Re: [NTG-context] ppchTeX

Dear Alan, thanks a lot for fixed code. Could you point out where to find the updated manual for MkIV? Cheers, Henri On 07/07/2016 08:26 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:23:57 +0200 > Henri Menke wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> I just wanted to check whether

Re: [NTG-context] ppchTeX

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:23:57 +0200 Henri Menke wrote: > Dear list, > > I just wanted to check whether chemical structures typeset in ConTeXt > can be exported as XML. Therefore I wanted to setup a simple example > with ppchTeX. I copied example 3.1 from the manual [1] >

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX: bonds overlaps the radicals groups

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:37:27 +0100 DesdeChaves wrote: > I try inserting several \chemical[ONE, .2MOV1] statements in some key > places, but without success. Can you provide me a very simple example? The idea is to draw the bond, then move, then the atom: \chemical

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX: bonds overlaps the radicals groups

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:00:23 +0100 DesdeChaves wrote: > Some time ago I wrote the code attached to create random branched > organic molecules. However, with recent versions of Context the > carbon-carbon bonds overwrites the radicals. How can I fix this? The mkiv

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex, color and mkiv

On Friday 19 November 2010 09:52:47 Jörg Hagmann wrote: From a thread on this list (May 2009: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20090512.132914.5c29b5f4.en.html) I gather that whereas colouring a whole molecule works fine, colouring groups within a chemical structure is not yet fully

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

Hi Alan, Thanks for the explanations. Try style=sans. We also have color= and rulecolor=. syle=sans works, but not for aligned atoms, e.g. \SL{OH}; a bug? For the time being, I can use \SL{\ss OH}. There are some problems still in mkiv, notably with CARBON, NEWMANSTAGGER, NEWMANECLIPSE,

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:54:23 Jörg Hagmann wrote: syle=sans works, but not for aligned atoms, e.g. \SL{OH}; a bug? For the time being, I can use \SL{\ss OH}. There are indeed bugs in the use of \SL{} under mkiv. For example, one currently needs to use \SL{\small CH$_2$} rather

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

On Wednesday 17 November 2010 12:37:34 Jörg Hagmann wrote: I just started using (and liking) ppchtex, and I have a few questions: 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is fit and there are dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? [left=,top=] I'll look into your

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

Thanks, Alan. On 11/17/10 2:13 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is fit and there are dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? [left=,top=] This gives absolute values. I would prefer something giving me fit + dimension I'll look into

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16:21:49 Jörg Hagmann wrote: Thanks, Alan. On 11/17/10 2:13 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is fit and there are dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? [left=,top=] This gives absolute values. I

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX with PSTricks option

Am 07.05.2010 20:38, schrieb Marius: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals#Installation_and_use_on_Windows I downloaded context-setup-mswin.zip, unzipped it to C:\Program Files(x86)\context and ran first-setup.bat --context=current. Now I have a Directory C:\Program\context. In the

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX with PSTricks option

On 7-5-2010 9:12, Alan BRASLAU wrote: ppchtex has been rewritten for conTeXt using luatex and line drawing has been considerably improved. However, I do not believe that this version will (ever) be adapted for use with LaTeX. Perhaps Hans can give you a better answer. indeed the mkiv

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX with PSTricks option

On Friday 07 May 2010 10:23:20 Hans Hagen wrote: On 7-5-2010 9:12, Alan BRASLAU wrote: ppchtex has been rewritten for conTeXt using luatex and line drawing has been considerably improved. However, I do not believe that this version will (ever) be adapted for use with LaTeX. Perhaps Hans

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX with PSTricks option

On 7-5-2010 8:12, Helge Kruse wrote: Am 07.05.2010 13:04, schrieb Alan BRASLAU: On Friday 07 May 2010 10:23:20 Hans Hagen wrote: On 7-5-2010 9:12, Alan BRASLAU wrote: indeed the mkiv reimplementation will not be backported to latex as it involved a combination of tex, lua and mp now and is

