more empty lines in your source)
\defineregister[symbol][symbols]
\starttext
\startitemize[1] \item test \stopitemize
\stoptext
as you redefine \symbol to be a register entry resolving \symbol[1]
inside the itemize does not work any more as expected
so, when defining commands
- avoid built
in on
the error (tip: use a bit more empty lines in your source)
\defineregister[symbol][symbols]
\starttext
\startitemize[1] \item test \stopitemize
\stoptext
Thank you VERY much Hans. I'm charmed. Thanks. I was crazy finding the
error. I was convinced that it was a silly thing.
as you
Xan wrote:
Really, I did not know that. It's a messy thing that we could not define
what we like ;-)
it's the nature of a tex macro package; ok, i can add some strict
testing for in in mkiv but even then it might just be that someone who
knows th einternals (like wolfgang or wolfgang or
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Xan wrote:
Really, I did not know that. It's a messy thing that we could not define
what we like ;-)
it's the nature of a tex macro package; ok, i can add some strict testing
for in in mkiv but even then it might just be
Am 23.07.2009 um 16:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
2) define your macros inside
\startPrivate[namespace]
...
\stopPrivate
And how do you want to access the macros in your document?
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 16:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
2) define your macros inside
\startPrivate[namespace]
...
\stopPrivate
And how do you want to access the macros in your document?
by namespace ?
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Xan wrote:
Really, I did not know that. It's a messy thing that we could not define
what we like ;-)
it's the nature of a tex macro package; ok, i can add some strict testing
for in
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:05 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 16:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
2) define your macros inside
\startPrivate[namespace]
...
\stopPrivate
And how do you want to access the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Xan wrote:
Really, I did not know that. It's a messy thing that we could not define
what we like ;-)
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:05 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 16:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
2) define
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:05 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I think an easier thing to do will be to follow latex's style of
\newcommand and \renewcommand. That is, all \definecommands should
check if the macro is previously defined or not. If it is defined,
issue a warning or an error.
There is
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:16 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:05 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:16 schrieb luigi scarso:
hmm, where do you see the problem ?
As programmer it's no problem to use a namespace for macros but how
do you convince users to use them, should they write
\startprivate[foo]
\definenote[footnote][...]
\defineregister[index][...]
En/na Hans Hagen ha escrit:
Xan wrote:
Really, I did not know that. It's a messy thing that we could not
define what we like ;-)
it's the nature of a tex macro package; ok, i can add some strict
testing for in in mkiv but even then it might just be that someone who
knows th einternals
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:16 schrieb luigi scarso:
hmm, where do you see the problem ?
As programmer it's no problem to use a namespace for macros but how
do you convince users to use them,
it's up
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:05 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I think an easier thing to do will be to follow latex's style of
\newcommand and \renewcommand. That is, all \definecommands should check if
the macro is previously defined or not. If it is defined,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 23.07.2009 um 17:05 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I think an easier thing to do will be to follow latex's style of
\newcommand and \renewcommand. That is, all
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\def\defineSOMETHING%
{\dodoubleargument\dodefineSOMETHING}
\def\dodefineSOMETHING[#1][#2]%
{\setvalue{#1}{\dododefineSOMETHING[#2]}
some do, but sometimes redefinition is quite legal; it happens that
'note' and 'symbol' are pretty core
the convention (as
Hi,
Sorry for perhaps silly question, but I receive and error for this code:
\subsubsubject{El problema de la paraula}
\startitemize[1]
\item $\pi(x^{-1}) = \pi(x)^{-1}$ per a tot $x \in X$.
\item Per a tota paraula $w = w_1 \ldots w_r$ sobre $X \cup X^{-1}$,
\startformula
\pi(w) = \pi(w_1
Ah!, for startitemize[n] it works.
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
Sorry for perhaps silly question, but I receive and error for this code:
\subsubsubject{El problema de la paraula}
\startitemize[1]
\item $\pi(x^{-1}) = \pi(x)^{-1}$ per a tot $x \in X$.
\item Per a tota paraula $w = w_1 \ldots w_r
Hello,
There is no 0. before the first item:
\starttext
\startitemize[n][start=0]
\item bla
\item bla
\item bla
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact
Xan wrote:
Am 17.04.2009 um 16:33 schrieb Xan:
/ Hi,
//
// I want to do
//
// \startitemize[a][left={Apartado\space}]
// \head
// \stopitemize
//
// but put left={Apartado\space} _only_ for \head. How can I do that?
/
You could ask Hans Can you implement a 'headcommand' key in itemize
Hi,
I want to do
\startitemize[a][left={Apartado\space}]
\head
\stopitemize
but put left={Apartado\space} _only_ for \head. How can I do that?
