Re: [NTG-context] Referencing fonts by path within ConTeXt

Joey McCollum via ntg-context schrieb am 07.08.2021 um 22:29: Hi, I'm interested in packaging a ConTeXt project in a self-contained way, so that the environment/component/project .tex files, the bibliography .bib file(s), and fonts used for typesetting are all provided in one place. (The

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing fonts by path within ConTeXt

> Am 07.08.2021 um 22:29 schrieb Joey McCollum via ntg-context > : > > Hi, > > I'm interested in packaging a ConTeXt project in a self-contained way, so > that the environment/component/project .tex files, the bibliography .bib > file(s), and fonts used for typesetting are all provided in

[NTG-context] Referencing fonts by path within ConTeXt

Hi, I'm interested in packaging a ConTeXt project in a self-contained way, so that the environment/component/project .tex files, the bibliography .bib file(s), and fonts used for typesetting are all provided in one place. (The goal is that others can generate the PDFs themselves from the source

Re: [NTG-context] referencing both real and user pagenumbers

Alan Bowen schrieb am 29.05.2020 um 16:53: Thank you, Wolfgang. That works nicely. One small detail left: the reference is not interactive. I have tried \setupreferencing [state=start, interaction=all] but that does not seem to be the way. minimal file: \setupinteraction[state=start]

Re: [NTG-context] referencing both real and user pagenumbers

Alan Bowen schrieb am 29.05.2020 um 00:13: I have a collection of papers printed previously that are to go into a single volume so that, while the papers retain their original pagination and internal cross-referencing, they are also paginated continuously. I have managed to do this using

[NTG-context] referencing both real and user pagenumbers

I have a collection of papers printed previously that are to go into a single volume so that, while the papers retain their original pagination and internal cross-referencing, they are also paginated continuously. I have managed to do this using userpagenumbers for the individual papers and

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing formulas doesn't work?

Please allow me to ask in this thread something slightly off-topic: why doesn't ConTeXt give a compilation error or alike when encountering such kind of mistakes? Is it technically difficult, or is it conventional for *TeX processors to be over tolerant? On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:05 PM Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing formulas doesn't work?

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 05:58:50 +0800 Jon Wong wrote: > MWE: > > \starttext > > The famous result (and again) is given by > \placeformula[formulalabel] > \startformula > c^2 = a^2 + b^2. > \stopformula > And now we can refer to formula \ref[][formulalabel]. > > \stoptext > > There is a blank

[NTG-context] Referencing formulas doesn't work?

MWE: \starttext The famous result (and again) is given by \placeformula[formulalabel] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2. \stopformula And now we can refer to formula \ref[][formulalabel]. \stoptext There is a blank where the formula label should be at “now we can refer to formula ---“. Regards

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing equation, missing dot

On 11/13/2019 9:20 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, The following example used to work. But with an LMTX updated today, the numbering \eqref produces is (11) instead of the expected (1.1). The numbering in the equation itself is fine. Did something change on purpose? /Mikael %%% TEST

[NTG-context] Referencing equation, missing dot

Hi, The following example used to work. But with an LMTX updated today, the numbering \eqref produces is (11) instead of the expected (1.1). The numbering in the equation itself is fine. Did something change on purpose? /Mikael %%% TEST FILE \definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)]

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing the page on which an endnote was generated

Hi, you can always set *\pagereference[bla] *into the text and reference to the pagenumber of the reference with *\at[bla]*. Is that what you wanted? Huseyin Özoguz -- Huseyin Özoguz E-Mail: h.oezo...@mmnetz.de

[NTG-context] Referencing the page on which an endnote was generated

List, I would like to create headings for the endnotes appendix chapter of a book with headings like "Notes for pages x–y" but can find no way to capture x and y. Is there a way to get those page numbers to insert into the header? -- Rik

[NTG-context] referencing is broken in version: 2018.08.15 18:45

With this example code from the wiki (slightly modified for use here): \setuppapersize[A5] \starttext \placeformula[eq:pythagoras] \startformula   a^2+b^2=c^2 \stopformula This is explained in \in{Equation}{.}[eq:pythagoras] \stoptext The following output is obtained:

Re: [NTG-context] referencing a footnote (and getting the right number)

On 08/12/2018 10:10 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: > [...] > What does disturb me, however, is that I have this one chapter where > the wrong note number is indicated (note 19 is referred to as note > '18'), and I do not know why. Could it be that this is because earlier > in the chapter I have also

