En/na Peter Rolf ha escrit:
Xan schrieb:
Hi,
I want to start itemize with 2.
I put \startitemize[n][start=2] but it does not work.
third and hopefully last try :D
[strc-itm.mkii]
\def\setitemlevel#1%
{\ifnum\currentitemlevel\zerocount
\settrue\firstlistitem
%
% \expanded
x...@rulot:~$ textools --findfile strc-itm.mkii
TeXTools | locating file in texmf tree
TeXTools |
TeXTools | no file found
A clear sign that your ConTeXt isn't setup correctly. Are you using
the 'ConTeXt minimals'?
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals
I once followed the
Hi,
I want to start itemize with 2.
I put \startitemize[n][start=2] but it does not work.
Strange?
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg
Hi Xan,
looks like you have to separate the setup in this case.
\starttext
\setupitemize[start=2]
\startitemize[n]
\item foo
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Best wishes, Peter
Xan schrieb:
Hi,
I want to start itemize with 2.
I put \startitemize[n][start=2] but it does not work.
Strange?
Xan
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Xan,
looks like you have to separate the setup in this case.
\starttext
\setupitemize[start=2]
\startitemize[n]
\item foo
\stopitemize
\stoptext
\startitemize[n][start=2] works in mkiv.
Aditya
As per the wiki mailing lists, the following should give me a numbered list
with the numbers right aligned:
\startitemize[n,fit,packed]
[itemalign=flushright,distance=12pt,width=60pt]
\dorecurse{10}{\item blablabla}
\stopitemize
Unfortunately, with the fit setting, the width setting stops
Nevermind folks. I seem to have figured it out as per another mailing list.
Use broad:
\startitemize[n,packed,fit,broad]
[margin=6pt,itemalign=flushright,distance=24pt]
\dorecurse{10}{\item blablabla}
\stopitemize
Then distance controls the space after the number.
On Wednesday 12 August 2009
Hello,
The example shows the problem:
\usemodule[letter]
\starttext
\startletter
\startitemize
\item Lines are broken
at the same places as the input text.
Strange...
\stopitemize
\stopletter
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Peter Münster wrote:
\usemodule[letter]
\starttext
\startletter
\startitemize
\item Lines are broken
at the same places as the input text.
Strange...
\stopitemize
\stopletter
\stoptext
Excuse me, the problem has nothing to do with itemize. Here a smaller
Am 22.07.2009 um 11:43 schrieb Peter Münster:
Lines are broken
at the same places as the input text.
Strange...
fixed, was the side effect of a user request
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to
I've downloaded the beta today, which fails on one of my itemizes using the
KR
numbering scheme. I'm using MkIV context, with the following file:
fixed in next beta
Thanks!
Gr.
Matthijs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Hi,
I've downloaded the beta today, which fails on one of my itemizes using the KR
numbering scheme. I'm using MkIV context, with the following file:
\starttext
\startitemize[KR]
\item Foo
\stopitemize
\stoptext
fixed in next beta
Hi,
I've downloaded the beta today, which fails on one of my itemizes using the KR
numbering scheme. I'm using MkIV context, with the following file:
\starttext
\startitemize[KR]
\item Foo
\stopitemize
\stoptext
When compiling this file, I get the below errors. When using R instead of
or should use paragraphs internally rather
than
columns so as to work within a column(set).
that's a limitation in tex, when you use the 'columns' key for itemize
the items are typeset with a \startcolumns / \stopcolumns before and
after the environment and you can nest columns /columnset
internally rather
than
columns so as to work within a column(set).
that's a limitation in tex, when you use the 'columns' key for itemize
the items are typeset with a \startcolumns / \stopcolumns before and
after the environment and you can nest columns /columnset environments
(a tex limitation
to the following remark:
no, the current itemize columns work nicely in the main vertical liust
while simple columns are a box
future mkiv versions might have better mechamisms
Hans
-
Hans
Hello,
I just completed a big project making heavy use of columnset, columnsetspan
and paragraphs. Very powerful!
