[NTG-context] Re: New upload doesn't work on macOS 10.13.6

2024-02-18 Thread Gavin via ntg-context
Hi Ralf I keep TeX Live on my Mac. It’s a great fall-back when I have new version surprises with ConTeXt. tug.org/mactex/ TeX Live has a friendly installer. Updates are easy with TeX Live Utility. TeX Live has a version of ConTeXt from last May, and it’s quite a good version, in my

[NTG-context] Re: New upload doesn't work on macOS 10.13.6

2024-02-18 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Dear Ralf, On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 21:07, Ralf Heinrich Arning wrote: > > after having tried to update with the new upload, ConTEXt doesn't run anymore. > > According to the output the new version requires a more recent system. We had some technical difficulties on our build farm, so Hans built

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-09-04 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 9/4/23 19:22, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > new upload with packed itemize fix .. hopefyully no side effects of some > work in progress (but no crashes in test suite so likely ok) Hi Hans, many thanks for the ultrafast fix and upload. Pablo

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-08-17 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 8/16/23 19:46, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > I Uploaded an update so you can spend the evening wikifying units ... Hi Hans, many thanks for the update. As for yesterday, I’m afraid I was required elsewhere... > see lowlevel manual for the full list Many thanks for adding

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-08-16 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
Hi Pablo, I Uploaded an update so you can spend the evening wikifying units ... see lowlevel manual for the full list \startTEXpage[offset=1ex] x\vrule height 1fa depth 1fd\relax x % \ascender \descender x\vrule height 1sh depth 1sd\relax x % \strutht \strutdp x\vrule height 1fc

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-08-16 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 8/15/2023 10:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 8/15/23 22:16, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: On 8/15/2023 9:27 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: [...] I wonder whether we could have (current) frame width and height as unit. we can have fw fh fo lw (width height offset linewidth) but keep

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-08-15 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 8/15/23 22:16, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > On 8/15/2023 9:27 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> I wonder whether we could have (current) frame width and height as unit. > we can have > >fw fh fo lw (width height offset linewidth) > > but keep in mind that only properties that

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-08-15 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 8/15/2023 9:27 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 8/15/23 19:08, Hans Hagen wrote: [...] The units starting with 'u' are considered user units but be carefulk with other combinations as we have (and will have more) built into context ones, like pi : pi for Mikael ft : foot for Alan fs : (global

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-08-15 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 8/15/23 19:08, Hans Hagen wrote: > [...] > The units starting with 'u' are considered user units but be carefulk > with other combinations as we have (and will have more) built into > context ones, like > > pi : pi for Mikael > ft : foot for Alan > fs : (global body) font size > tw : (layout)

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-07-19 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 7/18/2023 11:53 PM, Rik Kabel wrote: Nice. Some of my make files use concurrence (MAKEFLAGS += --jobs=5). That seems to bring similar benefits. Is this different beyond the syntax? they are different processes indeed, but the implementation is somewhat curious as it needs to be portable

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-07-18 Thread Rik Kabel
On 7/18/2023 4:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, In todays upload there is a follow up on a new feature that is already present in the previous upload (but that was not yet advertised):   context --parallel test1.tex test2.tex test3.tex   context --parallel --pattern=test*.tex   context

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-07-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/10/2023 5:51 PM, Rik Kabel wrote: The following code now fails. It works as expected under 2023.05.05 as found in the texlive.net runner.    \defineparagraphs[TwoCols][n=2]    \setupparagraphs[TwoCols][2][\width=.5\textwidth]    \starttext    \input knuth \par    \startTwoCols   

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-07-10 Thread Rik Kabel
The following code now fails. It works as expected under 2023.05.05 as found in the texlive.net runner. \defineparagraphs[TwoCols][n=2] \setupparagraphs[TwoCols][2][\width=.5\textwidth] \starttext \input knuth \par \startTwoCols \input knuth \par \nextTwoCols \input

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-07-10 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/10/2023 10:43 AM, denis.ma...@unibe.ch wrote: Page puilder mode sounds interesting! What are you plans for that? Things like: - overflow area - vertical expansion - more detailed tracing - more accurate \testpage - initial and as-we-go stretch/shrink manipulation Most is already there

[NTG-context] Re: new upload

2023-07-10 Thread denis.maier
Hi Hans, Page puilder mode sounds interesting! What are you plans for that? Best, Denis > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Hans Hagen via ntg-context > Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. Juli 2023 19:51 > An: mailing list for ConTeXt users > Cc: Hans Hagen > Betreff: [NTG-context] new upload > >