Re: [NTG-context] referencing a footnote (and getting the right number)

> On 12. Aug 2018, at 17:38, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > the reference command in notes is \in (for both MkII and MkIV), such as in: > >\starttext >\dorecurse{30}{\footnote{Footnote}} >\footnote[uvu-avu]{These two suffixes […]} >

Re: [NTG-context] referencing a footnote

> On 12. Aug 2018, at 17:52, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > > Sorry, Robert, I almost forgot it. > > If you reset the footnote numbers in each chapter, I’d rather suggest > something similar to: > > \footnote{See n.~\in[uvu-avu] on p.~\at[uvu-avu].} > > Since footnote numbers aren’t unique,

Re: [NTG-context] referencing a footnote

On 08/12/2018 05:38 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> On 08/12/2018 04:34 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: >> [..] >> … >> \footnote[uvu-avu]{These two suffixes […]} >> … >> \footnote{See n.~\note[uvu-avu].} >> … > > Hi Robert, > > the reference command in notes is \in (for both MkII and MkIV), such > as

Re: [NTG-context] referencing a footnote

On 08/12/2018 04:34 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: > Another footnote question for the experts. I want to refer to a note > from within another, later note. I thought I could do this in > the following way: > > … > \footnote[uvu-avu]{These two suffixes […]} > … > \footnote{See n.~\note[uvu-avu].} > …

[NTG-context] referencing a footnote

Another footnote question for the experts. I want to refer to a note from within another, later note. I thought I could do this in the following way: … \footnote[uvu-avu]{These two suffixes […] … \footnote{See n.~\note[uvu-avu].} … But I get this result: There are two things wrong: (1) I

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation

I usually define my own reference formats, “ineq” for equations, “infig” for figures: \definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=)] \definereferenceformat[infig][left=\labeltext{figure}] \starttext \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation

Dear Wolfgang, Although there is an answer in the manual, I didn’t read it carefully. Sometimes, I used “\in{word}[reference]” like “\in{equation}[eq:1]". But I have to change it to “equation (\in[eq:1])”. Thank you so much. Best regards, Dalyoung > 2018. 8. 10. 오전 12:21, Wolfgang Schuster

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the equation

When you look at the first example in section 4.1 you can see that the parentheses are inserted by hand. %% \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2] \stopalign \stopformula As seen from (\in[eq:1])

[NTG-context] referencing the equation

Dear, The examples in mathalign.pdf(p4 - ) tells us the method of referencing the equation. The numbers for the equation is written as (1.1), and in the text, it is written as (1.1). That is the numbers are always surrounded by ( , ). In the output of the following code, the equations are

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing footnotes by SECTION

On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 07:21:19 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد 2. Juli 2018 um 14:34 Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:58:44 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Idris, you can enable the display of chapter numbers

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing footnotes by SECTION

Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد 2. Juli 2018 um 14:34 Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:58:44 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Idris, you can enable the display of chapter numbers with the prefix-key: \setupnotation [footnote]

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing footnotes by SECTION

Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:58:44 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Idris, you can enable the display of chapter numbers with the prefix-key: \setupnotation [footnote] [prefix=yes, %prefixsegments=chapter, way=bychapter] Many thanks for this. There is an unwanted

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing footnotes by SECTION

Hi Idris, you can enable the display of chapter numbers with the prefix-key: \setupnotation [footnote] [prefix=yes, %prefixsegments=chapter, way=bychapter] Wolfgang Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد 30. Juni 2018 um 23:04 Dear gang, When

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing footnotes by SECTION

Attached! On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 15:04:02 -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote: Dear gang, When referencing footnotes that reset each chapter, is there a way to include the chapter information? See attached and below: === \setuphead[chapter]

[NTG-context] Referencing footnotes by SECTION

Dear gang, When referencing footnotes that reset each chapter, is there a way to include the chapter information? See attached and below: === \setuphead[chapter] [alternative=normal,conversion=R] \setuphead[subsection][alternative=text] \setuphead[subsection][distance=0em,

Re: [NTG-context] referencing and stoppers

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:20:57 -0600, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: You can use the \setupreferencestructureprefix command set a different value for the stopper but you have to ensure the key takes a value because a empty argument is ignored. Instead of the argument I used in my example

Re: [NTG-context] referencing and stoppers

You can use the \setupreferencestructureprefix command set a different value for the stopper but you have to ensure the key takes a value because a empty argument is ignored. Instead of the argument I used in my example (\symbol[none]) you can also use a unicode character without width, e.g.

