On 05/07/2011 05:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:08, Marco wrote:
On 2011-05-06 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Looks like context needs a package manager.
[...] but I admit that I miss some GUI (but then again I
have no idea how to write a portable GUI).
There are several
On 2011-05-07 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:08, Marco wrote:
On 2011-05-06 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Looks like context needs a package manager.
[...] but I admit that I miss some GUI (but then
again I have no idea how to write a
On 2011-05-08 Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
There are several possibilities, GTK+ is well
documented, ported to many platforms and operating
systems (However, maybe not to all, ConTeXt supports)
and has Lua bindings.
If you can prepare a very simple example and
Another option could be to use a http browser, using Hans' mtxrun web
server and client? That is pure lua, but of course it is not available
until after installation of context.
We could bootstrap the system by first downloading only the necessary
pieces, like is done for the Minimals. It
On 8-5-2011 4:56, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Another option could be to use a http browser, using Hans' mtxrun web
server and client? That is pure lua, but of course it is not available
until after installation of context.
We could bootstrap the system by first downloading only the necessary
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 19:36, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 8-5-2011 4:56, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Another option could be to use a http browser, using Hans' mtxrun web
server and client? That is pure lua, but of course it is not available
until after installation of context.
We
On 2011-05-07 17:45:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:19, Philipp Gesang wrote:
2. Until we do something about it, it would be very very desirable to
put it to modules.contextgarden.net (I know that it is painful).
If it’s possible now I’d try it asap.
Did you
On Sun 08 May 2011, Marco wrote:
If we prefer TK over GTK why not use the lua Tk bindings?
When I saw this discussion starting I googled the Lua Tk bindings, and
it turned out [1] that they apparently haven't been updated since
1998. A shame, since Tk is usually a good bet for easy
On 2011-05-08 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 19:36, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
wrote:
On 8-5-2011 4:56, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Another option could be to use a http browser, using
Hans' mtxrun web server and client? That is pure
lua,
On May 8, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Marco wrote:
Having a GUI installer for the minimals (to make it more
user-friendly and enable the user to choose what modules
and fonts to install).
Just a (maybe stupid) idea:
What about making the existing windows GUI install and/or
update all
On 2011-05-08 Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de wrote:
On May 8, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Marco wrote:
Having a GUI installer for the minimals (to make it more
user-friendly and enable the user to choose what modules
and fonts to install).
Just a (maybe stupid) idea:
Hi Mojca all,
On 2011-05-06 20:55:59, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 19:00, Philipp Gesang wrote:
1b. At least somebody needs to find it useful and request it (which
you just did; should it also be added to TeX Live?).
What would the inclusion into TL imply?
That
Am 07.05.2011 um 12:19 schrieb Philipp Gesang:
Hi Mojca all,
What would the inclusion into TL imply?
That people using TeX Live could also install it.
True, but I was, rather selfishly, thinking about what it would
imply for the module author. Permanent maintenance of one release
On 2011-05-07 13:23:18, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 07.05.2011 um 12:19 schrieb Philipp Gesang:
Hi Mojca all,
What would the inclusion into TL imply?
That people using TeX Live could also install it.
True, but I was, rather selfishly, thinking about what it would
imply for
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:08, Marco wrote:
On 2011-05-06 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Looks like context needs a package manager.
[...] but I admit that I miss some GUI (but then again I
have no idea how to write a portable GUI).
There are several possibilities, GTK+ is well documented,
ported
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:19, Philipp Gesang wrote:
What would the inclusion into TL imply?
That people using TeX Live could also install it.
True, but I was, rather selfishly, thinking about what it would
imply for the module author. Permanent maintenance of one release
over a year? Is
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 19:00, Philipp Gesang wrote:
1b. At least somebody needs to find it useful and request it (which
you just did; should it also be added to TeX Live?).
What would the inclusion into TL imply?
That people using TeX Live could also install it.
2. Until we do something
Looks like context needs a package manager.
Do you have any suggestion how it should look like and how it should
work? mtx-update is kind-of package manager, but I admit that I miss
some GUI (but then again I have no idea how to write a portable GUI).
Similar to ruby gems or perl cpan or even
On 2011-05-06 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like context needs a package manager.
[...] but I admit that I miss some GUI (but then again I
have no idea how to write a portable GUI).
There are several possibilities, GTK+ is well documented,
ported to many
On 2011-05-04 18:02:44, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Philipp Gesang wrote:
Looks like context needs a package manager. (Something like
Arch’s PKGBUILDs, stored on the garden, could simplify the
minimals’ installation procedure a great deal.)
Hi Paul, Mojca others,
sorry for the late answer, I was cut off from the list for a
couple of days.
On 2011-05-01 13:18:05, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:18, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Philipp and ConTeXt folks,
what needs to be done, that the module t-rst [1] can be
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Philipp Gesang wrote:
Looks like context needs a package manager. (Something like
Arch’s PKGBUILDs, stored on the garden, could simplify the
minimals’ installation procedure a great deal.)
https://github.com/adityam/context-pkgbuild
(but this only installs the modules
Dear Philipp and ConTeXt folks,
what needs to be done, that the module t-rst [1] can be installed using
the following command.
$ ./first-setup.sh --extras=t-rst
(I. e. how can this module be included into the ConTeXt Minimals
distribution?)
Thanks,
Paul
[1]
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:18, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Philipp and ConTeXt folks,
what needs to be done, that the module t-rst [1] can be installed using
the following command.
$ ./first-setup.sh --extras=t-rst
1a. Somebody needs to check/confirmed that it is well-formed.
1b. At least
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com writes:
2. Until we do something about it, it would be very very desirable to
put it to modules.contextgarden.net (I know that it is painful).
Indeed, very painful ... ;)
I'm sure, that the module authors would like to run just one simple
command
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 14:33, Peter Münster wrote:
Suggestion: to make it easy and fast, why not just add a new
svn directory to foudry.supelec.fr, and every author gets a
sub-directory, where they can upload their modules in TDS format. And
the first-setup.sh would just pull the modules from
On Sun, 1 May 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
1a. Somebody needs to check/confirmed that it is well-formed.
To clarify, by well-formed you mean that it follows TDS; not the quality
of the module, right?
Aditya
___
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 16:14, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2011, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
1a. Somebody needs to check/confirmed that it is well-formed.
To clarify, by well-formed you mean that it follows TDS; not the quality of
the module, right?
Preferrably both. However TDS and some
28 matches
Mail list logo
