xt here}}
> \stopformula
>
> I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example:
>
> \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> ...does not work.
>
> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in the
> ContextGarde
:
> >>
> >>> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...)
> in
> >>> the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to
> find
> >>> any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance.
> &g
ank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> > ...does not work.
> >
> > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to
> find
> > any user-supplied arguments for increasing this verti
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 18.12.2023 um 21:55:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote:
The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
any user
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote:
>
> > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
> > any user-supplied
pformula
>
> I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example:
>
> \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> ...does not work.
>
> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> the ContextGarden wiki seems to be ver
:
\underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
...does not work.
The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance
; > \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \stopTEXpage
> >
> > I'll add a 'force fix in spite of extensible being present' in mkiv. In
> > lmtx we always fix
{OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$}
\stopTEXpage
I'll add a 'force fix in spite of extensible being present' in mkiv. In
lmtx we always fix also because we drop in nicer
box{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$
\ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$}
\stopTEXpage
I'll add a 'force fix in spite of extensible being present' in mkiv. In
lmtx we always fix also because we drop in nicer shapes (watch the round
tips in lm and fancy tips in antykwa) and concluded that fonts will
remain
fc resizing in math mode
The only mention of anything similar happened back in 2009 (but then again this
was with mkii). There may be more similar issues in the list. I just didn't
have the time to look for it.
https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ntg.nl/msg40224.html
But anyhow, the follow
rnative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+
It's very puzzling...
but I'll try to get myself back together, by ignoring
everything up to the next `;'. Please insert a semicolon
now in front of anything that you don't want me to delete.
(See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.)
[1]
51
52 $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket
% vfenced]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[top]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blan
thstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \
tive=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [top]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [bottom]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \starttext
>
> $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebracket
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d}
gt; \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> % so far
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [both] % vfenced]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
or=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+
in a next version you can do this:
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set
for
\overbrace
\overparent
\overbracket
\overbar
\underbrace
\underparent
\underbracket
\underbar
\doublebrace
\doubleparent
\doublebracket
21 matches
Mail list logo
