Yes, you can do that in XeTeX.
(I don't think this is a good idea to do so. math characters are
difficult to input using standard keyboard.)
http://www.unicode.org/notes/tn28/UTN28-PlainTextMath-v2.pdf
or use of the Unicode fonts with math ranges in rendering
the result?
You should be very
+ opentype)
your choices are XeTeX and LuaTeX.
4. Without a more precise question I cannot really recommend which way to
go from here.
Search the wiki as well :-)
Best wishes
Idris
--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid, Editor-in-Chief
International Journal of Shi`i Studies
Department of Philosophy
. This is misinformation that I didn't notice before:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/index.php?title=ConTeXt_Minimalsdiff=prevoldid=9086
According to IP it came from somewhere around London and the content
confirms it:
ctxtools --update
texexec --make --all --pdftex uk en
texexec --make --all --xetex uk en
Am 04.02.2009 um 16:18 schrieb Mari Voipio:
5. Added % engine=luatex at the begin of the file
This solved problem number 2: how to force SciTe to always use MkIV.
To use XeTeX add % engine=xetex at the top of your file, for most
languages it's unimportant which engine you use as long
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached a more efficient variant
Hello Hans,
I don't know anything about right-to-left typesetting, but is the
result of this desired? (not sure if I copy-pasted properly)
\sethebrew test \ConTeXt\ הָלַך test
Mojca
]
while switching between XeTeX and LuaTeX. So this time just for fun:
XeTeX doesn't know textdir command, so I commented out both textdir
and setcharactermirroring. And then you get XtEConT with XeTeX :) :)
:)
xetex uses the etex bidi method (\beginL .. \endL and such)
I used the wrong set
Thanks very much Hans!
I will start reading everything about fonts next week.
J.A.J. Pater wrote:
I've already send a mail in reply to Hans, but it was to big since I
attached the TTF.
I don't know if the moderator will approve of posting fonts.
But it can also be found on the web:
So what I wanted was just:
\environment heb-sty
\starttext
test1 {\switchtotypeface [hebrew] הָלַך} test2
\stoptext
Thanks again!
I'll be using MarkIV for my thesis with XeTeX as a fallback option.
Adriaan
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached a more efficient variant
Hello Hans,
I don't know anything about right-to-left typesetting, but is the
result of this desired? (not sure if I copy-pasted properly)
\sethebrew test \ConTeXt\ הָלַך test
Mojca
PS: I get tXeTnoC. I
It works OK here:
\sethebrew test3 \ConTeXt\ הָלַך test4
gives = test4 הָלַך test3 ConTeXt
This is the way the macro is meant to be!
I guess the tXeTnoC is indeed a result of improper copy-pasting.
Unicode works with invisible formatting characters used to control
bidirectional typesetting.
My guess was incorrect.
I copy-pasted the underneath text into my test file and I got good results.
No tXeTnoC.
So here it just works like a charm.
Grtz, Adriaan.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached a more efficient variant
Hello Hans,
I don't know anything
XeTeX and LuaTeX. So this time just for fun:
XeTeX doesn't know textdir command, so I commented out both textdir
and setcharactermirroring. And then you get XtEConT with XeTeX :) :)
:)
Mojca
PS: keep in mind that the problem lies in user-end not in engine, but
I still find the result funny :)
I used
I'm was planning to write my master thesis in XeLaTeX until I
discovered that ConTeXt can use the XeTeX engine.
I need to use a lot of Hebrew - so Right to Left typing - and some
linguistic glyphs and stuff.
But from the wiki I understand there are still some issues with
ConTeXt's XeTeX
Hi,
Like the bookmarks may result in some strangeness in certain documents
Can someone tell me what kind of strangeness?
Many features like dvi / metapost may produce strange result. you can
search the mailing list and you can find plenty of them.
And XeTeX can't use certain specials
Thanks for the answers!
Especially the tip about searching the mailing list!
And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?
Since XeTeX does not provide most of the LuaTeX features.
Does LuaTeX support right to left utf-8 Hebrew typing with ttf/otf fonts?
