On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:03:35 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> > I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to
> > \frac...
>
> and because of the many {} you then need you get these mismatch
> errors ... but, you can make
>
>
Hi,
Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael.
Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default].
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first one is weird
when using \frac and
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 17:45, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
> Otared Kavian wrote:
>
>> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
>> one is weird when using \frac and
>
> I have been massacred on this
On 6/7/2017 5:12 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi,
Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael.
Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default].
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
Otared Kavian wrote:
> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
> one is weird when using \frac and
I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...
On 6/7/2017 5:45 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
Otared Kavian wrote:
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
one is weird when using \frac and
I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...
On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
this might be a matter of taste.
look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
is to "high", while it looks better on the second line.
On 06/07/2017 10:09 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> If I runt "mtxrunjit --autogenerate --script check b.tex", I get the
>> following message:
>>
>> no error
>>
>> Is there no way to check also the files loaded by the main source?
>
> i just
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:11:14 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
(but i have to admit that i normally just run files and redo after
fixing an error, running is fast enough)
My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source
files and it actually loads five source
On 06/07/2017 03:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Does anyone know how the align key in \setupexternalfigure works?
>
> it doesn't (no clue what it should be doing anyway)
Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
grph-inc.mkiv includes the following
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this might be a matter of taste.
>>>
>>> look at the output of (attached).
On 6/7/2017 8:23 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/07/2017 03:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Does anyone know how the align key in \setupexternalfigure works?
it doesn't (no clue what it should be doing anyway)
Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
On 6/7/2017 8:11 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source
files and it actually loads five source files, the problem is having to
check the files individually.
in that case i always run the individual files independently when
editing
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 02:09:48 -0600, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/06/2017 10:56 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
[...]
Would it be any way to make ConTeXt report that \linenote{ hasn’t been
closed?
Just check your file
On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/06/2017 10:56 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
[...]
Would it be any way to make ConTeXt report that \linenote{ hasn’t been
closed?
Just check your file before running it:
mtxrun --autogenerate --script check test.tex
Running
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mikael,
>>>
>>> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac
>>>
On 06/07/2017 09:08 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 8:11 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source
>> files and it actually loads five source files, the problem is having to
>> check the files individually.
>
> in that case i always
On 6/7/2017 9:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:11:14 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
(but i have to admit that i normally just run files and redo after
fixing an error, running is fast enough)
My question here isn’t about speed. If a
On 06/07/2017 10:16 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically
>> helps a lot.
>
> Scite: Ctrl-0
> Notepad++: Ctrl-Shift-0
>
> (new n++ setup
On 06/07/2017 09:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
> [...]
> As a matter of workflow, I would just check each \input when editing it,
> don't see the need to check them all over and over - but maybe you have
> some huge collaborative project with lots of \inputs frequently
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically
helps a lot.
Scite: Ctrl-0
Notepad++: Ctrl-Shift-0
(new n++ setup for context currently under development)
Idris
--
Idris Samawi Hamid, Professor
On 06/07/2017 09:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 8:23 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> \c!align=\v!none, % New, for Tacos extremely large graphics.
>>
>> Sorry for asking, but would it be possible that the key should set
>> alignment for externalfigures and there is a bug in
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mikael,
>>
>> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac
>> yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample:
>>
>> %%% begin
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:33:05 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/07/2017 10:16 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez
wrote:
And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically
helps a
On 6/7/2017 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
In 2017.06.06 13:22 something is still not correct.
i mentioned that you need a new engine (the garden has 1.0.5 binafies
for windows but other platforms need to be generated)
Hans
On 06/07/2017 11:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> sure it's no big deal to write such a script but in decades of tex i
> never felt the need
I wrote a small script for my Linux machine (check-context.sh), to be
able to check a single file:
source $HOME/ctxbeta/tex/setuptex
mtxrunjit
On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\setupexternalfigure[location=default, align=middle]
\starttext
\dontleavehmode\externalfigure[cow.pdf]
\externalfigure[cow.pdf]
\stoptext
As you can see, \dontleavehmode makes no
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this might be a matter of taste.
>
> look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
> is to "high", while it looks better on the second line. From
> setup-en.pdf it looks like the
28 matches
Mail list logo