[NTG-context] referencing and stoppers

Dear gang, For, e.g., \setuphead[...][alternative=text], one often wants the stopper to appear in the main text sectioning but not in the references to those sections. For example (attached and below): === \setuphead[chapter] [alternative=normal]

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the customized enumeration with framed title

On 1/12/2018 5:22 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: Dear Hans, Thank you for the quick answer. Repalcing “p:=textext.rt();” and commenting out “headcommand=gobbleone…” with your suggestion, the references are working. However, there is a side effect. “Theorem 1.1” appears twice, one in the frame which I

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the customized enumeration with framed title

Dear Hans, Thank you for the quick answer. Repalcing “p:=textext.rt();” and commenting out “headcommand=gobbleone…” with your suggestion, the references are working. However, there is a side effect. “Theorem 1.1” appears twice, one in the frame which I expected and one at the beginning of the

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the customized enumeration with framed title

On 1/12/2018 3:54 AM, Jeong Dal wrote: Hi, Some time ago, I am able to use following code(the framed title for Theorems and etc.) Thank Wolfgang and Otared again. Since it uses the customized style of numbering, there is a problem to reference them. As in the following code,

Re: [NTG-context] referencing the customized enumeration with framed title

On 1/12/2018 3:54 AM, Jeong Dal wrote: Hi, Some time ago, I am able to use following code(the framed title for Theorems and etc.) Thank Wolfgang and Otared again. Since it uses the customized style of numbering, there is a problem to reference them. As in the following code,

[NTG-context] referencing the customized enumeration with framed title

Hi, Some time ago, I am able to use following code(the framed title for Theorems and etc.) Thank Wolfgang and Otared again. Since it uses the customized style of numbering, there is a problem to reference them. As in the following code, \in{Definition}[] shows no number and \in{Theorem}[]

[NTG-context] Referencing existing endnotes

Suppose, in a footnote, I want to reference an existing endnote. text text text text.\endnote{Bladibladibla ends up at end of document, numbered in an appendix} Text text text text Text text\footnote{Foo bar bar bar\referencetoexistingendnotedefinedabove} text text Can I do that in some way?

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing existing endnotes

Am 13.09.2014 um 14:49 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl: Suppose, in a footnote, I want to reference an existing endnote. text text text text.\endnote{Bladibladibla ends up at end of document, numbered in an appendix} Text text text text Text text\footnote{Foo bar bar

[NTG-context] Referencing problem

Hi all, To include in a text several graphics that for some reason must have the same figure number (with suffixes .a, .b etc.), I use \\startplacefigure[location=here,reference=,title={},group=,groupsuffix=] {\externalfigure[]} \stopplacefigure an experimental solution that Hans gave me in

[NTG-context] Referencing problem (correction)

Sorry for the mistake: I wrote one \ too many so that I unwittingly created an absurd link. The message was supposed to be this: Hi all, To include in a text several graphics that for some reason must have the same figure number (with suffixes .a, .b etc.), I use

[NTG-context] Referencing a figure

I have written a macro to include figures. I pass the label name and the caption as the two arguments. But when I try to refer to the figure, it shows ??. Surely, my macro does not define the figure label as intended by me. What am I doing wrong? Also, while trying to debug this problem, I tried

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a figure

Hi! ···date: 2013-01-22, Tuesday···from: Devendra Ghate··· I have written a macro to include figures. I pass the label name and the caption as the two arguments. But when I try to refer to the figure, it shows ??. Surely, my macro does not define the figure label as intended by me. What

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a figure

On 01/22/2013 03:48 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote: Hi! ···date: 2013-01-22, Tuesday···from: Devendra Ghate··· I have written a macro to include figures. I pass the label name and the caption as the two arguments. But when I try to refer to the figure, it shows ??. Surely, my macro does not

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a Document within the same Project

On 21-3-2012 05:57, Malte Stien wrote: Hi all, I am designing a document suite consisting of two dozen or so documents that are all interrelated. I was wondering whether there is a way that I can define a reference point for an entire document within a project and then refer to that from