Would it be (much
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:12 PM, J.A.J. Pater jajpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Does LuaTeX support right to left utf-8 Hebrew typing with ttf/otf fonts?
Would it be (much) more complicated than in XeTeX?
LuaTeX has more features for RTL than XeTeX because it's one of the
goals of the LuaTeX project
J.A.J. Pater wrote:
And now on this list there is a lot of talk about LuaTeX and Mark IV.
So I wonder: Is it possible to use MarkIV and XeTeX engine at the same
time?
And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?
you could use both at the same time, but xetex uses mkii
J.A.J. Pater wrote:
Thanks for the answers!
Especially the tip about searching the mailing list!
And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?
Since XeTeX does not provide most of the LuaTeX features.
Does LuaTeX support right to left utf-8 Hebrew typing with ttf/otf
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, J.A.J. Pater wrote:
I'm was planning to write my master thesis in XeLaTeX until I
discovered that ConTeXt can use the XeTeX engine.
I need to use a lot of Hebrew - so Right to Left typing - and some
linguistic glyphs and stuff.
But from the wiki I understand
I've already send a mail in reply to Hans, but it was to big since I
attached the TTF.
I don't know if the moderator will approve of posting fonts.
But it can also be found on the web:
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiid=EzraSIL_Home
So the moderator can drop my last
certainly obsolete; I never use it anyway. Feel
free to send me an updated
script for inclusion.
I have never used XeTeX, the XeTeX related scripts may need adjustment.
Please send me any comments, suggestions, or improvements!
Best wishes
Idris
--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid, Editor
with
ConTeXt). The font does work with ConTeXt/XeTeX, but not in mkiv.
Hi,
Did you manage to fix it? LuaTeX goes into (what I think is) an
endless
cycle --- I haven't allowed it to terminate naturaly, as it takes
far too
long even on a quad core.
Yes, I get a segmentation fault here on OS X
with ConTeXt/XeTeX, but not in mkiv.
Hi,
Did you manage to fix it? LuaTeX goes into (what I think is) an
endless
cycle --- I haven't allowed it to terminate naturaly, as it takes
far too
long even on a quad core.
Yes, I get a segmentation fault here on OS X as well. I talked to
Hans in Bohinj (I'm back
mkiv and XeTeX. Is there some type-something.tex foreseen for such
fonts?
Another possibility is to redistribute the fonts as otf. From what I
understand from the license (http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/utopia/)
it is ok to modify the fonts (ie change the format) as long as you do
Utopia? It doesn't come in otf format, but could still be used in both
mkiv and XeTeX. Is there some type-something.tex foreseen for such
fonts?
Another possibility is to redistribute the fonts as otf. From what I
understand from the license (http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/utopia
in both
mkiv and XeTeX. Is there some type-something.tex foreseen for such
fonts?
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http
.
3) Does anyone know what has to be done to get this working in mkiv?
Hans, what's the strategy with non-unicode fonts, in particular
Utopia? It doesn't come in otf format, but could still be used in both
mkiv and XeTeX. Is there some type-something.tex foreseen for such
fonts?
Another
mkiv and XeTeX. Is there some type-something.tex foreseen for such
fonts?
Another possibility is to redistribute the fonts as otf. From what I
understand from the license (http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/utopia/)
it is ok to modify the fonts (ie change the format) as long as you do
and Aditya's answer. In Unicode (xetex,
luatex) you should use
\usetpescript[name]
\setupbodyfont[name,sizeorstyleifneeded]
and in pdfTeX you need
\usetpescript[name][ec]
\setupbodyfont[name,sizeorstyleifneeded]
You can take a look at type-tmf.tex, type-one.tex, type-otf.tex and
math-*.tex
- Euler, Fourier, Concrete Math - never tried it myself
For palatino, times, iwona, kurier (not yet, but should be fixed),
antykwa-torunska, see Yue's and Aditya's answer. In Unicode (xetex,
luatex) you should use
\usetpescript[name]
\setupbodyfont[name,sizeorstyleifneeded]
and in pdfTeX
using TeXlive.
