Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:03:35 +0200 Hans Hagen wrote: > > I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to > > \frac... > > and because of the many {} you then need you get these mismatch > errors ... but, you can make > >

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi, Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael. Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without \setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default]. The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first one is weird when using \frac and

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Meer, Hans van der
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 17:45, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200 > Otared Kavian wrote: > >> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first >> one is weird when using \frac and > > I have been massacred on this

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 5:12 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi, Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael. Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without \setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default]. The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200 Otared Kavian wrote: > The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first > one is weird when using \frac and I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 5:45 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200 Otared Kavian wrote: The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first one is weird when using \frac and I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, this might be a matter of taste. look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root is to "high", while it looks better on the second line.

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 10:09 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> If I runt "mtxrunjit --autogenerate --script check b.tex", I get the >> following message: >> >> no error >> >> Is there no way to check also the files loaded by the main source? > > i just

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:11:14 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: (but i have to admit that i normally just run files and redo after fixing an error, running is fast enough) My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source files and it actually loads five source

Re: [NTG-context] aligning external figures

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 03:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> Does anyone know how the align key in \setupexternalfigure works? > > it doesn't (no clue what it should be doing anyway) Many thanks for your reply, Hans. grph-inc.mkiv includes the following

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> this might be a matter of taste. >>> >>> look at the output of (attached).

Re: [NTG-context] aligning external figures

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 8:23 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 06/07/2017 03:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: [...] Does anyone know how the align key in \setupexternalfigure works? it doesn't (no clue what it should be doing anyway) Many thanks for your reply, Hans.

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 8:11 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source files and it actually loads five source files, the problem is having to check the files individually. in that case i always run the individual files independently when editing

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 02:09:48 -0600, Hans Hagen wrote: On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 06/06/2017 10:56 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: [...] Would it be any way to make ConTeXt report that \linenote{ hasn’t been closed? Just check your file

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 06/06/2017 10:56 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: [...] Would it be any way to make ConTeXt report that \linenote{ hasn’t been closed? Just check your file before running it: mtxrun --autogenerate --script check test.tex Running

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

2017-06-07 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mikael, >>> >>> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac >>>

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 09:08 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/7/2017 8:11 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source >> files and it actually loads five source files, the problem is having to >> check the files individually. > > in that case i always

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 9:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:11:14 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: (but i have to admit that i normally just run files and redo after fixing an error, running is fast enough) My question here isn’t about speed. If a

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 10:16 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > >> And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically >> helps a lot. > > Scite: Ctrl-0 > Notepad++: Ctrl-Shift-0 > > (new n++ setup

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 09:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: > [...] > As a matter of workflow, I would just check each \input when editing it, > don't see the need to check them all over and over - but maybe you have > some huge collaborative project with lots of \inputs frequently

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically helps a lot. Scite: Ctrl-0 Notepad++: Ctrl-Shift-0 (new n++ setup for context currently under development) Idris -- Idris Samawi Hamid, Professor

Re: [NTG-context] aligning external figures

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 09:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/7/2017 8:23 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> \c!align=\v!none, % New, for Tacos extremely large graphics. >> >> Sorry for asking, but would it be possible that the key should set >> alignment for externalfigures and there is a bug in

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

2017-06-07 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: >> >> Hi Mikael, >> >> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac >> yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample: >> >> %%% begin

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:33:05 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 06/07/2017 10:16 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically helps a

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/7/2017 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: In 2017.06.06 13:22 something is still not correct. i mentioned that you need a new engine (the garden has 1.0.5 binafies for windows but other platforms need to be generated) Hans

Re: [NTG-context] how to prevent stupid typos?

2017-06-07 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 06/07/2017 11:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > sure it's no big deal to write such a script but in decades of tex i > never felt the need I wrote a small script for my Linux machine (check-context.sh), to be able to check a single file: source $HOME/ctxbeta/tex/setuptex mtxrunjit

Re: [NTG-context] aligning external figures

2017-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have the following sample: \setupexternalfigure[location=default, align=middle] \starttext \dontleavehmode\externalfigure[cow.pdf] \externalfigure[cow.pdf] \stoptext As you can see, \dontleavehmode makes no

Re: [NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

2017-06-07 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > Hi, > > this might be a matter of taste. > > look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root > is to "high", while it looks better on the second line. From > setup-en.pdf it looks like the