Two questions, first:
What is the real difference between columns and columnset?
I am a bit confused* about their coexistence. Is this purposeful or necessary
(or is it simply
Anybody can help. I don't understand this behaviour
1
2
1. should be 2.1
2.2
2.3
Thanks
Em 21/04/2009, às 6:09, Wolfgang Schuster escreveu:
Am 21.04.2009 um 18:31 schrieb batela:
Dear Sirs
I found this bug in ContextMinimals last version
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item first
Dears Sirs,
anybody can share a solution for this bug. I need to prepare a document
for tomorrow and it is very unpleasant include this kind of error.
thanks a lot.
Em 21/04/2009, às 6:09, Wolfgang Schuster escreveu:
Am 21.04.2009 um 18:31 schrieb batela:
Dear Sirs
I found this bug
Dear Sirs
I found this bug in ContextMinimals last version
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item first
\item second
\startitemize[m,repeat]
\item second.1, = should be 2.1, but only appears 1.
\item second.2
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Am 21.04.2009 um 18:31 schrieb batela:
Dear Sirs
I found this bug in ContextMinimals last version
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item first
\item second
\startitemize[m,repeat]
\item second.1, = should be 2.1, but only
appears 1.
\item second.2
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
Hello,
How can I get a symbol used in itemize, mode 2 (bold dash)?
Best,
Vaytcheslav
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http
On Mar 24, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
How can I get a symbol used in itemize, mode 2 (bold dash)?
Best,
Vaytcheslav
You want to read chapter 10.6 of the ConTeXt manual; your question is
answered on the second page of that chapter.
Thomas
I need a symbol that produces a dash like found in itemizations.
Standard '--' gives slightly different, light dash. From the Acrobat, I
know that the font is txsy.
In the page you specified, there is a trick how to produce diamond
(\diamond). But there is no \dash symbol defined.
You want
Am 24.03.2009 um 23:19 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
I need a symbol that produces a dash like found in itemizations.
Standard '--' gives slightly different, light dash. From the
Acrobat, I know that the font is txsy.
\symbol[dash] or $-$
In the page you specified, there is a trick how
Aditya Mahajan adityam at umich.edu writes:
\defineitemgroup[choices]
\startmode[random]
\setupitemgroup[choices][1][random]
\nextrandom % to get rid of the randomize bug
\stopmode
Compile this file with texexec --mode=random to get random choices,
compile without --mode=... to
than going
and taking out the random from each itemize environment?
Thanks.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http
Am 27.02.2009 um 22:22 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I've also noticed a strange thing: the first item always is the
first -
it won't get mixed with the others.
There is a bug somewhere in the initialization of the random number
generator. The first random number is always 1. An easy work
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 27.02.2009 um 22:22 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I've also noticed a strange thing: the first item always is the first -
it won't get mixed with the others.
There is a bug somewhere in the initialization of the random number
generator. The first random number is
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
i'd rather try to figure out why the initialization fails; i noticed it a
while ago, but couldn't find the reason
Don't know why this happens with the randomizer in thrd-ran.tex but
it's easy to solve it in supp-ran.tex
Line 72
Hello,
I've noticed that \startitemize[random] does not mix the items randomly.
Is it a bug or am I doing something wrong?
Here's the code (tested on context live):
\starttext
\startitemize[a,random]
\item A
\item B
\item C
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Regards
--
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Marcin Borkowski
mb...@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that \startitemize[random] does not mix the items randomly.
Is it a bug or am I doing something wrong?
A simple \item is not enough, you need a \startitem ... \stopitem pair.
Please add a
Dnia Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:25:39PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisa#322;(a):
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Marcin Borkowski
mb...@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that \startitemize[random] does not mix the items randomly.
Is it a bug or am I doing something wrong?
