Hans,
just accidentally, I discovered that \XeTeX\ misbehaves:
\starttext
\input{zapf} \XETEX\ \input{knuth}
\stoptext
BTW, this is the MWE after I saw
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/luametatex.pdf#page=15.
I hope it helps,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/23/2012 7:29 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets
On 12/23/2012 7:29 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets stripped. Anyway, after some
searching it turned out this was added in
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets stripped. Anyway, after some
searching it turned out this was added in 2004 for ConTeXt to workaround
some MetaPost
In response to Hans Hagen and Wolfgang Schuster's messages of Dec. 5,
Just to let you know, in response to your messages, I am working a
small, self-contained example that reproduces the problem.
However I have been asked to focus on a different project for a few
days, so ... please don't
Hi all,
I'm working with some code that was developed by someone else.
The document I'm typesetting is now giving the following error:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
\otr:1:27
\OTRSETdoifcellelse ...er #1:\number #2\endcsname
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with some code that was developed by someone else.
The document I'm typesetting is now giving the following error:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
\otr:1:27
\OTRSETdoifcellelse ...er
/Hans Hagen wrote (///Wed Dec 5 14:10:12 CET 2012/):/
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
/ Hi all,
/
/...
/
/
//
// % Abbreviations
// \definestartstop
//[abblist]
//
Am 05.12.2012 um 16:46 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org:
/Hans Hagen wrote (///Wed Dec 5 14:10:12 CET 2012/):/
On 12/5/2012 11:19 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
/ Hi all,
/
/...
/
/
//
// % Abbreviations
Jesse Alama wrote:
Any progress on this? As of 2009-04-09, attachments with xetex still
behave as Andrea described on 2008-03-31. (I'm using the xetex in the
minimals.)
i didn't look into it; it's mostly a dpx backend issue btw, not that
much related to xetex
Hans
Any progress on this? As of 2009-04-09, attachments with xetex still
behave as Andrea described on 2008-03-31. (I'm using the xetex in the
minimals.)
Jesse
Andrea Valle va...@di.unito.it writes:
Thanks Mojca, Hans,
ok, I've understood.
:)
-a-
On 3 Apr 2008, at 12:17, Hans Hagen
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 15:33, John Hughes wrote:
What is the correct way of selecting a font and using OpenType
features? I have tried
\definetypeface[linlib][rm][Xserif][Linux Libertine][features=oldstyle]
\setupbodyfont[linlib, 12pt]
but the output prints Computer Modern (and not with
What is the correct way of selecting a font and using OpenType
features? I have tried
\definetypeface[linlib][rm][Xserif][Linux Libertine][features=oldstyle]
\setupbodyfont[linlib, 12pt]
but the output prints Computer Modern (and not with old-style
numerals). The font seems to work without the
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached a more efficient variant
Hello Hans,
I don't know anything about right-to-left typesetting, but is the
result of this desired? (not sure if I copy-pasted properly)
\sethebrew test \ConTeXt\ הָלַך test
Mojca
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:54 PM, J.A.J. Pater wrote:
My guess was incorrect.
I copy-pasted the underneath text into my test file and I got good results.
No tXeTnoC.
So here it just works like a charm.
I'm sorry. I accidentally commented out \setcharactermirroring[1]
Thanks very much Hans!
I will start reading everything about fonts next week.
J.A.J. Pater wrote:
I've already send a mail in reply to Hans, but it was to big since I
attached the TTF.
I don't know if the moderator will approve of posting fonts.
But it can also be found on the web:
So what I wanted was just:
\environment heb-sty
\starttext
test1 {\switchtotypeface [hebrew] הָלַך} test2
\stoptext
Thanks again!
I'll be using MarkIV for my thesis with XeTeX as a fallback option.
Adriaan.
___
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached a more efficient variant
Hello Hans,
I don't know anything about right-to-left typesetting, but is the
result of this desired? (not sure if I copy-pasted properly)
\sethebrew test \ConTeXt\ הָלַך test
Mojca
PS: I get tXeTnoC. I
It works OK here:
\sethebrew test3 \ConTeXt\ הָלַך test4
gives = test4 הָלַך test3 ConTeXt
This is the way the macro is meant to be!
I guess the tXeTnoC is indeed a result of improper copy-pasting.
Unicode works with invisible formatting characters used to control
bidirectional typesetting.