Regards,
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
Xan wrote:
Hi,
I want to do
\startitemize[a][left={Apartado\space}]
\head
\stopitemize
but put left={Apartado\space} _only_ for \head. How can I do that?
best use the descriptions mechanism
Am 17.04.2009 um 16:33 schrieb Xan:
Hi,
I want to do
\startitemize[a][left={Apartado\space}]
\head
\stopitemize
but put left={Apartado\space} _only_ for \head. How can I do that?
You could ask Hans Can you implement a 'headcommand' key in itemize,
please.
Wolfgang
Am 17.04.2009 um 16:33 schrieb Xan:
/ Hi,
//
// I want to do
//
// \startitemize[a][left={Apartado\space}]
// \head
// \stopitemize
//
// but put left={Apartado\space} _only_ for \head. How can I do that?
/
You could ask Hans Can you implement a 'headcommand' key in itemize,
please
in
\startitemize[text] to be too large. Currently, this is hard coded to be
\emwidth plus \intertwordstretch minus \interwordshrink (line 1132 of
core-itm.tex with the comment new per 2006/10/20). I always end of
copying the definition of complexdoitemgroupitem to my private modules and
changing the emwidth
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hans, can this be included in the core?
later, i'd rather not touch code now while i'm in the middle some major
mkiv core code rework which will take a couple of weeks
so, fro the moment, just collect extension code
Hans
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hans,
I have always found the space at the beginning of each item in
\startitemize[text] to be too large. Currently, this is hard coded to be
\emwidth
Hi!
And again, I have a problem with itemizations. This won't work:
\startitemize
\item aaa
\item bbb
\startitemize[packed,joinedup]
\item xxx
\item yyy
\item zzz
\stopitemize
\item ccc
\stopitemize
More precisely, the joinedup option does not work in the inner
itemization
hi,
I am trying to migrate from latex to context and i would like to create an
enumeration using this minimal example :
\startitemize[m,joinedup]
\item\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item test 1
\item test 2
\item test 3
Hi Hans,
I have always found the space at the beginning of each item in
\startitemize[text] to be too large. Currently, this is hard coded to be
\emwidth plus \intertwordstretch minus \interwordshrink (line 1132 of
core-itm.tex with the comment new per 2006/10/20). I always end of
copying
hi there,
context, just as latex can nest \startitemize,
the context manual says max level 4.
by default context uses the symbols for these 4 levels
o level 1: bullet
-- level 2: dash
* level 3: asterisk
level 4: triangle
it is very easy to change these per the manual
On 10/7/07, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
context, just as latex can nest \startitemize,
the context manual says max level 4.
by default context uses the symbols for these 4 levels
o level 1: bullet
-- level 2: dash
* level 3: asterisk
level 4: triangle
hmm, on Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:02:34PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec said that
\setupitemize[1][n]
\setupitemize[2][a][left=(,right=),stopper=]
\setupitemize[3][i]
\setupitemize[4][1] % symbol nr. 1
ehm... thank you very much :}
-f
--
if you don't think women are explosive, just drop one!
} (or in html ol vs ul)
\begin{itemize} is basically \startitemize
how would i go about defining \startenumarate ?
i thought of something like this, but it's not working:
\startsetups enum
\setupitemize[1][n]
\setupitemize[2][a][left=(,right=),stopper=]
\setupitemize[3][i
in latex.
\begin{enumarate} vs \begin{itemize} (or in html ol vs ul)
\begin{itemize} is basically \startitemize
how would i go about defining \startenumarate ?
i thought of something like this, but it's not working:
\defineitemgroup [enum] [levels=6]
\setupitemgroup[enum][1][n
Hi Hans,
\startitemize[text] causes a par break at the end. From the code, it
looks like it should not. Here is an example
\starttext
Some garbage text
\startitemize[text,r]
\item This is a test
\item Which does not work
\stopitemize
the garbage continues
\stoptext
There is a par break
Dear Sirs.
I have a large buffer that include several items packed in a initial
startitemize environment. Using this list, I want build a several small
lists with five inital items in the random order.
I try to do in this way, but without success :-((
%
\startsetups
batela wrote:
Dear Sirs.
I have a large buffer that include several items packed in a initial
startitemize environment. Using this list, I want build a several small
lists with five inital items in the random order.
I try to do in this way, but without success
Radhelorn wrote:
I have another observation in
behaviour of 'repeat' option but will try to experiment with this a
little more. This itm module is too elaborate.
After Taco's t-itmfix I've came up with my own little fix. Please observe.
