Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. mailto:l...@pontex.cz
6. August 2015 17:41
Hello Otared,
thanks for the hint. However, I'm still not able to tune the numbering
setup fully.
Now I have (with resulting numbers | desired number):
\setuphead[part,chapter][placehead=yes,page=no]
Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. mailto:l...@pontex.cz
6. August 2015 11:32
Hello Wolfgang,
thank you for the patch (not in today's beta); I also attach the
modified strc-mat.mkiv and a test file.
Two questions:
1.
What exactly are
%\startsubformulas[+] % These two options
Hello,
great, thanks for explanation!
Best regards,
Lukas
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:07:18 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
One difference between \startsubformulas[+] and \startsubformulas[label]
is that the second method creates a label which can be used to refer
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks for having solved the problem with subformulas numbering.
I would just make a comment on your answers to Lukás, regarding the use of
\startsubformulas[mylabel]
Indeed using this structure instead of
\startsubformulas[+]
allows one to refer to all the
Hello Wolfgang,
thank you for the patch (not in today's beta); I also attach the modified
strc-mat.mkiv and a test file.
Two questions:
1.
What exactly are
%\startsubformulas[+] % These two options for \subformulas
%\startsubformulas[mylabel] % enable subnumbers for the formulas
Hi Lukás,
You configure the way the equations are numbered by sayng (for example)
\setupformulas[prefix=yes, prefixsegments=chapter:section,
way=bysection, location=right]
If you say « prefix= no » then you don’t need the other specifications, but I
am giving a more example above in
Hello Otared,
thanks for the hint. However, I'm still not able to tune the numbering setup
fully.
Now I have (with resulting numbers | desired number):
\setuphead[part,chapter][placehead=yes,page=no]
\setupformulas
[prefix=yes,
%prefix=no,
%prefixsegments=chapter:section,
Aditya Mahajan mailto:adit...@umich.edu
4. August 2015 02:08
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
I am not sure when the subformula numbering broke, but I can confirm
that it is not working with the latest beta.
You have to make three changes in strc-mat.mkiv to
Hello,
some more observation:
It seems (sub)numbering (sub)formulas can be achieved enclosing expressions
into \start/\stop-align.
I wrote a code based on a test suite file:
...\test\doc\context\tests\mkiv\math\formulas-001.tex
\starttext
\startsubformulas[eq:sub1]
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
So, finally, what is the PROPER way (if it really exists) in ConTeXt how to
typeset subformulas?
I am not sure when the subformula numbering broke, but I can confirm that
it is not working with the latest beta.
@Hans, what
Hello,
it seems this is a frequent thesis - in the mailing archive, stackoverflow...
Anyway, I'm not able to find a valid way (MWE) how to number subformulas (with option to
create a reference name, like 'eq:1a' and 'eq:1b', and to be able to refer to them, like
\ineq[eq:1a] and
Hello,
the following example (based on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display#Automatic_Sub-Formula_Numbering ):
\starttext
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:1a]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:1b]
\startformula
Dear all,
Dear Wolfgang,
This is already in the core (str-mat.mkiv) but I found a typo in another
macro in font-new.mkiv
Thanks. That's indeed interesting.
I still get an error. I have deleted everything and have updated to the most
recent beta:
2012.10.06 15:31 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.15
If
Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya,
Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix.
However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
in cont-new.mkiv and made the formats anew, the subformulas are not numbered as
expected.
On 15-10-2012 13:45, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya,
Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix.
However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
in cont-new.mkiv and made the formats anew, the
Am 15.10.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com:
Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya,
Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix.
However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition
of
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
in cont-new.mkiv
On 15-10-2012 16:58, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 15.10.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com:
Hi Andreas, Wolfgang and Aditya,
Thanks for your attention and suggesting a fix.
However, after I applied the change mentioned by Andreas for the definition of
Hi Aditya,
It seems that numbering subformulas as described in your « My Way » magazine
entitled « Using \startalign » does not work with mkiv.
The following minimal example taken from page 6 of the above mentioned manual,
does not result in what is described there:
\starttext
\placesubformula
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Aditya,
It seems that numbering subformulas as described in your « My Way »
magazine entitled « Using \startalign » does not work with mkiv. The
following minimal example taken from page 6 of the above mentioned
manual, does not result in what is
Hi there,
I suppose the following fixes your problem though I can not tell for sure,
since you did not provide the error message:
Replace the stuff connected to
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
in
cont-new.mkiv
with
\def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
Am 14.10.2012 um 22:25 schrieb Andreas Mang m...@imt.uni-luebeck.de:
Hi there,
I suppose the following fixes your problem though I can not tell for sure,
since you did not provide the error message:
Replace the stuff connected to
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
in
21 matches
Mail list logo