My guess was incorrect.
I copy-pasted the underneath text into my test file and I got good results.
No tXeTnoC.
So here it just works like a charm.
Grtz, Adriaan.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached a more efficient variant
Hello Hans,
I don't know anything
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:54 PM, J.A.J. Pater wrote:
My guess was incorrect.
I copy-pasted the underneath text into my test file and I got good results.
No tXeTnoC.
So here it just works like a charm.
I'm sorry. I accidentally commented out \setcharactermirroring[1]
while switching between
I'm was planning to write my master thesis in XeLaTeX until I
discovered that ConTeXt can use the XeTeX engine.
I need to use a lot of Hebrew - so Right to Left typing - and some
linguistic glyphs and stuff.
But from the wiki I understand there are still some issues with
ConTeXt's
Hi,
Like the bookmarks may result in some strangeness in certain documents
Can someone tell me what kind of strangeness?
Many features like dvi / metapost may produce strange result. you can
search the mailing list and you can find plenty of them.
And XeTeX can't use certain specials and
Thanks for the answers!
Especially the tip about searching the mailing list!
And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?
Since XeTeX does not provide most of the LuaTeX features.
Does LuaTeX support right to left utf-8 Hebrew typing with ttf/otf fonts?
Would it be (much)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:12 PM, J.A.J. Pater jajpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Does LuaTeX support right to left utf-8 Hebrew typing with ttf/otf fonts?
Would it be (much) more complicated than in XeTeX?
LuaTeX has more features for RTL than XeTeX because it's one of the
goals of the LuaTeX project.
J.A.J. Pater wrote:
And now on this list there is a lot of talk about LuaTeX and Mark IV.
So I wonder: Is it possible to use MarkIV and XeTeX engine at the same
time?
And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?
you could use both at the same time, but xetex uses mkii and
J.A.J. Pater wrote:
Thanks for the answers!
Especially the tip about searching the mailing list!
And if not, why should (or shouldn't) I use MarkIV over XeTeX?
Since XeTeX does not provide most of the LuaTeX features.
Does LuaTeX support right to left utf-8 Hebrew typing with ttf/otf
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM, J.A.J. Pater wrote:
I'm was planning to write my master thesis in XeLaTeX until I
discovered that ConTeXt can use the XeTeX engine.
I need to use a lot of Hebrew - so Right to Left typing - and some
linguistic glyphs and stuff.
But from the wiki I understand
I've already send a mail in reply to Hans, but it was to big since I
attached the TTF.
I don't know if the moderator will approve of posting fonts.
But it can also be found on the web:
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiid=EzraSIL_Home
So the moderator can drop my last
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Bart C. Wise wrote:
Mojca,
Thanks for all you time in helping out. I'm still having problems. The
\quote and \quotation work. However, as you pointed out, the en, em and
apostrophe do not work.
In addition, [features=default] did not compile, but
I think the error I got was not having enough sleep :-) because I worked on it
this morning and it's working. I'll tack on my current file below. The font
features does not seem to make any difference. However, I took the same
typescript and modified it for the Tallys font and I can turn
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Bart C. Wise wrote:
I think the error I got was not having enough sleep :-) because I worked on it
this morning and it's working. I'll tack on my current file below. The font
features does not seem to make any difference. However, I took the same
typescript
Fontforge shows no ligatures for Adobe Garamond; however, it does show
ligatures for the Tallys fonts. So that probably explains why there are no
ligatures.
However, the font has a lot of kerning pairs, but I don't seem to be able turn
those on/off with the \definefontfeature directive as I
Am 21.11.2008 um 18:25 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
Fontforge shows no ligatures for Adobe Garamond; however, it does show
ligatures for the Tallys fonts. So that probably explains why there
are no
ligatures.
However, the font has a lot of kerning pairs, but I don't seem to be
able turn
On Friday 21 November 2008 11:11:39 am Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.11.2008 um 18:25 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
Fontforge shows no ligatures for Adobe Garamond; however, it does show
ligatures for the Tallys fonts. So that probably explains why there
are no
ligatures.
However, the font
Bart C. Wise wrote:
I'm running TeXLive 2008.