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

On 23-4-2010 7:37, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h32, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl a écrit : btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv kernel As I'm not using ConTeXt for the moment (but it

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le vendredi 23/04/10 à 09h34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit : we have context mkii and context mkiv; the new ppchtex module is for mkiv and uses a combination of lua, tex and mp; as context and latex are quite different (and even more when you consider mkiv) the new ppchtex code targets

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le dimanche 18/04/10 à 23h23, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit : can you check if your ppchtex.noc file has \input supp-mis.mkii \let\writestatus\undefined \input syst-gen.mkii \input syst-fnt.mkii i.e loads the mkii files? Yes, those lines are present in the file ppchtex.noc:

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 13h41, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit : can you download the cont-tmf.zip file and unzip it in the texmd-dist root? It works! Well almost: no compilation trouble, but an empty page with the following MCE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 15h21, Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : no compilation trouble Sorry, no error but the following message in the .log file: ppchtex: the {}{}-alternative is not permitted here -- Denis

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

On 22-4-2010 3:30, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 15h21, Denis Bitouzédbito...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : no compilation trouble Sorry, no error but the following message in the .log file: ppchtex: the {}{}-alternative is not permitted here so use the [][] variant instead

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h42, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit : so use the [][] variant instead ({}{} is for inline) OK, that's better :) But the following MCE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en} \begin{document} \startchemical \chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O]

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h51, Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr a écrit : But the following MCE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en} \begin{document} \startchemical \chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O] \stopchemical \end{document} leads to the messages: [...]

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

On 22-4-2010 7:09, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Are those changes: 1. {}{} rather than [][], 2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not, 3. etc. documented somewhere? sure, in the ppchtex manual; indeed {}{} is used inline (in math mode or not) and [][] between start/stop pairs Hans

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

On 22-4-2010 7:09, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Are those changes: 1. {}{} rather than [][], 2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not, 3. etc. btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv kernel

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h32, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit : btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv kernel As I'm not using ConTeXt for the moment (but it may change! :), what are the

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h30, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl a écrit : sure, in the ppchtex manual; indeed {}{} is used inline (in math mode or not) and [][] between start/stop pairs Well, sorry for my misreading... -- Denis

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

On 17-4-2010 11:10, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Hello, thanks to contributors of this list I was able to use ppchtex with LaTeX when I encountered a \writestatus: Undefined control sequence problem: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/044672.html Everything went well (though I have a little

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Hello everybody, with a fresh TeX Live 2009 distribution, I cannot compile old files because of \writestatus which seems to be undefined. For instance: \listfiles \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 09h25, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Sorry, this is ConTeXt mailing list, not LaTeX mailing list . OK, but it seems to be a related to ConTeXt problem: [bito...@drums ~]$ kpsewhich m-pictex.sty

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 09h25, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Sorry, this is ConTeXt mailing list, not LaTeX  mailing list . OK, but it seems to be a related to ConTeXt problem: [bito...@drums ~]$

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h01, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Can you post a small example with context mkii ? Well, maybe the problem comes from TeX Live 2009, since: $ tlmgr list | grep context i collection-context: ConTeXt format i context: The ConTeXt macro package. i

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h01, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Can you post a small example with context mkii ? with: $ more test-context.tex \starttext Hello World! \stoptext I get: $ context

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h20, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : $ texexec test-context It is OK for the MCE Hello world I gave earlier, except the following warning: pdfTeX warning: pdftex: no GlyphToUnicode entry has been inserted yet! The same occurs with chemical formulas. So

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Denis Bitouzé dbito...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h20, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : $ texexec  test-context It is OK for the MCE Hello world I gave earlier, except the following warning: pdfTeX warning: pdftex: no

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h20, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : $ texexec test-context It is OK for the MCE Hello world I gave earlier, except the following warning: pdfTeX warning: pdftex: no GlyphToUnicode entry has been inserted yet! This

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Taco Hoekwater wrote: Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h20, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : $ texexec test-context It is OK for the MCE Hello world I gave earlier, except the following warning: pdfTeX warning: pdftex: no GlyphToUnicode entry has been