--
Radhelorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\def\dolistitem % evt
Radhelorn wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Radhelorn wrote:
1. item
1.1item
1.2.1 item
1.2.1.1.item
1.2.2.1em
for that you can best set up a dedicated instance of itemize
(defineitemgroup) and assign the right widths to the levels
I'm sorry to disturb you with my endless
Hans Hagen wrote:
\defineitemgroup[myitemize]
\setupitemgroup[myitemize][n,width=4em]
\setupitemgroup[myitemize][each][width=4em]
\setupitemgroup[myitemize][each][n]
Thanks. This will do for a time. Actually I have another observation in
behaviour of 'repeat' option but will try to
Hello All!
A while ago Hans introduced 'repeat' option for \startitemize to make
nested items. I've decided to give it a try:
\startitemize[repeat]
\item item1
\startitemize
\item item1.1
\item item1.2
\item item1.3
\stopitemize
\item
\startitemize
\item item2.1
\item item2.2
Radhelorn wrote:
Hello All!
A while ago Hans introduced 'repeat' option for \startitemize to make
nested items. I've decided to give it a try:
next time give it a try when i just made it; it took some time to figure
out what was wrong (rather tricky code)
\unprotect
\def
Hans Hagen wrote:
Radhelorn wrote:
Hello All!
A while ago Hans introduced 'repeat' option for \startitemize to make
nested items. I've decided to give it a try:
next time give it a try when i just made it; it took some time to figure
out what was wrong (rather tricky code)
Thanks
Radhelorn wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Radhelorn wrote:
Hello All!
A while ago Hans introduced 'repeat' option for \startitemize to
make nested items. I've decided to give it a try:
next time give it a try when i just made it; it took some time to
figure out what was wrong (rather tricky
Dear John,
There is no need to change anything, it is already there:
\starttext
\setupitemize[1][symbol=n]
\setupitemize[2][symbol=a]
\setupitemize[3][symbol=A]
\setupitemize[4][symbol=R]
\startitemize
\item One
\startitemize
\item Second level
\startitemize
\item
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I tried the following, but without success:
\starttext
begin
\startitemize[packed][beforehead=\blank,headstyle=bold]
You can't use packed and beforehead at the same time.
\startitemize[beforehead=\blank,afterhead=,headstyle=bold
Hello,
does somebody know how to get some space between two \head entries in the
ConTeXt-way?
I tried the following, but without success:
\starttext
begin
\startitemize[packed][beforehead=\blank,headstyle=bold]
\head head\par
line
\head head\par
line
\head head\par
line
\stopitemize
end
* Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jun 14, 2004 11:40]:
i posted a fix for that:
yeah, i updated page-mul.tex.
this should go into cont=new.tex
Aha! OK, sorry...now it works,
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull:: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA::
Willi Egger wrote:
ConTeXt ver: 2004.3.19 fmt: 2004.6.6
This is pdfeTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.11a-2.1 (Web2c 7.5.2)
(format=cont-en 2004.6.6) 12 JUN 2004 15:00
Hans, what is the meaning of the k behind PdfTeX?
experimental (has become an x)
Hans
___
it seems to
fix it from there on, though.
\starttext
\chapter{One}
\dorecurse{7}{\input zapf \par\relax}
\startitemize[columns,four]
\dorecurse{12}{\nop \type{[:alnum:]}}
\stopitemize
\dorecurse{7}{\input zapf \par\relax}
\stoptext
i posted a fix for that:
\def\endmulticolumns
{%\par
\vskip
of something that gets messed up. Text following the itemize
doesn't get paginated properly. Having a new chapter after it seems to
fix it from there on, though.
\starttext
\chapter{One}
\dorecurse{7}{\input zapf \par\relax}
\startitemize[columns,four]
\dorecurse{12}{\nop \type{[:alnum:]}}
\stopitemize
there on, though.
\starttext
\chapter{One}
\dorecurse{7}{\input zapf \par\relax}
\startitemize[columns,four]
\dorecurse{12}{\nop \type{[:alnum:]}}
\stopitemize
\dorecurse{7}{\input zapf \par\relax}
\stoptext
This fails for \startitemize[columns] as well. It seems that the problem
arises when
I'm having a problem with \startitemize. My code is
\startitemize[n,columns,four]
\item $ S \rightarrow ACaB$
\item $Ca \rightarrow aaC$
\item $CB \rightarrow DB$
\item $CB \rightarrow E$
\item $aD \rightarrow Da$
\item $AD \rightarrow AC$
\item $aE \rightarrow Ea$
\item $AE \rightarrow \epsilon
101 - 156 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
