Hi,
in TL 2013 neither \setupbodyfont[lucida] nor \setupbodyfont[lucidanova] works.
The first one gives:
!LuaTeX error: Invalid local font in font lbr!
== Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
and the other one complains about
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is
I'm sorry. I was pointing TEXMFLOCAL to the wrong (older) version of
fonts without OT in the filename.
However, the Type1 fonts still don't work.
Mojca
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hi,
in TL 2013 neither \setupbodyfont[lucida] nor \setupbodyfont[lucidanova]
works.
On 4/19/2013 1:31 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hi,
in TL 2013 neither \setupbodyfont[lucida] nor \setupbodyfont[lucidanova] works.
The first one gives:
!LuaTeX error: Invalid local font in font lbr!
== Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
and the other one complains about
!
On 4/19/2013 2:04 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I'm sorry. I was pointing TEXMFLOCAL to the wrong (older) version of
fonts without OT in the filename.
However, the Type1 fonts still don't work.
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never
finished the mappings ... waste
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never
finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf.
This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by
purchase I really mean re-purchase) the OTF versions in order to use my
Lucida fonts.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:12:48AM -0500, Troy Henderson wrote:
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never
finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf.
This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by
purchase I really
Given the amount of re-work that went into Lucida OT, a re-purchase is
justified ;)
That all depends on how it is being used. I'm not sure what advantage the
OT version of the font would have to me over the Type1 version. If a
reasonable justification could convince me, then I might agree.
On 4/19/2013 4:12 PM, Troy Henderson wrote:
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably
never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf.
This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by
purchase I really mean re-purchase) the
On 4/19/2013 4:35 PM, Troy Henderson wrote:
Given the amount of re-work that went into Lucida OT, a re-purchase is
justified ;)
That all depends on how it is being used. I'm not sure what advantage
the OT version of the font would have to me over the Type1 version. If
a reasonable
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote:
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never
finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf.
This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by
purchase I
On 4/19/2013 8:16 PM, George N. White III wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com
mailto:thend...@gmail.com wrote:
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably
never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have
11 matches
Mail list logo