[NTG-context] Referencing a Document within the same Project

Hi all, I am designing a document suite consisting of two dozen or so documents that are all interrelated. I was wondering whether there is a way that I can define a reference point for an entire document within a project and then refer to that from another document, like

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a definition

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 18:04 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4-3-2012 23:52, Kip Warner wrote: Hey list, I have a definition, like so... \startdefinition[definition:Foo]{Foo} Definition of foo here... \stopdefinition I'd like to reference it in the same way I would a section like

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a definition

On 4-3-2012 23:52, Kip Warner wrote: Hey list, I have a definition, like so... \startdefinition[definition:Foo]{Foo} Definition of foo here... \stopdefinition I'd like to reference it in the same way I would a section like \in{section}[Node]. How can I do the same with a definition such that

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a definition

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 18:04 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: \definedescription[test] \starttext \starttest[ward] {one} \input ward \stoptest bla bla \at{page}[ward] we define \about[ward] \stoptext Hey Hans. I think that might be a good workaround until I'm confident that that's the best

[NTG-context] Referencing a definition

Hey list, I have a definition, like so... \startdefinition[definition:Foo]{Foo} Definition of foo here... \stopdefinition I'd like to reference it in the same way I would a section like \in{section}[Node]. How can I do the same with a definition such that it will typeset a clickable section

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a \startdefinition

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 08:36 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: \startdefinition[des:some]{Some Definition} \stopdefinition \in{Definition}[des:some] Wolfgang Hey Wolfgang. That works, but in the text I would just see linkable text Definition which is fine for online viewing, but for print,

[NTG-context] Referencing a \startdefinition

Hey list, When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with \in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a \startdefinition{Some Definition}, how can I reference it inline? -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a \startdefinition

Hello, ** Kip Warner [2012-01-17 18:07:18 -0800]: Hey list, When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with \in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a \startdefinition{Some Definition}, how can I reference it inline? I could be wrong but from

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a \startdefinition

Am 18.01.2012 um 03:07 schrieb Kip Warner: Hey list, When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with \in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a \startdefinition{Some Definition}, how can I reference it inline? \startdefinition[des:some]{Some

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a \startdefinition

Am 18.01.2012 um 04:06 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: Hello, ** Kip Warner [2012-01-17 18:07:18 -0800]: Hey list, When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with \in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a \startdefinition{Some Definition}, how

[NTG-context] referencing

I have the following question about references. Using for example \at one can say somehting like see on \at{page}[ref] for the figure.. But when the figure is one the same page it seems a bit superfluous to reference to it. In the same manner it is a bit of an overkill to put a hyperlink to

Re: [NTG-context] referencing

Am 20.11.2011 um 18:46 schrieb Hans van der Meer: I have the following question about references. Using for example \at one can say somehting like see on \at{page}[ref] for the figure.. But when the figure is one the same page it seems a bit superfluous to reference to it. In the same

Re: [NTG-context] referencing

Thanks Wolfgang for the code. Just in case it is of use I concocted my variation on this theme. Now this simply replaces the \in, \at and \about macro's with one that does not show on the page where the link originates, but behaves as of old everywhere else. I introduced the unskip in order

Re: [NTG-context] referencing

Am 20.11.2011 um 21:26 schrieb Meer, H. van der: Thanks Wolfgang for the code. Just in case it is of use I concocted my variation on this theme. Now this simply replaces the \in, \at and \about macro's with one that does not show on the page where the link originates, but behaves as of

[NTG-context] Referencing bug

Hi Hans, Today I tried to makeup some text, wherein I need the referencing mechanism. It looks likely that the whole referencing mechanism is out of service Please refer to the attached test file. Kind regards Willi test-reference.tex Description: Binary data

[NTG-context] referencing position on page in index

Hi all, one of my favorite grammars contains rather elaborated indices: to a given entry they not only list the page numbers, but also the position on the respective page. To this end any page is subdivided into four regions to which the entries may refer separately. For instance, these

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing line numbers inside a typing

Am Dienstag 26 Oktober 2010, 21:12:01 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 26.10.2010 um 20:47 schrieb Stefan Müller: One more question before wikifying: Is there a way to prevent the prefix line? I want to say something like In lines 3 to 13. The texts „line“ and „lines“ are set with

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing line numbers inside a typing

