Le 13 janvier à 23:47:12 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| Aditya Mahajan wrote:
| :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
| this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
|
| \catcode`\_ = 11
| or ...
| \nonknuthmode
| (there's also
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
:) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
\catcode`\_ = 11
or ...
\nonknuthmode
(there's also \donkunthmode -)
-
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
:) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
\catcode`\_ = 11
or ...
\nonknuthmode
(there's also \donkunthmode -)
Hey, somehow never noticed
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Gour wrote:
Yesterday I played a bit with emacs' muse mode which has option to
'publish' to ConTeXt, but its output was wailing when texeexec-ing due
to use of \textunderscore (option in muse).
Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine.
Today I
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:59:39 -0500 (EST)
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine.
See https://mail.gna.org/public/muse-el-discuss/2008-01/msg1.html
thread.
:) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:59:39 -0500 (EST)
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does \textunderscore wail? \textunderscore should work fine.
See https://mail.gna.org/public/muse-el-discuss/2008-01/msg1.html
thread.
This is just a mistake of the
