
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote:
On 2001.10.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frederik Vanrenterghem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
You can do it a bit more elegantly[1] with this ex one-liner:
1;/^$/+1,$!gpg --clearsign
Back in the old days days of PGP 2.x, someone pointed out that you can
use a couple of macros to handle common PGP operations within vi.
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:55:48PM +0200 or thereabouts, Thomas Roessler wrote:
The only thing this patch does is to fix a compilation problem. If
you successfully built and installed 1.3.22 (as it seems you did),
there's no need to upgrade to 1.3.22.1.
so it means that my copy of 1.3.22i
33 matches
Mail list logo