2009/2/27 Marcin Borkowski mb...@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl:
Thanks for a speedy response!
I've also noticed a strange thing: the first item always is the first -
it won't get mixed with the others.
This is normal although I have here a document [1] where the first item
always appear between the
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2009/2/27 Marcin Borkowski mb...@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl:
Thanks for a speedy response!
I've also noticed a strange thing: the first item always is the first -
it won't get mixed with the others.
This is normal although I have here a document [1]
permutation); is it possible to do that in a way other than going
and taking out the random from each itemize environment?
Thanks.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki
in the order I entered them in (i.e.,
not a random permutation); is it possible to do that in a way other than going
and taking out the random from each itemize environment?
Use modes:
\defineitemgroup[choices]
\startmode[random]
\setupitemgroup[choices][1][random]
\nextrandom % to get rid
I started making lists and sublists. In the first startitemize I use
an 8 in the setup, because I want squared bullets. For my sublists I
use 5, because I want to use circles there. Is there a way not to have
to put it everywhere? (When I change to a triangle, I do not want to
change it
Hi Cecil
\setupitemgroup
[itemize]
[1]
[symbol=8]
\setupitemgroup
[itemize]
[2]
[symbol=5]
KA en KR: looking at the table in the manual it would be that itemize
uses small caps.
Willi
On Jan 23, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
I
2009/1/23 Willi Egger w.eg...@boede.nl:
\setupitemgroup
[itemize]
[1]
[symbol=8]
\setupitemgroup
[itemize]
[2]
[symbol=5]
Works.
KA en KR: looking at the table in the manual it would be that itemize uses
small caps.
I think you are right
Derek CORDEIRO derekcordeiro at gmail.com writes:
Maybe \setupitemize[margin=1cm] will give the top level a 1cm indentation? I'm
not sure if thats what your looking out for.(I'm a novice too)
-- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Blog: http://www.derekcordeiro.comFollow Me:
Hello Folks,
Is there a way to have the first level of items indented. The second and
subsequent levels are indented by default, but how does one achieve indentation
of the first level. I looked at the options in the Context manual and I see that
the default value of indentnext is yes. However, I
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Curious curiousle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Folks,
Is there a way to have the first level of items indented. The second and
subsequent levels are indented by default, but how does one achieve
indentation
of the first level. I looked at the options in the
Hi,
do own of you know how I can have a line in the tabulate that will start
at the same position as the first column, \HR is no solution for me
because it adds extra space before the line and I try to avoid to define
my own costomized \HR command.
\starttext
\startitemize
\item text text text
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
do own of you know how I can have a line in the tabulate that will start
at the same position as the first column, \HR is no solution for me
because it adds extra space before the line and I try to avoid to
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
itemize won't work with page arrangement. Is this connected with this:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Caveat:_common_troubles ?
(In other words: feature, not bug; and resolvable using
texexec --arrange
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
itemize won't work with page arrangement. Is this connected with this:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Caveat:_common_troubles ?
(In other words: feature, not bug; and resolvable using
texexec --arrange?)
Quite likely - I must say that I didn't notice
Hi all,
itemize won't work with page arrangement. Is this connected with this:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Caveat:_common_troubles ?
(In other words: feature, not bug; and resolvable using
texexec --arrange?)
(I just want to be sure.)
Greets
--
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
itemize won't work with page arrangement. Is this connected with this:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Caveat:_common_troubles ?
(In other words: feature, not bug; and resolvable using
texexec --arrange?)
