On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a
On 7/20/2015 6:09 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:50, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\unexpanded\def~}{\futurelet\tmptoken\docolon}
On 7/20/2015 6:22 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
Well, you can make the colon active in math mode and then let it output \colon.
This is a TeX way, I don't know if there's a ConTeXt way for this:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 11:40, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:09 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:50, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
On 24 Jul 2015, at 11:43, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:22 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
Well, you can make the colon active in math mode and then let it output
\colon.
This is a TeX way, I don't know if
On 7/24/2015 6:18 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:28, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
You can add it if you think it is no problem. Proper Unicode characters in the
input help the readability, so putting them at high priority seems good.
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I have experimented with a theorem proof assistant that admitted parallel
ASCII and Unicode symbol names, but it turns out to be complicated. Think of
C/C++ trigraphs, a chore to implement, only to be removed in the latest
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I have experimented with a theorem proof assistant that admitted parallel ASCII
and Unicode symbol names, but it turns out to be complicated. Think of C/C++
trigraphs, a chore to implement,
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:26, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:08 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
I was thinking of just having the two, \colon and \ratio. Looking into some
books before electronic typesetting, the spacing of the latter can vary
widely: some do not use spaces at all.
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:28, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
You can add it if you think it is no problem. Proper Unicode characters in
the input help the readability, so putting them at high priority seems good.
fyi, on the agenda for the gyre
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:48, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
In the examples I mentioned (below), running ‘context’ on the first produces
large colons, whereas ‘luatex’ on the second does not. The latter looks
right to me.
define 'luatex' ... it's all about choices that macro packages make
On 7/24/2015 4:19 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:48, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
In the examples I mentioned (below), running ‘context’ on the first produces
large colons, whereas ‘luatex’ on the second does not. The latter looks right
to me.
define 'luatex' ... it's
On 7/24/2015 4:08 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
I was thinking of just having the two, \colon and \ratio. Looking into some
books before electronic typesetting, the spacing of the latter can vary widely:
some do not use spaces at all. So a set might look
{x:x a}
instead of
{x : x a}
But that
On 24 Jul 2015, at 21:58, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 6:57 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
The Unicode monospace characters were added by mistake, because in
computer science, style does not affect semantics, as it does math.
Looking into old computer science books, they do not
On 24 Jul 2015, at 18:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 6:18 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:28, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
You can add it if you think it is no problem. Proper Unicode characters in
the input
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:29, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:19 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
The function $f: A → B$, $g\colon A → B$.
we could add a mathsymbol entry but I leave that to Aditya to decide
{
adobename=colon,
category=po,
cjkwd=na,
description=COLON,
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:29, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 2:32 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
[Note: I use the cc to know that I have received a reply.]
On 24 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40,
On 7/24/2015 6:57 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 18:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 6:18 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:28, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
You can add it if you think it is no problem.
On 7/24/2015 3:00 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 11:43, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:22 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
Well, you can make the colon active in math mode and then let it output \colon.
This is
On 7/24/2015 2:32 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
[Note: I use the cc to know that I have received a reply.]
On 24 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans
On 7/24/2015 2:40 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 11:40, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:09 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:50, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
[Note: I use the cc to know that I have received a reply.]
On 24 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a similar
option?
lualatex
\documentclass[leqno]{article}
\usepackage[colon=literal]{unicode-math}
\begin{document}
The function $f: A → B$.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes
it behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a
similar option?
No. You have to use \colon.
Aditya
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a similar
option?
No. You have to use
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:50, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\unexpanded\def~}{\futurelet\tmptoken\docolon}
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
Well, you can make the colon active in math mode and then let it output
\colon.
This is a TeX way, I don't know if there's a ConTeXt way for this:
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\let~}\colon
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a
On 20 Jul 2015, at 18:37, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\unexpanded\def~}{\futurelet\tmptoken\docolon}
\unexpanded\def\docolon{\ifx=\tmptoken\mathrel{\mathop{\mathchar`\:}}\else\colon\fi}
\mathcode`\:=8000 %
That lets you do $f: A \to
On 20 Jul 2015, at 18:37, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
It is easy to change the mapping, but if the mapping is reversed, is there is
standard name for : as a relation?
Looking into a book on algebraic geometry, it seems fine to use operator : for
projective coordinates. So skip
On 20 Jul 2015, at 18:37, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
It would be nice with such an option, as it helps the readability of the
input files.
There are two uses of colon in math, as a relation (in sets \{ x : f(x) = 0
\} and in ratios
On 20 Jul 2015, at 21:34, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. It's true that the colon used
in \colon differs from the one used if you input : directly by default
(it's smaller).
Right. For some reason, your code gives the right, smaller, colon
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. It's true that the colon used
in \colon differs from the one used if you input : directly by default
(it's smaller). In any case, I don't see where your discussion is
going, so I will write here a few definitions.
This is the definition of amsmath in
On 20 Jul 2015, at 21:34, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
The definition of a coordinate separator should be with \mathpunct,
although it doesn't look particularly good, so may be better to use no
space at all (as commented in other mails).
In the case of \ratio, since it's a binary
35 matches
Mail list logo