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: Taco Hoekwater wrote: Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h20, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : $ texexec  test-context It is OK for the MCE Hello world I gave earlier, except the following

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h55, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Can you also post a small example with with chemical formulas so I can check it with latest mkiv minimals ? Here it is: \usemodule[pictex,chemic] \starttext \startchemical \chemical[SIX,B,R,RZ][1,2,3,4,5,6]

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Hi, luigi scarso wrote: This pdftex warning can be ignored. It used to be present in luatex as well, but it was removed in version 0.37.0. OK -- but what does it means ? To the best of my knowledge, it only means that no ToUnicode values have been set up using \pdfglyphtounicode yet at the

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Denis Bitouzé wrote: loading : ConTeXt Support Macros / Miscellaneous (2004.10.26) ) (/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf-dist/tex/context/base/syst-gen.mkii ! Undefined control sequence. l.4441 what happens if in syst-gen.mkii you change around line 4438 \let\writestatus\normalwritestatus

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 09h25, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Sorry, this is ConTeXt mailing list, not LaTeX mailing list . OK, but it seems to be a related to ConTeXt problem: sure, an dit involves some generic context modules that are used in ppchtex

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \writestatus: Undefined control sequence

Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le mercredi 04/11/09 à 10h55, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com a écrit : Can you also post a small example with with chemical formulas so I can check it with latest mkiv minimals ? Here it is: \usemodule[pictex,chemic] \starttext \startchemical

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex experience

On Monday 20 April 2009 17:27:42 Helge Kruse wrote: Hello, I need to write some chemical strucutures in LaTeX and dont know, what is the best tools to do it. The structures are crown ether and cryptands. Yes, and I am unexperienced. 1) What would be the way to write a [18]crown-6

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: i split ppchtex in mkii/mkiv (and included the fixes) so we can improve things eventually can you check if it still runs ok (beta zip on website) Hans Works correctly (bonds in red, atoms in black): \usemodule[chemic] \setupchemical[rulecolor=red] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

On Wednesday 13 May 2009 10:33:18 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: Works correctly (bonds in red, atoms in black): \usemodule[chemic] \setupchemical[rulecolor=red] \starttext \startchemical \chemical[ONE,SB,Z0][C] \stopchemical \stoptext However, the following

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 10:33:18 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: Works correctly (bonds in red, atoms in black): \usemodule[chemic] \setupchemical[rulecolor=red] \starttext \startchemical \chemical[ONE,SB,Z0][C] \stopchemical \stoptext However, the

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: \startchemical \color[red]{\chemical[ONE,SB,Z0][C]} \stopchemical % text C is offset... add a % after the } (maybe we should ignore endofline, i.e. make a mkiv variant and extend/maintain that) -

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: No, ppchtex is not dead... I would like to use color. 1. color= and rulecolor= does not appear to be implemented (mkiv)... 2. how can one change the color of the bonds? 3. using \color[red]{} causes the text to be offset. minimal example: \setupcolors[state=start]

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: No, ppchtex is not dead... I would like to use color. 1. color= and rulecolor= does not appear to be implemented (mkiv)... 2. how can one change the color of the bonds? 3. using \color[red]{} causes the text to be offset. minimal example: \setupcolors[state=start]

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: No, ppchtex is not dead... i split ppchtex in mkii/mkiv (and included the fixes) so we can improve things eventually can you check if it still runs ok (beta zip on website) Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

i split ppchtex in mkii/mkiv (and included the fixes) so we can improve things eventually can you check if it still runs ok (beta zip on website) Hans Unzipped cont-tmf.zip on top of my minimals installation and ran context on my current working documents: system : module

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

i split ppchtex in mkii/mkiv (and included the fixes) so we can improve things eventually can you check if it still runs ok (beta zip on website) Hans Works correctly (bonds in red, atoms in black): \usemodule[chemic] \setupchemical[rulecolor=red] \starttext \startchemical