(I just want
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I am setting up a head which simply puts its contents in a layer, so that
I can control where to place the head. If the head is followed by an
itemize, I get spurious white space. See the following test
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I am setting up a head which simply puts its contents in a layer, so that
I can control where to place the head. If the head is followed by an
itemize, I get spurious white space. See the following test file. Page 1
is head followed by text, which is OK. Page 2
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I am setting up a head which simply puts its contents in a layer, so that
I can control where to place the head. If the head is followed by an
itemize, I get spurious white space. See the following test file. Page 1
is head
Hi,
I am setting up a head which simply puts its contents in a layer, so that
I can control where to place the head. If the head is followed by an
itemize, I get spurious white space. See the following test file. Page 1
is head followed by text, which is OK. Page 2 is head followed by itemize
Hi,
why doesn't this work?
\starttext
Hello world!
\startitemize[a,stopper=)]
\item $x'=f(t,x)$
\item $u_x=2x-y$
\stopitemize
\stoptext
On both my system (up-to-date texlive2008) and ConTeXt online I get
bullets. Without `stopper=)' thing it works.
Any help?
--
Marcin Borkowski
Am 02.10.2008 um 10:39 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Hi,
why doesn't this work?
\starttext
Hello world!
\startitemize[a,stopper=)]
\startitemize[a][stopper=)]
\item $x'=f(t,x)$
\item $u_x=2x-y$
\stopitemize
\stoptext
On both my system (up-to-date texlive2008) and ConTeXt online I get
Dnia Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 10:43:23AM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster napisa#322;(a):
Am 02.10.2008 um 10:39 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Hi,
why doesn't this work?
\starttext
Hello world!
\startitemize[a,stopper=)]
\startitemize[a][stopper=)]
Thanks, my mistake...
Greets
--
Marcin
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove space before (and after) items in the following
example, but the only way I have managed to do that was by using
\vskip-\lineheight, which I'm not particulary proud of. Any ideas?
\setupwhitespace
[big]
\setupitemize
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove space before (and after) items in the following
example, but the only way I have managed to do that was by using
\vskip-\lineheight, which I'm not particulary proud of. Any ideas?
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove space before (and after) items in the following
example, but the only way I have managed to do that was by using
\vskip-\lineheight, which I'm not particulary proud of.
]
\item oeps \item oeps
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
OK I need some fresh air. paragraph indeed works (I knew I saw
it working), but only in the inner level (starting with the second
one) of itemize.
The first (outer) level indeed needs to be tuned with nowhite -
paragraph
Hello,
I'm trying to remove space before (and after) items in the following
example, but the only way I have managed to do that was by using
\vskip-\lineheight, which I'm not particulary proud of. Any ideas?
\setupwhitespace
[big]
\setupitemize
[joinedup]
\setuplayout
Hi all,
I try to understand why this doesn't work as I expected?
\definestartstop
[bulletlist]
[before={\startitemize[packed]},
after={\stopitemize}]
\definestartstop
[bulletlistitem]
[before={\item},
after={ }]
\starttext
\startbulletlist{
Hi Jelle,
I am not sure how you would solve this using \definestartstop, but you
can define your own itemgroup:
\definestartstop
[bulletlistitem]
[before={\item},
after=]
\defineitemgroup[bulletlist]
\setupitemgroup[bulletlist][packed]
\starttext
\startbulletlist
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Jelle Huisman wrote:
Hi all,
I try to understand why this doesn't work as I expected?
\definestartstop
[bulletlist]
[before={\startitemize[packed]},
after={\stopitemize}]
\definestartstop
[bulletlistitem]
[before={\item},
after={ }]
(Untested)
Thank you Patrick and Aditya,
I think I'll use \defineitemgroup etc., but I'm still curios what the
difference is between these two:
\startbulletlist \startbulletlistitem{One}\stopbulletlistitem
\stopbulletlist % this works
\startbulletlist{ \startbulletlistitem{One}\stopbulletlistitem
{ \startbulletlistitem{One}\stopbulletlistitem
}\stopbulletlist % this breaks
I do not know why the extra grouping messes up itemize
(I would prefer to use the second version with { }...)