When I compile for XeTeX (texexec --xtx) I get the following output that
appears to be generating the lmtypewriter10-regular font. The bad part is
that this is very slow. The part that's even worse, it does this probably
20...30...40 times?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Bart C. Wise wrote:
The code below is used to load the Adobe Garmond fonts. The problem is that
quotes (``) produces two single quotes. Similar with dashes: an en dash
produces to dashes, an em dash likewise produces three dashes. What am I
doing wrong
Mojca,
Thanks for all you time in helping out. I'm still having problems. The
\quote and \quotation work. However, as you pointed out, the en, em and
apostrophe do not work.
In addition, [features=default] did not compile, but [feature=default] did.
Here's what I'm working with:
I'm running TeXLive 2008.
When I compile for XeTeX (texexec --xtx) I get the following output that
appears to be generating the lmtypewriter10-regular font. The bad part is
that this is very slow. The part that's even worse, it does this probably
20...30...40 times? A compilation takes 145
I am currently trying to get the mara font loaded into XeTeX. Here's some
information about the font (via fontforge):
file: marafont.ttf
Fontname: MaraFontNFPlain:
Family Name: MaraFontNF Plain:
(yes, the colons are in the name)
I've tried a couple of ways, using both the fontname and the
I've tried a couple of ways, using both the fontname and the family name,
both
with and without the ending semi-colons; however, it fails at compile time.
Have you tried prepending name: to the font name, like I explained
yesterday?
Arthur
I tried prepending name and it didn't work. I also tried file:marafont,
but that didn't work either. Your code yesterday was great and I have not
tried to plug in the mara font into a typescript. There are some fonts that I
just want to put in one section of the text without having to write
I also tried plugging it into the typescript (not what I want), but that
didn't work either. I tried both the name: and the file: options.
Still lost,
Bart
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 11:54:49 am Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I've tried a couple of ways, using both the fontname and the family
One thing of possible interest is that when I load the font in fontforge, I
get the following warning:
Bad Font Name
The Postscript font name MaraFontNF Plain: is invalid. It should be
printable ASCII, must not contain (){}[]%/ or space and must be shorter than
63 characters.
Is the colon at
Is the colon at the end of the name a problem?
No, the message says the problem is with the space character, but it
is of little concern here (XeTeX doesn't use PostScript font names at
all).
Is it the font from http://www.perry.com/disney/indy/marafont.html?
It seems to have quite a number
That seems to work. I just renamed the fontname and family (removing the
colon), generated a new ttf and loaded that into the system.
So this works:
\definetypeface[MaraFontNFPlain][rm][Xserif][MaraFontNFPlain]
\starttext
\startfont[MaraFontNFPlain]
This is a test.
\stoptext
And yes, the url
One quick question (again expressing my ignorance). Why can't I take the
code
above and change it to the following:
\definetypeface[Mara][rm][Xserif][MaraFontNFPlain]
\starttext
\startfont[Mara]
This is a test.
\stoptext
I have no idea ... Does it really not work?
Arthur
Am 18.11.2008 um 23:00 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
One quick question (again expressing my ignorance). Why can't I
take the code
above and change it to the following:
\definetypeface[Mara][rm][Xserif][MaraFontNFPlain]
\starttext
\startfont[Mara]
This is a test.
\stoptext
I have no
Wolfgang,
This one does work.
Thanks again,
Bart
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 03:28:45 pm Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 18.11.2008 um 23:00 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
One quick question (again expressing my ignorance). Why can't I
take the code
above and change it to the following:
I ought to mention small caps doesn't work with the last approach.
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Mohamed Bana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So ... can someone provide a sample file of a document that uses old
style by default?
Clearly the following doesn't work;
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Jeff Smith wrote:
\definefontfeature[bodyfeatures][method=node,script=latn,language=dflt,liga=yes,onum=yes,kern=yes,trep=yes,dlig=yes]
I get the onum and dlig working with this, but, like I said, the trep
doesn't work. If I am not mistaken, it's this feature
Thank you Mojca for this quick reply! I didn't expect one right away,
so I'm glad I'm not the only one not wanting to leave ConTeXt aside
even during the weekend. ;-) So tlig it is.
Thanks again!
Jeff
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:56, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at
So ... can someone provide a sample file of a document that uses old
style by default?
Clearly the following doesn't work;
\definetypeface[myface][rm][Xserif][Minion Pro]
% i've also tried
%\definetypeface[myface][rm][Xserif][Warnock Pro]
\definetypeface[myface][ss][Xsans][Myriad Pro]
Yue Wang wrote:
The problem is that that's only a dirty trick that is not supposed to
work and might stop working in the future, so I would rather try not
to rely on it. A better interface for XeTeX typescripts (something
similar to fontspec) is missing heavily.
