Hello,
I have tested those „new“ commands for footnotes and it seems some of
them don't work properly. I like footnotes' numbers aligned to the
left side of the main text. On wiki is:
\setupnotation[footnote][location=left,width=1cm]
\setupnote[footnote][location=page,numbercommand=]
This
On 03/19/2012 08:55 AM, Honza Hejzl wrote:
Is the work still in progress or am I missing something?
In the first place, you're missing an example...
Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Am 19.03.2012 um 00:29 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is
Am 18.03.2012 um 23:10 schrieb Alan Braslau:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:59:17 +0100
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2. Many of the \define… and \setup… commands are now auto generated
from \installcommandhandler which generates only one setup-command
which can be
I just bought the new Lucida font from TUG and installed it in my local texmf
under fonts/opentype/bh/lucidaot/
Then I did:
mtxrun --generate
mtxrun --script font --reload
to be sure the new install will be picked up by ConTeXt mkiv.
I think I did read somewhere that mkiv will prefer otf
Am 19.03.2012 um 09:38 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
I just bought the new Lucida font from TUG and installed it in my local texmf
under fonts/opentype/bh/lucidaot/
Then I did:
mtxrun --generate
mtxrun --script font --reload
to be sure the new install will be picked up by ConTeXt mkiv.
Hello,
since ConTeXt supports form fields in PDFs, I wonder whether the
fields for digital signatures are available as well. If not, please
consider this a feature request/wish :-)
I received an internal document some time ago that represented a form
and was separated into three
Am 19.03.2012 um 10:38 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Wolfgang, thanks.
I didn't know about the new identifier lucidaot. The TUG documentation seems
not to mention its use for ConTeXt. The otf now loads.
The sample document for the new fonts was typeset with LaTeX and Hans missed
the new
Am 19.03.2012 um 08:55 schrieb Honza Hejzl:
Hello,
I have tested those „new“ commands for footnotes and it seems some of
them don't work properly. I like footnotes' numbers aligned to the
left side of the main text. On wiki is:
\setupnotation[footnote][location=left,width=1cm]
Wow, it is pretty confusing. The last week before I updated mkiv I
used to use it for numbers aligned with the left margin of the text.
It means the same like serried version but with the textblock of
footnotes aligned indented:
TEXT
169 sdfsf
sdfsdfdf
170 sdfsdf
Now it just
On 19 mrt. 2012, at 10:01, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The new version of the lucida fonts use different names for the typescript, we
have now:
- “lucida” for the old type1 version,
- “lucidaot” for the new opentype version and
- “lucidanova” as alternative name for the opentype version.
The
Aha, I've got it:
\setupnotation[footnote][width=2em,alternative=]
This works now. It does the same as location=page before my update.
Thanks, Honza
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Am 19.03.2012 um 11:12 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
On 19 mrt. 2012, at 10:01, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The new version of the lucida fonts use different names for the typescript, we have now:
- “lucida” for the old type1 version,
- “lucidaot” for the new opentype version and
- “lucidanova”
I would like to use, for example,
\setuphead [chapter] [after={\placecontent\blank}]
But sometimes, I would like to use something like
\startchapter [number=no,incrementnumber=no,after=,
title={Conclusions of the first part}]
\stopchapter
1. I request to have after=, (and other setup
Am 19.03.2012 um 12:45 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
I would like to use, for example,
\setuphead [chapter] [after={\placecontent\blank}]
But sometimes, I would like to use something like
\startchapter [number=no,incrementnumber=no,after=,
title={Conclusions of the first part}]
Wolfgang,
Thank you for the suggestions.
However, I have tried many such, things...
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:50:14 +0100
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 um 12:45 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
I would like to use, for example,
\setuphead [chapter]
I'm replying off-list. I think that this might be on the list of
forbidden features (one would have to pay to adobe to be able to allow
signing document with TeX).
Mojca
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:27, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hello,
since ConTeXt supports form fields in PDFs, I wonder
Am 19.03.2012 um 16:16 schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
Wolfgang,
Thank you for the suggestions.
However, I have tried many such, things…
Is this what you want?
\setuphead[title][incrementnumber=list]
\setuplist[title][width=2em] % default value for chapter entry
On Monday, March 19, 2012, at 16:41 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I'm replying off-list. I think that this might be on the list of
forbidden features (one would have to pay to adobe to be able to allow
signing document with TeX).
Mojca
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:27, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm replying off-list. I think that this might be on the list of
forbidden features (one would have to pay to adobe to be able to allow
signing document with TeX).
Mojca
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:27,
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:27 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Under this part was a signature field
I could click which made Adobe Reader prompt for a digital
certificate.
Great idea. It would be great if one could use any OpenPGP key.
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP
On 19-3-2012 16:41, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I'm replying off-list. I think that this might be on the list of
forbidden features (one would have to pay to adobe to be able to allow
signing document with TeX).
Is this much different from https certificates? Adobe probably runs a
verification
On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote:
I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I
suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one.
not that probable
One other thing that I should have made more clear, this only happens
when I insert the aforementioned line correction
On 19-3-2012 00:25, Kip Warner wrote:
The good news is that this is probably what I need. The bad news is
luatex completely blows itself to pieces, allocating memory until the
system crashes.
Packaging itemizes are on a todo list as I sometimes need it myself, but
it has a low priority
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 17:51, luigi scarso wrote:
I'm not sure about it, but I'm tempted to believe that digitally
signing PDFs might be one of forbidden functionality that requires
you to buy a licence for Acrobat.
Why ? As long it is described in the ISO standard, it can be
implemented
On 19-3-2012 22:08, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 17:51, luigi scarso wrote:
I'm not sure about it, but I'm tempted to believe that digitally
signing PDFs might be one of forbidden functionality that requires
you to buy a licence for Acrobat.
Why ? As long it is described
Hi,
are subfootnotes not yet rewritten, or did the syntax change?
The following example expects 2.a but gives 2.1:
\definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
\definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers]
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:49 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 19-3-2012 00:29, Kip Warner wrote:
I've cc'd the luatex user mailing list since this is probably, I
suppose, a luatex issue more than a ConTeXt one.
not that probable
Actually highly probably, since the seg fault is raised in
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:50 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
Packaging itemizes are on a todo list as I sometimes need it myself, but
it has a low priority
Ok, but I thought they were already packaged with context?
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:17 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Make a example because this works:
\starttext
%\dorecurse{2}{\input tufte\par}
\dorecurse{3}{\input tufte\par}
\startitemize[before={\startlinecorrection[blank]},after=
\stoplinecorrection]
\dorecurse{4}{\startitem \input
Am 19.03.2012 um 22:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
are subfootnotes not yet rewritten, or did the syntax change?
The following example expects 2.a but gives 2.1:
\definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][]
\definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers]
Am 20.03.2012 um 02:04 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:17 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Make a example because this works:
\starttext
%\dorecurse{2}{\input tufte\par}
\dorecurse{3}{\input tufte\par}
\startitemize[before={\startlinecorrection[blank]},after=
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The problem is the empty second argument.
\startitemize[before=\startlinecorrection,after=\stoplinecorrection][]
When you pass two arguments with \startitemize the first argument os for
keywords (e.g. packed or fit)
and second
Am 20.03.2012 um 06:31 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The problem is the empty second argument.
\startitemize[before=\startlinecorrection,after=\stoplinecorrection][]
When you pass two arguments with \startitemize the first argument os for
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it.
It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it
went about doing it. It should not have to take down the entire
operating system to indicate to the user that
35 matches
Mail list logo