Sure you can
\def\startbulletlist#1%
{\startitemize[packed]
#1
\stopitemize}
\def
\stopbulletlist % this works
\startbulletlist{ \startbulletlistitem{One}\stopbulletlistitem
}\stopbulletlist % this breaks
I do not know why the extra grouping messes up itemize
(I would prefer to use the second version with { }...)
Sure you can
\def\startbulletlist#1%
{\startitemize[packed
Hi,
I want to use subitems without entries in the first level
(only the number should be incremented).
\unprotect
\def\newdolistitem % reduced \dolistitem
{\increment\noflistelements
\setbox8\hbox
{\doitemattributes\currentitemlevel\c!style\c!color{\listitem}}%
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi,
I want to use subitems without entries in the first level
(only the number should be incremented).
ok, added but slightly different implementation
-
Hans
Hello,
running the file
%%%
\starttext
\startitemize[3]
\item Hello world!
\stopitemize
\stoptext
%%%
in luatex, I did expect to get a star and then Hello world! However, I
got something like \perp instead of the star.
It works with pdftex. I also tried with some other fonts with same
failing
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
Hello,
running the file
%%%
\starttext
\startitemize[3]
\item Hello world!
\stopitemize
\stoptext
%%%
in luatex, I did expect to get a star and then Hello world! However, I
got something like \perp instead of the star.
It works with
Thank you very much Aditya!
Best regards, Mikael
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Mikael Persson wrote:
Hello,
running the file
%%%
\starttext
\startitemize[3]
\item Hello world!
\stopitemize
\stoptext
%%%
in luatex, I
Mikael Persson wrote:
Hello,
running the file
%%%
\starttext
\startitemize[3]
\item Hello world!
\stopitemize
\stoptext
%%%
in luatex, I did expect to get a star and then Hello world! However, I
got something like \perp instead of the star.
It works with pdftex. I also tried
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Any solutions around?
Hans, can you correct this in the core.
sure, done already
(somehow your mail ends up ou tof order in my mailbox related to the
question, some time issue?)
-
And 9? Best
\starttext
\def\mypaddednumber#1{\ifnum#110 0\fi\number#1\relax}
\defineconversion[pn] [\mypaddednumber]
\startitemize[pn,broad]
\item oeps
\item oeps
\item oeps
\stopitemize
\stoptext
___
If your
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Carlos Breton Besnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And 9? Best
What do you mean, I didn't understand your questions.
Wolfgang
\starttext
\def\mypaddednumber#1{\ifnum#110 0\fi\number#1\relax}
\defineconversion[pn] [\mypaddednumber]
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
If yes, how? And if no, where is the magic point, where I could apply a
patch (if it's not too difficult ;)
has always been possible ...
\starttext
2008/6/8, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
Is it already possible to get 0 padding with \startitemize:
01
02
03
and so on ?
If yes, how? And if no, where is the magic point, where I could apply a
patch (if it's not too difficult ;)
has always been
On Sun, Jun 08 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
If yes, how? And if no, where is the magic point, where I could apply a
patch (if it's not too difficult ;)
has always been possible ...
\starttext
\def\mypaddednumber#1{\ifnum#19 0\fi\number#1\relax}
\defineconversion[pn] [\mypaddednumber]
Hello,
Is it already possible to get 0 padding with \startitemize:
01
02
03
and so on ?
If yes, how? And if no, where is the magic point, where I could apply a
patch (if it's not too difficult ;)
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
Is it already possible to get 0 padding with \startitemize:
01
02
03
and so on ?
If yes, how? And if no, where is the magic point, where I could apply a
patch (if it's not too difficult ;)
has always been possible ...