I prefer use opentype
Mohamed Bana wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Mohamed Bana wrote:
Hi guys,
Why doesn't this definition use the old style numerals that come with the
font?
It seems to use the latin modern font when I try to use \os. Small caps
are
working fine.
\os is
The problem is that that's only a dirty trick that is not supposed to
work and might stop working in the future, so I would rather try not
to rely on it. A better interface for XeTeX typescripts (something
similar to fontspec) is missing heavily.
I prefer use opentype features than add
Hi guys,
Why doesn't this definition use the old style numerals that come with the font?
It seems to use the latin modern font when I try to use \os. Small caps are
working fine.
I'd like all the numbers in the document to be typeset in old style numerals
unless I tell it otherwise, btw how
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Mohamed Bana wrote:
Hi guys,
Why doesn't this definition use the old style numerals that come with the
font?
It seems to use the latin modern font when I try to use \os. Small caps are
working fine.
I'd like all the numbers in the document to be typeset
you mis-googled :-)
http://www.google.com/cse?q=gentiumcx=016640200293943433883:w-6slqs1kjgcof=FORID:0sa=Special+Search
I really couldn't think that problem was font-dependent :)
following code should be work.
\starttypescript[serif][gentium-basic]
\definefontsynonym[Serif]
Neiaglov Dmitry wrote:
you mis-googled :-)
http://www.google.com/cse?q=gentiumcx=016640200293943433883:w-6slqs1kjgcof=FORID:0sa=Special+Search
I really couldn't think that problem was font-dependent :)
following code should be work.
\starttypescript[serif][gentium-basic]
2008/7/10 Neiaglov Dmitry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
you mis-googled :-)
http://www.google.com/cse?q=gentiumcx=016640200293943433883:w-6slqs1kjgcof=FORID:0sa=Special+Search
I really couldn't think that problem was font-dependent :)
Indeed... I pointed you to the very helpful 'special search' box in
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Neiaglov Dmitry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you mis-googled :-)
http://www.google.com/cse?q=gentiumcx=016640200293943433883:w-6slqs1kjgcof=FORID:0sa=Special+Search
I really couldn't think that problem was font-dependent :)
following code should be work.
\starttypescript[serif][gentium-basic]
\definefontsynonym[Serif] [GentiumBasic]
\definefontsynonym[SerifItalic][GentiumBasicItalic]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBold] [GentiumBasicBold]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBoldItalic][GentiumBasicBoldItalic]
\stoptypescript
Cool, that
Neiaglov Dmitry wrote:
\starttypescript[serif][gentium-basic]
\definefontsynonym[Serif] [GentiumBasic]
\definefontsynonym[SerifItalic][GentiumBasicItalic]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBold] [GentiumBasicBold]
\definefontsynonym[SerifBoldItalic][GentiumBasicBoldItalic]
Hello there!
I was googling around, but couldn't really figure out how to use
OpenType fonts with ConTeXt and XeTeX with precise sizes in points. I
am trying to create a subsection style with Gentium 24pt.
I am creating a typeface like it's recommended in the documentation:
\definetypeface
2008/7/10 Neiaglov Dmitry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello there!
I was googling around,
you mis-googled :-)
http://www.google.com/cse?q=gentiumcx=016640200293943433883:w-6slqs1kjgcof=FORID:0sa=Special+Search
OpenType fonts with ConTeXt and XeTeX with precise sizes in points. I
am trying to create a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Diego Depaoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/10 Neiaglov Dmitry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello there!
I was googling around,
you mis-googled :-)
http://www.google.com/cse?q=gentiumcx=016640200293943433883:w-6slqs1kjgcof=FORID:0sa=Special+Search
OpenType fonts
Dear all,
I have tried to upgrade ConTeXt using
sudo ctxtools --updatecontext
followed by
sudo texmfstart texexec --make en
and
sudo texmfstart texexec --make --xetex en
Following the upgrade a normal ConTeXt document runs perfectly but
when I run XeConTeXt through TeXShop I get the readout
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Charles Doherty wrote:
Dear all,
I have tried to upgrade ConTeXt using
sudo ctxtools --updatecontext
followed by
sudo texmfstart texexec --make en
and
sudo texmfstart texexec --make --xetex en
Following the upgrade a normal ConTeXt document runs
Thanks Mojca,
The problem is not the --xtx switch, but the lack of support for the
underlying (xdvipdfmx) driver.