Hello,
apart from what others have written you (to install pxfonts, to use
\usetypescript[palatino][ec] if you are using pdfTeX and not xetex or
luatex), you can also try to update ConTeXt if you know what you are
doing*. Or at least a warning should be in place: the latest ConTeXt
Hello,
apart from what others have written you (to install pxfonts, to use
\usetypescript[palatino][ec] if you are using pdfTeX and not xetex or
luatex), you can also try to update ConTeXt if you know what you are
doing*. Or at least a warning should be in place: the latest ConTeXt
uses
Jesse Alama wrote:
Using MkII (ver: 2009.01.09 16:57 MKII fmt: 2009.1.11 int:
english/english), XeTeX (3.1415926-2.2-0.999.6 (Web2C 7.5.7)), and
metapost (Version 1.005 (Web2C 7.5.7)), and metafun (2008-10-19 15:21),
I run into some trouble with \usestaticMPfigure:
[snip]
systems
Using MkII (ver: 2009.01.09 16:57 MKII fmt: 2009.1.11 int:
english/english), XeTeX (3.1415926-2.2-0.999.6 (Web2C 7.5.7)), and
metapost (Version 1.005 (Web2C 7.5.7)), and metafun (2008-10-19 15:21),
I run into some trouble with \usestaticMPfigure:
[snip]
systems : end file texexec
I forgot to add that I don't get this error when compiling with pdftex.
Jesse Alama al...@stanford.edu writes:
Using MkII (ver: 2009.01.09 16:57 MKII fmt: 2009.1.11 int:
english/english), XeTeX (3.1415926-2.2-0.999.6 (Web2C 7.5.7)), and
metapost (Version 1.005 (Web2C 7.5.7)), and metafun
Otared Kavian wrote:
On 6 janv. 09, at 10:53, Ilda Khaki wrote:
can someone send me a sample file to type farsi?
Hi Ilda,
Here is a sample file for writing Faarsi with XeConTeXt (that is XeTeX +
ConTeXt).
In principle one can also use ConTeXt-mkiv, that is ConTeXt with the
LuaTeX engine
Otared Kavian wrote:
On 6 janv. 09, at 10:53, Ilda Khaki wrote:
can someone send me a sample file to type farsi?
Hi Ilda,
Here is a sample file for writing Faarsi with XeConTeXt (that is XeTeX +
ConTeXt).
In principle one can also use ConTeXt-mkiv, that is ConTeXt with the
LuaTeX engine
output
I uploaded a few fonts, as well as three sample tex files and the
corresponding PDF outputs on
http://www.kavian.fr/tex/mkiv-persian/
The files contain the same persian text with a few words in english in
order to show how mkiv behaves wrongly compared with XeTeX and
XeConTeXt
Otared Kavian wrote:
1) When using Arabic short vowels such as
U+064F (ARABIC DAMMA)
U+0650 (ARABIC KASRA)
U+0651 (ARABIC SHADDA)
the ligatures between characters breaks down. For instance compare the
typesetting of the following words in XeTeX, XeConTeXt and mkiv
(actually
On 6 janv. 09, at 10:53, Ilda Khaki wrote:
can someone send me a sample file to type farsi?
Hi Ilda,
Here is a sample file for writing Faarsi with XeConTeXt (that is XeTeX
+ ConTeXt).
In principle one can also use ConTeXt-mkiv, that is ConTeXt with the
LuaTeX engine, but at this point I
and teTeX, works
out box,
just as simple as:
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
Does any can give me a working example of cyrillic text in conTeXt?
pdfTeX, XeTeX or LuaTeX?
Wolfgang
___
If your
admit that those instructions are confusing.
There are two completely different ways to use Cyrillic.
1.) Using LuaTeX or XeTeX
2.) Using pdfTeX
The funny thing that http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Vietnamese gives absolutely
different set of commands for internationalization. I have tried them
Pdftex
Preferably utf8 encoding
pdfTeX, XeTeX or LuaTeX?
Wolfgang
I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt show Cyrillic letters
with zero
success.
I have tried to follow http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Russian
precisely still
I see only latin transliteration instead of Cyrillic
Am 2008-12-24 um 19:12 schrieb Andrey Riabushenko:
Pdftex
Preferably utf8 encoding
I had no problems typesetting a russian text simply using UTF-8
encoding with XeTeX - and of course an OpenType font containing
cyrillic glyphs (TeX Gyre).