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex color

Alan BRASLAU wrote: i split ppchtex in mkii/mkiv (and included the fixes) so we can improve things eventually can you check if it still runs ok (beta zip on website) Hans Unzipped cont-tmf.zip on top of my minimals installation and ran context on my current working documents: system

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex experience

2009/4/20 Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net: I need to write some chemical strucutures in LaTeX and dont know, what is the best tools to do it. The structures are crown ether and cryptands. Yes, and I am unexperienced. 1) What would be the way to write a [18]crown-6

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX and LaTeX

Hi Helge, Thanks for your kind reply. I have a MikTeX system installed on Windows XP. The context is part of the installation. Although I think that all packages mentioned below are installed I get some error messages in the log. The dvi output is generated, but the errors are strange.

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTEX: Reaction troubles

per.maier wrote: Hi, I already sent this message to the ppchtex mailing list, but apparently it's dead since a few years, so I hope you can help me with my problem. When I run this through context the output looks ok, but that may not mean much as context no longer uses pictex for

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex german language compiling problems

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:51:27 +0100 Martin Scholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I'm new to ConTeXt and found out how nice it is to construct coverpages. It's even better for the whole document. So it would be nice to have an opportunity to include the whole procedure into an LaTeXe

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex

Johannes Werner wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Johannes Werner wrote: hi everyone, i want to use PPCHTEX. when i process my .tex-file with texexec i get the message: . specials : fdf loaded ) specials : fdf,tpd loaded \openout6 = `chemie-mpgraph.mp'. Randomizer initialized to

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex

Johannes Werner wrote: hi everyone, i want to use PPCHTEX. when i process my .tex-file with texexec i get the message: . specials : fdf loaded ) specials : fdf,tpd loaded \openout6 = `chemie-mpgraph.mp'. Randomizer initialized to 1275417501. [MP to PDF]

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex

Hans Hagen wrote: Johannes Werner wrote: hi everyone, i want to use PPCHTEX. when i process my .tex-file with texexec i get the message: . specials : fdf loaded ) specials : fdf,tpd loaded \openout6 = `chemie-mpgraph.mp'. Randomizer initialized to 1275417501. [MP to PDF]

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex

Hi Johannes, I looked at your coding. The use module line has two typo's It should be \usemodule[pictex,chemic] The statements are not complete i.e. you forgot the \stopcombination. Further when starting a combination one needs to give the number of rows and columns e.g. [2*3]. with only [6]

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTeX Bug?

Am Mi, den 29.09.2004 schrieb Mojca Miklavec um 00:40: (there's no way to make such a trivial thing as a thetraedral or trigonal angle - 109.5 and 120 degrees). Well, it is possible by abusing the basal structures ONE and SIX. As an example for a 120 degree angle using SIX see the sample some

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTeX Bug?

In my opinion - it's not only its complexity preventing the users from using it, but also it's insufficient flexibility. As long as I understood the manual (and tried to draw some formulas), it is possible to create a certain subset of images, which covers the most needs, but certainly not all

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTeX Bug?

Am 14.09.2004 um 11:17 schrieb Hans Hagen: On TeX-D-L (german ML) was last week a dicussion about a PPCHTeX bug (at least with LaTeX), it seems that the file ppchtex.tex lost its tail (ca. 3kB). I told the user to ask at the PPCHTeX Mailing list, but he only got a message, that the list was

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTeX broken

Peter Münster wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Tobias Burnus wrote: If I do a dvips -Ppdf test.dvi I get the following warning: dvips: Could not find figure file ./test-mpgraph.4000; continuing dvips: Could not find figure file ./test-mpgraph.3999; continuing dvips: Could not find figure file

Re: [NTG-context] PPCHTeX broken

Hello, Peter Münster wrote: PPCHTeX seems to be broken in the latest ConTeXt beta version. Here an example (copied from the manual): If I do a dvips -Ppdf test.dvi I get the following warning: dvips: Could not find figure file ./test-mpgraph.4000; continuing dvips: Could not find figure file