Sorry, please remember I'm very far from there...
I was just meaning: the problem is in xetex engine?
I googled a bit and found the following slides:
Thanks Mojca, Hans,
ok, I've understood.
:)
-a-
On 3 Apr 2008, at 12:17, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Andrea Valle wrote:
Thanks Mojca,
The problem is not the --xtx switch, but the lack of support
for the
underlying (xdvipdfmx) driver.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Andrea Valle wrote:
Thanks Mojca,
The problem is not the --xtx switch, but the lack of support for the
underlying (xdvipdfmx) driver.
Sorry, please remember I'm very far from there...
I was just meaning: the problem is in xetex engine?
I googled a bit
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Andrea Valle wrote:
Thanks Mojca,
The problem is not the --xtx switch, but the lack of support for the
underlying (xdvipdfmx) driver.
Sorry, please remember I'm very far from there...
I was just meaning: the problem is in xetex
Sorry, but I would need a solution, or at least to know if there's
nothing to do.
Any hints?
Best
Thanks
-a-
On 31 Mar 2008, at 17:28, Andrea Valle wrote:
Dear all,
I'm using xetex with fun (as suggested and discussed on the mailing
list).
I'm revising a previously created document
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Andrea Valle wrote:
Dear all,
I'm using xetex with fun (as suggested and discussed on the mailing list).
I'm revising a previously created document which used attachment command.
(the one documented here:
Dear all,
I'm using xetex with fun (as suggested and discussed on the mailing
list).
I'm revising a previously created document which used attachment
command.
(the one documented here:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/
Verbatim_text#A_different_approach_to_formatting_and_code_colorization
)
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to let you know that XeTeX now supports both faking bold
and slanted (and the binaries on the garden minimals have that feature
already). It's generally a bad idea to use it, but in case that you
need it only for small portions of text (if you
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to let you know that XeTeX now supports both faking bold
and slanted (and the binaries on the garden minimals have that feature
already). It's generally a bad idea to use it, but in case
On 10 Mar 2008, at 1:50 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to let you know that XeTeX now supports both faking
bold
and slanted (and the binaries on the garden minimals have that
feature
already).
Hello,
I just wanted to let you know that XeTeX now supports both faking bold
and slanted (and the binaries on the garden minimals have that feature
already). It's generally a bad idea to use it, but in case that you
need it only for small portions of text (if you really have no other
way out),
Hi!
After moving to emacs I decided to settle on ConTeXt markup and want to
use Unicode engine.
Luatex is advancing very nicely and I wonder is there any reason to use
XeTeX over luatex, i.e. what features are missing (if any) in regards to
regarding font-handling in luatex in comparison with
Hi!
Is it possible to 'teach' AUCTeX to use xetex and/or luatex as TeX
engine for ConTeXt?
I see entry for Omega, but all the attempts for luatex/xetex do not
work :-(
Sincerely,
Gour
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am 05.11.2007 um 09:30 schrieb Dalyoung Jeong:
Mon Nov 5 16:56:15 graph.ssu.ac.kr xdv2pdf[21489] Error:
WARNING: Type1 font data returned by OFAStreamPSDownload isn't in
the correct format required by the Adobe Type 1Font Format
specification.
...
Output written on test-font.pdf (1
(Thanks Hans)
On 15 Sep 2007, at 18:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
Andrea Valle wrote:
\enableregime[utf]
this one is not needed, xetex is utf
Ok. I read some infos on the wiki but I was a bit confused.
So:
- if I encode in utf-8 I don't have to specify regime \enableregime[utf]
- if I encode
I was happy with old install, with bugs and xetex low level commands :-)
So, er, which strategy you gurus suggest?
Reinstall from scratch (old) TeXLive 2007 waiting for a new release?
I have that project of typesetting our journal which will start in a
month.
(I'd like to use system fonts,
On 9/16/07, Andrea Valle wrote:
On 15 Sep 2007, at 18:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
\enableregime[utf]
this one is not needed, xetex is utf
Ok. I read some infos on the wiki but I was a bit confused.