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex
handle that quite well. however, in xetex
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I
Hi, Hans:
When trk is replaced by TRK it works OK in XeTeX.
Thanks! So I think we should support lowercase code for xetex as well
for api consistency?
LuaTeX/MKIV use lowercase labels.
Then we can get similar output using the same tex file.
Yue Wang
Hi, Jonathan:
Thanks for the analysis! Now I replace the trk with TRK, and xetex
output is right.
In the LuaTeX case, I don't think *any* ligatures are enabled by default, so
the language is irrelevant; notice that there's no ff ligature in your
output either, even though this should
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
2.
it would be convenient if LuaTeX supported typescripts like XeTeX does
instead of having to define font synonyms, e.g.,
\definetypeface[mainface][rm][Xserif][Warnock Pro]
\definetypeface[mainface][ss][Xsans][Cronos
Am 23.12.2008 um 18:44 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
Tell us next time what a package is supposed to do.
\setuplayout
[backspace=1in,
width=middle,
topspace=1in,
header=0pt,
footer=0pt,
height=middle]
Am 23.12.2008 um 18:44 schrieb Mohamed Bana:
hi,
1.
what's the equivalent of the \usepackage{fullpage} for ConTeXt?
file name=example.tex
\usemodule[fullpage][style={cm,empty}]
%\showframe
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
/file
file name=p-fullpage.tex
%D \module
%D [
handle well, then the user
can define them in the old way.:
Yue Wang wrote:
last question: is it possible to add fontconfig-like interface? if I
define to use minion famaily, then all the alternatives are
automatically defined like xetex?
i never looked into that interface so i cannot comment
xetex+dvipdfmx outputs are also ugly in poppler based viewer.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
oh, i forgot to paste the link here:
http://yulewang.googlepages.com/lmbug.png
You should try to see if there are noticeable differences
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex
handle that quite well. however, in xetex, fi are treated as
ligatures.
I attach
Yue Wang wrote:
oh, i forgot to paste the link here:
http://yulewang.googlepages.com/lmbug.png
You should try to see if there are noticeable differences when:
* printing
* viewing in acrobat reader
* veiwing ghostscript
* compared to xetex + xdvipdfmx
because it wouldn't surprise me
and now get 5 pages per second on my
laptop in luatex; xetex processes the pages a bit faster but spends way
more time on the mp part
(of course 1450 pages of columnsets and multipage bTABLE's also cost a
bit of time)
This approach did not provide a significant speed improvement in latex
for me
this?
metafun manual: unique mp graphics
i changes the definitions a bit and now get 5 pages per second on my
laptop in luatex; xetex processes the pages a bit faster but spends way
more time on the mp part
My last run gave about 0.25 pages per second on our fastest server, when
taking
to use mpgraphics anyway thanks to your patches, I'll hold off
on debugging the result.
i changes the definitions a bit and now get 5 pages per second on my
laptop in luatex; xetex processes the pages a bit faster but spends way
more time on the mp part
My last run gave about 0.25 pages per
]/msg00221.html
The unicode orientated engines xetex (with latex or context) or luatex
(for which adequate support exists currently only in context) will
probably work out of the box.
--
Ulrike Fischer
___
If your
This is not so much a question of the format (LaTeX or context) but of
the underlying engines and the fonts. E.g. dvidpfmx seems to do it fine,
but pdftex needs special map files:
http://www.mail-archive.com/c...@ffii.org/msg00221.html
The unicode orientated engines xetex (with latex
Hello,
We are using ConTeXt (with XeTeX engine) to typeset some tables that
have borders (rules) between cells.
