Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com writes:
Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and every
one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that documentation
is not their highest priority. There's the wiki, the wonderfully active
Can someone post a link to the actual reference manual rewrite Taco
was talking about? I don't see anything on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation that looks like
a reference manual in progress.
Mike
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:00 PM, David Wooten d...@trichotomic.net wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Michael Bynum wrote:
Can someone post a link to the actual reference manual rewrite Taco
was talking about? I don't see anything on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation that looks like
a reference manual in progress.
The links are after the big note
There is also,
but is still a work-in-progress
http://groups.foundry.supelec.fr/modules/
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl
Aditya Mahajan adityam at umich.edu writes:
Can someone post a link to the actual reference manual rewrite Taco
was talking about? I don't see anything on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation that looks like
a reference manual in progress.
The links are after the big
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Curious Learn wrote:
Aditya Mahajan adityam at umich.edu writes:
Can someone post a link to the actual reference manual rewrite Taco
was talking about? I don't see anything on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation that looks like
a reference manual in
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and every
one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that documentation
is not their highest priority. There's the wiki, the wonderfully active
mailing list, and what used
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Rory Molinari wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and
every
one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that
documentation
is not their highest priority. There's the
Wei-Wei Guo wrote:
Hi everyone,
After fighting with ConTeXt one month, I find it's too difficult. I have
two years
experience of LaTeX. I never thought ConTeXt could be so difficult.
Using ConTeXt
is like climbing a steep mountain, every step need extensive searching,
reading, and asking.
Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
Many have voiced the same complaint. I understand that Hans and every
one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that documentation
is not their highest priority. There's the wiki, the wonderfully active
mailing list, and what used to be decent docs
En/na Corin Royal Drummond ha escrit:
Wei-Wei Guo wrote:
Hi everyone,
After fighting with ConTeXt one month, I find it's too difficult. I
have two years
experience of LaTeX. I never thought ConTeXt could be so difficult.
Using ConTeXt
is like climbing a steep mountain, every step need
Xan wrote:
En/na Corin Royal Drummond ha escrit:
Wei-Wei Guo wrote:
Hi everyone,
After fighting with ConTeXt one month, I find it's too difficult. I
have two years
experience of LaTeX. I never thought ConTeXt could be so difficult.
Using ConTeXt
is like climbing a steep mountain, every
En/na Taco Hoekwater ha escrit:
Xan wrote:
Good idea.
Just a suggestion. If someone starts new documentation, it should be
free. Now the only documentation for users is ConTeXt manual,
Context, an excursion (and some PracTeX journal and MAPS journal
articles). These documents are copyrated
Xan wrote:
But should it put in every .tex file or in a LICENSE file? I'm not
lawyer. Just a question.
There is a COPYING in the one 'up' directory. It would be good to
add a license pointer to every source file, that is true.
Best wishes,
Taco
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Wei-Wei Guo wwgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi Wei-Wei,
Please enjoy what's underneath and give yourself a second chance to
reconsider your point of view...
After fighting with ConTeXt one month,
Those who live are those who fight.
- Victor Hugo
I
Yes, there are may fruitful pages in ConTeXt wiki. But all wiki resources have
the same problem: If you know what you are looking for, it's helpful. If not,
it would be a time hole. And I was told that MkIV progresses so fast that many
things in the current manuals are out of date. I don't know
Hi everyone,
After fighting with ConTeXt one month, I find it's too difficult. I have two
years
experience of LaTeX. I never thought ConTeXt could be so difficult. Using
ConTeXt
is like climbing a steep mountain, every step need extensive searching, reading,
and asking.
Sorry for the useless
Wei-Wei Guo wrote:
Hi everyone,
After fighting with ConTeXt one month, I find it's too difficult. I
have two years
experience of LaTeX. I never thought ConTeXt could be so difficult.
Using ConTeXt
is like climbing a steep mountain, every step need extensive
searching, reading,
and asking.
18 matches
Mail list logo