So:
- if I encode in utf-8 I don't have to specify regime \enableregime[utf]
- if I encode in
On 9/16/07, Andrea Valle wrote:
I was happy with old install, with bugs and xetex low level commands :-)
So, er, which strategy you gurus suggest?
Reinstall from scratch (old) TeXLive 2007 waiting for a new release?
That's one possibility, of course.
You can also download any ConTeXt
Really thanks a lot Mojca for the help.
I replaced the two files, I found two copies of font-ini.tex and
replaced them all.
Then:
texexec --make --all
texexec --make --all --xetex
(I guess the first is useless if I execute the second, isn't it?)
YES!
Alleluja, alleluja, it works, no
On 9/16/07, Andrea Valle wrote:
Then:
texexec --make --all
texexec --make --all --xetex
(I guess the first is useless if I execute the second, isn't it?)
You need the first one for pdfTeX and the second one for XeTeX. (If
you only work with XeTeX, then you don't need the first one, and for
Andrea Valle wrote:
(Thanks Hans)
On 15 Sep 2007, at 18:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
Andrea Valle wrote:
\enableregime[utf]
this one is not needed, xetex is utf
Ok. I read some infos on the wiki but I was a bit confused.
So:
- if I encode in utf-8 I don't have to specify regime
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Another possibility would be to use LuaTeX. It should work OK, but
again, there is no 100% guarantee (I created some newspaper with it
back in June and besides all the problems I had every now and then, it
was pre-alpha after all, our color laser at university still
Andrea Valle wrote:
Thanks Hans
texexec --xetex myfile.tex
is broken too:
** WARNING ** Invalid CMap
** ERROR ** pdf_ref_obj(): passed invalid object.
(what's the difference between --xtx and --xetex?)
depends on theversion of texexec; nowadays we always use dvipdfmx so
there
Thanks Hans
Hmm, if you mean it can depend of Optima (a part from the fact that
it has worked perfectly before)
the following breaks in the same way:
\enableregime[utf]
\setuppapersize[S6][S6]
\starttext
\startitemize
\item nome dell'insegnamento (es. $\to$ Storia del cinema)
\item settore
Andrea Valle wrote:
\enableregime[utf]
this one is not needed, xetex is utf
\starttext
\startitemize
\item nome dell'insegnamento (es. $\to$ Storia del cinema)
\item settore scientifico-disciplinare (SSD, es. $\to$ l-art/06)
\item numero di crediti (cfu, es. $\to$ 10)
\stopitemize
La
(I'm sorry for the delayed answer.)
On 9/15/07, Hans Hagen wrote:
Andrea Valle wrote:
** WARNING ** Invalid CMap
** ERROR ** pdf_ref_obj(): passed invalid object.
i wonder what that object is .. and who generates the ref, could be a
special but you do nothing special in the example so i'm
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
PS: to be honest, I'm still using the XeTeX version from TeXLive 2007
which is a bit old. I remember that Jonathan has promissed to look
into the problem described above some time ago (\font\a=rm-lmr12 vs.
\font\a=rm-lmr12 at 12pt), but I have no idea about what has
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
(I'm sorry for the delayed answer.)
On 9/15/07, Hans Hagen wrote:
Andrea Valle wrote:
** WARNING ** Invalid CMap
** ERROR ** pdf_ref_obj(): passed invalid object.
i wonder what that object is .. and who generates the ref, could be a
special but you do nothing special
Thanks Mojca,
Yes, having the standard mactex I had an old ConTeXt version.
On 13 Sep 2007, at 14:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
ctxtools --updatecontext
Done it. Now I'm using:
texexec --version
TeXExec | version 6.2.0 - 1997-2006
texec --check
2007.09.13 21:15
I've made also:
texexec
2007/9/14, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Mojca,
Yes, having the standard mactex I had an old ConTeXt version.
On 13 Sep 2007, at 14:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
ctxtools --updatecontext
Done it. Now I'm using:
texexec --version
TeXExec | version 6.2.0 - 1997-2006
texec
On 9/14/07, Andrea Valle wrote:
YES.
Thanks Mojca, Wolfgang. Stretching problem solved updating ConTeXt.
Great! Do you still experience any speed problems now? (I have a
feeling that Hans has removed dependency on ImageMagic, but I didn't
try to uninstall it to check if that was true.)
I also
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