In the previous edition of the book (which was not done in TeX), some of
the lines between table cells were double, others single. This was done
to show grouping of columns and rows
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
When I compile Korean text using XeTeX + ConTeXt or LuaTeX, there are
many overfull errors because of the linebreaking. But by adding the
command \XeTeXlinebreaklocale[ko] the overfull errors were cleared
in XeTeX+ ConTeXt. Is there a similar command in LuaTeX
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
When I compile Korean text using XeTeX + ConTeXt or LuaTeX, there are
many overfull errors because of the linebreaking. But by adding the
command \XeTeXlinebreaklocale[ko] the overfull errors were
| --engine=string tex engine (luatex, pdftex, xetex)
MtxRun | --extras=string extra modules (can be list or 'all')
MtxRun | --force instead of a dryrun, do the real thing
MtxRun | --update update minimal tree
MtxRun | --makealso make formats
}
{1}
?
Is it OK to use ctxtools for updating? What is the best way to update
ConTeXt in TL2008?
2. about line break for sentences in Korean.
When I compile Korean text using XeTeX + ConTeXt or LuaTeX, there are
many overfull errors because of the linebreaking
is not fixed
yet. it is still higher or lower than the content it points to). These
are not dvipdfmx specific problems. XeTeX-xdvipdfmx has those
problems too.
When I use teTeX 3.0 (context version 2005.1.30 pdfetex 1.21), many
dvi specific features work well. One important reason is that ConTeXt
use
to update
ConTeXt in TL2008?
ctxtools have some issues. See this page (maybe the section about
updating will be moved to some other place):
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Running_Mark_IV
2. about line break for sentences in Korean.
When I compile Korean text using XeTeX + ConTeXt or LuaTeX
the content it points to). These
are not dvipdfmx specific problems. XeTeX-xdvipdfmx has those
problems too.
Does XeTeX also place MP graphics to the wrong place?
(I still use mostly pdfTeX for documents that do not require any
programming or foreign fonts, so I did not notice weird behaviour
yet.)
When
Hi,
Interesting. (No piece of code in the minimals did change in that
respect, at least none that I would know of.) Maybe the old
dvipdfmx.exe did not require the dll file to be present?
well, maybe and maybe I am wrong.
Does XeTeX also place MP graphics to the wrong place?
(I still
accessed using XeTeX. Here is how I use Minion Pro,
and as far as I can see, there is no problem with the setup.
\starttypescript[all][myfont][name]
\definefontsynonym[Minion][MinionPro-Regular]
\definefontsynonym[MinionBold][MinionPro-Bold]
\definefontsynonym[MinionItalic
2008/12/3 Fengnan Gao wrote:
Hi all,
I'm learning how to use ConTeXt recently, and I find difficulty using Minion
Pro, which can be fully accessed using XeTeX.
/.../
And I found there problems with the font.
1). Even though I tried to access the otf features (as you can see in my
code
Hi all,
I'm learning how to use ConTeXt recently, and I find difficulty using Minion
Pro, which can be fully accessed using XeTeX. Here is how I use Minion Pro,
and as far as I can see, there is no problem with the setup.
\starttypescript[all][myfont][name]
\definefontsynonym[Minion
[mainface][rm][serif][minionpro] [default]
[features=default]
\definetypeface[mainface][ss][sans][myriadpro] [default] [features=default]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [palatino] [default]
[encoding=texnansi]
\setupbodyfont[mainface,12.5pt]
\setfontfeature{oldstyle}
...
text
%%% xetex
'
TeXExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | writing option file ThemePoster.top
TeXExec | using randomseed 160
TeXExec | tex engine: xetex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is XeTeXk, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.999.6 (Web2C 7.5.7)
%-line
Not in a mood to be involved in a latex-context flame today, but emacs-vim
flame is another story :-)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift.
true . ** entirely true **.
Glad you like it. (Personally, I use
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not in a mood to be involved in a latex-context flame today, but emacs-vim
flame is another story :-)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
Emacs:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am on the wrong list because I just said ``LaTeX rocks''?
There was a smiley at the end of that comment!
