On 12/3/2013 4:40 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/3/2013 3:10 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
...
Thanks again for your work on this.
We're continually reevaluating whether we can use the beta or need to
stick with the stable version. At the moment, it looks like we'll be
sticking with the stable
On 11/28/2013 1:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
That macro was never meant for mixed columns. I made a variant that
works ok in mixed columns which will be in the next beta.
\setuptolerance[verytolerant]
\starttext
\startmixedcolumns
\dorecurse{4}{\input ward \par}
On 12/3/2013 3:10 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/28/2013 1:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
That macro was never meant for mixed columns. I made a variant that
works ok in mixed columns which will be in the next beta.
\setuptolerance[verytolerant]
\starttext
\startmixedcolumns
On 11/28/2013 1:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
That macro was never meant for mixed columns. I made a variant that
works ok in mixed columns which will be in the next beta.
Excellent. I will give it a try.
I see a context-setup-win64 dated 2013-11-28 19:45. Is that beta? I may
wait for the next one
On 11/29/2013 12:26 PM, Lars Huttar (SIL gmail) wrote:
On 11/28/2013 1:34 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
That macro was never meant for mixed columns. I made a variant that
works ok in mixed columns which will be in the next beta.
Excellent. I will give it a try.
I see a context-setup-win64 dated
On 11/20/2013 10:47 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
Hello,
On this list I've been advised that mixedcolumns is the latest and
greatest implementation of columns; the one to use. We have switched
over from columnsets to mixedcolumns, and have been very pleased with
the column balancing (for some reason
On 11/23/2013 6:49 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/22/2013 11:37 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/22/2013 4:59 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/20/2013 11:12 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/20/2013 4:47 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
However one thing we do miss from columnsets is the control over
widows
orphans
On 11/22/2013 11:37 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/22/2013 4:59 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/20/2013 11:12 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/20/2013 4:47 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
However one thing we do miss from columnsets is the control over widows
orphans in two ways: \testcolumn, and
On 11/20/2013 11:12 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/20/2013 4:47 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
However one thing we do miss from columnsets is the control over widows
orphans in two ways: \testcolumn, and \setupcolumnsetlines.
\testcolumn[n] allowed us to do a conditional column break, so when we
were
On 11/22/2013 4:59 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/20/2013 11:12 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
On 11/20/2013 4:47 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
However one thing we do miss from columnsets is the control over widows
orphans in two ways: \testcolumn, and \setupcolumnsetlines.
\testcolumn[n] allowed us to do a
Hello,
On this list I've been advised that mixedcolumns is the latest and
greatest implementation of columns; the one to use. We have switched
over from columnsets to mixedcolumns, and have been very pleased with
the column balancing (for some reason we couldn't get column balancing
to work in
On 11/20/2013 4:47 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
However one thing we do miss from columnsets is the control over widows
orphans in two ways: \testcolumn, and \setupcolumnsetlines.
\testcolumn[n] allowed us to do a conditional column break, so when we
were about to start a new subsection heading, we
12 matches
Mail list logo