Am Mittwoch 27 Oktober 2010, 16:52:07 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 27.10.2010 um 11:34 schrieb Stefan Müller: Thanks Wolgang, this looks pretty nice. Unfortunately I get the following error when running your example (ConTeXt ver: 2010.10.22 16:46 MKIV fmt: 2010.10.27 int:

[NTG-context] Referencing line numbers inside a typing

Hi list, is there a (preferably easy) way to reference line numbers inside a typing? Minimal (not working) example: \setuptyping[numbering=line] \starttext In the following typing, \in{line}{}[line:intyping] is really interesting. \starttyping This line is so interesting. \stoptyping

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing line numbers inside a typing

Am 26.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Stefan Müller: Hi list, is there a (preferably easy) way to reference line numbers inside a typing? Minimal (not working) example: \setuptyping[numbering=line] \starttext In the following typing, \in{line}{}[line:intyping] is really interesting.

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing line numbers inside a typing

On 26.10.2010 15:31, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 26.10.2010 um 10:30 schrieb Stefan Müller: Hi list, is there a (preferably easy) way to reference line numbers inside a typing? Minimal (not working) example: \setuptyping[numbering=line] \starttext In the following typing,

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing line numbers inside a typing

Am 26.10.2010 um 20:47 schrieb Stefan Müller: One more question before wikifying: Is there a way to prevent the prefix line? I want to say something like In lines 3 to 13. The texts „line“ and „lines“ are set with \setuplabeltext but you can see alternative texts with \inline{...}[ref].

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a Figure

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Troy Henderson wrote: I am trying to reference a figure, and the results are not as expected. Here is my snippet. \placefigure[fig:myfigure]{A beautiful circle}{ \startMPcode draw fullcircle scaled 72; \stopMPcode } Isn't Figure \in[fig:myfigure]

[NTG-context] Referencing a Figure

I am trying to reference a figure, and the results are not as expected. Here is my snippet. \placefigure[fig:myfigure]{A beautiful circle}{ \startMPcode draw fullcircle scaled 72; \stopMPcode } Isn't Figure \in[fig:myfigure] beautiful? When this code renders, the text says Isn't

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a Figure

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Troy Henderson wrote: I am trying to reference a figure, and the results are not as expected. Here is my snippet. \placefigure[fig:myfigure]{A beautiful circle}{ \placefigure[][fig:myfigure]{...}{...} \startMPcode draw fullcircle scaled 72; \stopMPcode }

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a Figure

Beautiful. Thanks. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage :

[NTG-context] Referencing...

Hi, I have small tabulations which contain references to footnotes in the header line. - The footnotes are placed correctly, how ever if I refer to the references I get in 2 out of the three cases ?? i.e. ConTeXt does not know the reference. I am puzzled because it works for the third

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing...

On 5-1-2010 14:46, Willi Egger wrote: Is there something changed in the approach in MKIV? sure, no common note code in mkii and mkiv fixed, Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

[NTG-context] Referencing Broken in MKIV?

From http://texshow.contextgarden.net/ (\reference): \starttext See page \ref[p][myref 1] and \ref[p][myref 2]. \page \reference[myref 1]{} This is the first reference. \page \reference[myref 2]{} This is the second one. \stoptext Works in MKII (at least on ConTeXt online), but produces the

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Broken in MKIV?

Tad Ashlock wrote: From http://texshow.contextgarden.net/ (\reference): \starttext See page \ref[p][myref 1] and \ref[p][myref 2]. \page \reference[myref 1]{} This is the first reference. \page \reference[myref 2]{} This is the second one. \stoptext Works in MKII (at least on ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing formulae

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Willi Egger wrote: Hi, Hm, it looks like that the referencing mechanism is broken: in context beta 2009-06-14 Luatex 0.40.5 \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2] \stopalign

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing formulae

Hi, Thanks Aditya for your reply, unfortunately I posted the wrong part of my example, where indeed the \placeformula was absent. I have to tell you that it does not work wit the \placeformula in place. Sorry. KR Willi On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 25 Jun

[NTG-context] Referencing formulae

Hi, Hm, it looks like that the referencing mechanism is broken: in context beta 2009-06-14 Luatex 0.40.5 \starttext \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[eq:1] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[eq:2] \stopalign \stopformula As seen from (\in[eq:1]) and (\in[eq:2]), referring

