and a positive affirmative action
in itself.
Regards Giles
www.askham.org
www.game-play.org.uk
--- On Sun, 19/4/09, marc garrett marc.garr...@furtherfield.org wrote:
From: marc garrett marc.garr...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
hello there!
i wanted to answer before, but i was flying all over :)(not true)
a series of problems held me back these few days from this wonderful
conversation (and yes, marc, i will call you up immediately :) because
there are incredible news over here, and some of them might also concern
...@richtextformat.co.uk
wrote:
From: richard willis listse...@richtextformat.co.uk
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Thursday, 16 April, 2009, 6:06 PM
Hi Catherine,
Good to hear from you, and much thanks for your involvement in the
discussion.
Firstly, I must apologise for the rather long response. I could only
answer some of your questions mainly because the email would of gone for
ages, so hopefully this is enough...
it seems as though
/displayreview.php?review_id=334
Regards Giles Askham
www.askham.org
www.game-play.org.uk
--- On Thu, 16/4/09, richard willis listse...@richtextformat.co.uk wrote:
From: richard willis listse...@richtextformat.co.uk
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:41:03 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
Being stuck on an island in the middle
On 16 Apr 2009, at 10:10, helen varley jamieson wrote:
yes turning off lights appliances, not overheating buildings, is
just as (maybe more?) important as reducing flights driving. i don't
have the stats but i understand that even turning off things like
computers stereos at the wall can
What is the carbon footprint of using Skype? Massive server-farms
probably
have footprints similar to airports. Has anyone done a comparative
analysis
on this?
Skype actually uses a peer-to-peer protocol, so there shouldn't be any
need for huge server farms (although the network
hey all
i took this pledge, but it's easy for me as i barely get any time to
dedicate to art as it is, the idea that i would have the time and money to
fly somewhere to see it is almost absurd. for some of you guys it looks more
challenging, and it really the challenged that should be taking this
-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:12:23 +0100
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
hey all
i took this pledge
yes turning off lights appliances, not overheating buildings, is
just as (maybe more?) important as reducing flights driving. i don't
have the stats but i understand that even turning off things like
computers stereos at the wall can make a difference.
h : )
Simon Biggs wrote:
Then I am
@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
there is definitely research on this, or at least on similar things. i
remember something about one avatar in second life consuming the same
amount of energy resources as one person living in brasil - did that
come thru
Hello everyone,
I'd like to share some thoughts about the fly for art topic.
First of all, I haven't taken the pledge because I've actually got a flight
booked for next month. But I rarely fly for art, so I don't think it will
make much difference anyway.
I think the problem is much bigger than
my understanding of this pledge was that it was aimed at punters rather than
artists. i wouldn't fly to reykjavik to see the sugarcubes, i'd wait until
they turned up playing a gig in brighton [where i live] or london. the band
should travel, the audience remain at home. same goes for yourself or
Hi Richard,
To save confusion here is a copy of the main text from the pledge:
This is a public art experiment in the de-escalation of carbon-fuelled,
high altitude, high-velocity, global art careering. For six months we
choose to cover less physical distance, move more slowly between
er - what about net art? cyberformance? networked performance? broadcast
music? webcasting? art on telly? (i think that does happen,
occasionally) ... there is a wealth of art that can be experienced
without leaving the comfort of your own home.
i didn't understand the pledge as being about
Hi, I don't have a high-flying art career. I have a pretty big
carbon footprint, though.
But it seems as though this project is negatively motivated,
minimalist through purification, not simplicity: stop, avoid,
less,careering.
I feel that we've just gotten to the point where outside the major
i didn't understand the pledge as being about flying to experience/view
art, but flying for our art careers
that was just me not reading it carefully enough! as you were
2009/4/16 helen varley jamieson he...@creative-catalyst.com
er - what about net art? cyberformance? networked performance?
...
warmest wishes
michael
--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org wrote:
From: Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 6:07 PM
Thanks Karen and Dimos for joining us so quickly and for setting
wishes
michael
--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org wrote:
From: Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date
* to drive anywhere in pursuit of my art...
warmest wishes
michael
--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org wrote:
From: Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked
wrote:
From: Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 6:07 PM
Thanks Karen and Dimos
there is definitely research on this, or at least on similar things. i
remember something about one avatar in second life consuming the same
amount of energy resources as one person living in brasil - did that
come thru this list?
as well as the actual use of the computer, the hardware
--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org wrote:
From: Ruth Catlow ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 6
Hello Marc Ruth,
I have signed up - I know it's mad, but I have a worrying feeling that most
people out there are more likely to choose their careers and carry on with
their flights, over the planet's safety. It is an extremely challenging
request.
We'll see - great idea by the way.
I also
Hi Karen,
I know it's a tall order, this is why we have only begun by asking for 6
people to kick it off.
We only set it up about 15-20 minutes ago, we've got till 26th April,
and 2 (including yourself) have already signed up.
So, I am hopeful...
Thanks for signing up by the way :-)
wishing
Thanks Karen and Dimos for joining us so quickly and for setting longer
pledge deadlines; )
For those who'd like to join us but have tickets already booked for
art-flights before 26th April, check out the comments:-
- Karen's pledge has a 10th May as its deadline
28 matches
Mail list logo