I would like to apologise you and anyone else from the bottom of my heart if
I have offended you and others, but honestly I did not mean
hi:
it seems that mpfigure will be in the wrong position using the xetex engine.
here is the sample file:
% engine=xetex
\starttext
\setupcolors
[state=start]
\startMPpage
path p ; color c[] ;
p := fullsquare scaled 4cm ;
c[0] := transparent(1,.5,red) ;
c[1] := transparent(1,.5
Am 26.11.2008 um 10:04 schrieb Yue Wang:
hi:
it seems that mpfigure will be in the wrong position using the xetex
engine.
here is the sample file:
% engine=xetex
\starttext
\setupcolors
[state=start]
\startMPpage
path p ; color c[] ;
p := fullsquare scaled 4cm ;
c[0
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Get a FREE AOL Email account with
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
yes, true.
Also
LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt
is true
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Anyone who has never made a mistake has never
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
yes, true.
Not entirely (see below).
Also
LaTeX peaple always have used to say
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than
LaTeX.
.
-Original Message-
From: Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users ntg-context@ntg.nl
Sent: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 9:00 pm
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] bug in mkii xetex: mp figure is not in the right
position
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
Staying at an older version of ConTeXt (for example, I always use
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:09:08AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt
has heaps of bugs.
?
for sure the luatex/mkiv (not to be confused with pdftex/mkii) pair has
heaps of bugs (which are
moreover, setupinteraction[state=start, focus=normal] and \goto will
always point to the wrong position in xetex.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 26.11.2008 um 10:04 schrieb Yue Wang:
hi:
it seems that mpfigure will be in the wrong position
Hi:
Please, shut up and code: we need to fix these bugs first!
Yue Wang
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:28:35AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa#322;(a):
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Sorry, but I just can't
of the sentence.
I tried this on both Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux, with both PDFTex and
Xetex engines. On Windows I'm using ConTeXt minimal, and on Linux I'm
using ConTeXt from the TeXLive 2008 CD. The result is the same in all
cases: all the text is italicized.
Does this difference in behavior represent
: *** [ctangle.c] Error 127
cp: cannot stat `build/texk/web2c/mpdir/mpost': No such file or directory
Reverted 'VERSIONS'
-e Sorry, there have been some failures:
- build of xetex on sunos-intel
- build of luatex on sunos-intel
- build of metapost on sunos-intel
-n No svn commit! Please press enter
, there have been some failures:
- build of xetex on sunos-intel
- build of luatex on sunos-intel
- build of metapost on sunos-intel
-n No svn commit! Please press enter to continue!
There are three executables named ctangle in the minimals directory:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/context/build
' when using XeTeX/luaTeX
\setupbodyfont[Adventor,14.4pt,ss]
\startMPenvironment
\usetypescript[Adventor] % leave out 'ec' when using XeTeX/luaTeX
\setupbodyfont[Adventor,14.4pt,ss]
\stopMPenvironment
\startuseMPgraphic{mag2}
% Define macro for horizontal centering.
vardef hcentered primary P =
P
/mpdir/mpost': No such file or directory
If I'm not mistaken then pdftex, xetex and luatex have been compiled
without problems?
The process would probably not run out of the box before a new svn
repository gets created and you would need an account in order to be
able to commit anyway, but you can
with a constantly morphing kernel are enough. There are two issues left:
One is Context and the other is OCaml. The mainstream software is running just
fine.
If I'm not mistaken then pdftex, xetex and luatex have been compiled
without problems?
Not really:
make: ./ctangle: Command not found
make
XeTeX/luaTeX
\setupbodyfont[Adventor,14.4pt,ss]
\startMPenvironment
\usetypescript[Adventor] % leave out 'ec' when using XeTeX/luaTeX
\setupbodyfont[Adventor,14.4pt,ss]
\stopMPenvironment
\startuseMPgraphic{mag2}
% Define macro for horizontal centering.
vardef hcentered primary P =
P shifted
Hello Arthur,
I have tried the xetex ClassicalMongolian.tex and the result is OK.
But the only problem remained - what editor can I use to see what characters I
am writing?
Does emacs for example able to see Mongolian characters?
bozon42
--- On Mon, 11/24/08, Arthur Reutenauer [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Ardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Arthur,
I have tried the xetex ClassicalMongolian.tex and the result is OK.
But the only problem remained - what editor can I use to see what
characters I am writing?
Does emacs for example able to see Mongolian
801 - 900 of 2328 matches
Mail list logo