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I usually prefer Note that \in Step[fire] is optional for experienced chefs. This way, if you enable interaction, Step 3 will become a link, rather than just 3. An example showing a third alternative. This alternative is useful if you use that

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

Wow. How embarrassing - I am usually the one who chides my users about never actually trying simple experiments to see if something works. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

2008/4/30, Michael P. Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wow. How embarrassing - I am usually the one who chides my users about never actually trying simple experiments to see if something works. ___ If your question is

[NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

Is there some way to set up a reference tag so that I can refer to a particular item in a list, e.g., something vaguely like: You must do the following steps: \startitemize[n] \item Buy the ingredients \item Cook the food \item [??] Put out the fire \stopitemize Note that Step

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there some way to set up a reference tag so that I can refer to a particular item in a list, e.g., something vaguely like: \starttext You must do the following steps: \startitemize[n] \item Buy the ingredients \item Cook

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing Itemized Items?

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there some way to set up a reference tag so that I can refer to a particular item in a list, e.g., something vaguely like: You must do the following steps: \startitemize[n] \item Buy the ingredients \item Cook the food \item [??]

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

Hi, just to know, are there other suggestions? Best -a- On 16 Nov 2007, at 01:22, Andrea Valle wrote: Hi to all, the only thing I don't like in -TeX packages approach while writing is that I have to attach the footnotes to their indices. ConTeXt is so clever. Isn't there a way to store

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Andrea Valle wrote: Hi, just to know, are there other suggestions? There is a module by Guiseppe for epigrams. Maybe it is possible to adapt it for footnotes. Aditya ___ If your question is

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

Ah, thanks, I'll take a look (Where?). Now I'm tweaking with buffers Best -a- On 22 Nov 2007, at 14:20, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Andrea Valle wrote: Hi, just to know, are there other suggestions? There is a module by Guiseppe for epigrams. Maybe it is possible to

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Andrea Valle wrote: Ah, thanks, I'll take a look (Where?). http://modules.contextgarden.net/xdesc Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

(Ah well, I'm a recordman for typos...:-)) I was thinking too about the database approach, but a system of replacements would be enough for my needs. It would allow me to organize better the source files. OTOH for large projects this could get a bit unwieldy and unmanageable. Yes, that's

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

Hi Andrea, On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:22:09 -0700, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, the only thing I don't like in -TeX packages approach while writing is that I have to attach the footnotes to their indices. ConTeXt is so clever. Isn't there a way to store the footnotes in

[NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

Hi to all, the only thing I don't like in -TeX packages approach while writing is that I have to attach the footnotes to their indices. ConTeXt is so clever. Isn't there a way to store the footnotes in another place of the file (or in another file, that's the same) and referring to the in

Re: [NTG-context] referencing footnotes in another place

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:46:49 -0700, Idris Samawi Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Better in my view is to use an editor that supports folding, use a \start-stopfootnote macro, and fold them out of site when not needed UGH ...and fold them out of sight when not needed... Embarrassed, I --

Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

Thanks, this completely satisfies my curiosity. On Jun 26, 2007, at 7:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: 2007/6/25, Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:24, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hans van der Meer wrote: Taco and Wolfgang, Here is your counterexample:

Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

Hans van der Meer wrote: Taco and Wolfgang, Here is your counterexample: \setupcaptions[number=no] % the culprit \starttext Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I cannot say I am very surprised get weird output. The problem is that the reference is actually resolved, but it

Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:24, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hans van der Meer wrote: Taco and Wolfgang, Here is your counterexample: \setupcaptions[number=no] % the culprit \starttext Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I cannot say I am very surprised get weird output. You are

Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

2007/6/25, Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:24, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hans van der Meer wrote: Taco and Wolfgang, Here is your counterexample: \setupcaptions[number=no] % the culprit \starttext Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I

[NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way: \placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{\useMPgraphic{myfig}{parameters}} \in{figure}[fig:myfig] This however printed a dot instead of the expected figure #. Changing to \at{figure}[fig:myfig] again printed the correct

Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

Hoi Hans, Hans van der Meer wrote: I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way: \placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{\useMPgraphic{myfig}{parameters}} \in{figure}[fig:myfig] This however printed a dot instead of the expected figure #. This needs an example file

Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:38:34 +0200 Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way: \placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{\useMPgraphic{myfig}{parameters}} \in{figure}[fig:myfig] This however printed a dot instead of the

  1   2   >