\starttext
The following minimal example goes wrong:
\starttext
\startitemize[a]
\item sub a
\startitemize
\item sub a1
\item sub a2
\stopitemize
\item sub b
\stopitemize
\stoptext
The result is:
. sub a
- sub a1
- sub a2
a. sub b
Whereas:
\starttext
\startitemize[a]
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following minimal example goes wrong:
\starttext
\startitemize[a]
\item sub a
\startitemize
\item sub a1
\item sub a2
\stopitemize
\item sub b
\stopitemize
\stoptext
The result
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put this in my source file:
\startitemize[R][4*broad,stopper=---]
\startitemize[R,4*broad][stopper=---]
And in the output the m rule (---) was
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put this in my source file:
\startitemize[R][4*broad,stopper=---]
\startitemize[R,4*broad][stopper=---]
And in the output the m rule (---) was overlapped by the roman
numeral. By the way I would like to align the roman
I have put this in my source file:
\startitemize[R][4*broad,stopper=---]
And in the output the m rule (---) was overlapped by the roman
numeral. By the way I would like to align the roman numeral to the
right more or less like this (it is difficult to do in text format)
I ---
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
and the first itemize starts at 0. Remove the inner itemize and it
starts
at 1.
Is this a feature or a bug? How do I get around it?
Here is a modified core-itm.tex that corrects this bug.
Aditya
Am 2008-04-29 um 17:49 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I just tried the following on Context Live:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\startitemize
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
and the first itemize starts at 0. Remove
and the first itemize starts at 0. Remove the inner itemize and
it starts
at 1.
Is this a feature or a bug? How do I get around it?
I can confirm that here. This is indeed a bug.
I reported some weeks ago that numbering starts always at 0 with --once
I guess Hans Co went after
Hello All,
I just tried the following on Context Live:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\startitemize
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
and the first itemize starts at 0. Remove the inner itemize and it starts
at 1
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I just tried the following on Context Live:
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\startitemize
\item a
\item b
\stopitemize
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
and the first itemize starts at 0
Hi all,
When using \head within a itemize environment, with
\setupitemize[headstyle=bold]
in the preamble, I get a big bold point at the beginning of each line of
itemization; how can I get rid of it?
tia,
--
Jean
Hi everyone,
I am wondering about the effects of the 'margin=yes' option in itemize
environments. It seems to be incompatible with the 'packed' option.
In the following example, the third itemize doesn't get packed, even if
the 'packed' option is present. Is it a feature? In this case, how can
Hi Morgan,
I am wondering about the effects of the 'margin=yes' option in itemize
environments. It seems to be incompatible with the 'packed' option.
you can't use assignments and commands in the same argument.
In the following example, the third itemize doesn't get packed, even
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Morgan,
I am wondering about the effects of the 'margin=yes' option in itemize
environments. It seems to be incompatible with the 'packed' option.
you can't use assignments and commands in the same argument.
D'oh! Now I feel terribly sorry
I've searched the documentation and emails, but I didn't find the
answer... It sounds really simple:
How can I make the numbers in startitemize[n,...] start from 0 instead of 1?
Thanks,
Zeus.
___
If your question is
2007/12/3, Zeus Gómez Marmolejo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've searched the documentation and emails, but I didn't find the
answer... It sounds really simple:
How can I make the numbers in startitemize[n,...] start from 0 instead of 1?
Thanks,
Zeus.
Hi,
\startitemize has a start value, but it is
Hans van der Meer wrote:
It is my intention to place a list inside an itemize, and therefore
prepend a \item before every list item. Thus:
\startitemize
\placelist[Topic][label=no,pagenumber=no,before=\item]}%
\stopitemize
However this doesn't work but instead gives
It is my intention to place a list inside an itemize, and therefore
prepend a \item before every list item. Thus:
\startitemize
\placelist[Topic][label=no,pagenumber=no,before=\item]}%
\stopitemize
However this doesn't work but instead gives the following error
2007/11/5, Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is my intention to place a list inside an itemize, and therefore
prepend a \item before every list item. Thus:
\startitemize
\placelist[Topic][label=no,pagenumber=no,before=\item]}%
\stopitemize
However this doesn't work but instead gives
601 - 700 of 852 matches
Mail list logo
