I use a natural table to format my page header. I have another natural table in
the body. When the body's table is split onto the second page it interferes
with the formatting of the header's table, but only the header-table on the
first page. I've included an example. Run as-is, the header has
Am 21.05.2013 um 18:55 schrieb Stephens, Kenny ksteph...@hsutx.edu:
I use a natural table to format my page header. I have another natural table
in the body. When the body’s table is split onto the second page it
interferes with the formatting of the header’s table, but only the
From: ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl [ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] on behalf of
Wolfgang Schuster [schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:20 PM
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] split natural table
Am 21.05.2013
Am 22.05.2013 um 04:58 schrieb Stephens, Kenny ksteph...@hsutx.edu:
This fails for me. I commented my approach and replaced it with yours. Here
is what that section of the file now looks like:
%\define\syllabusheader{%
% \vskip0.1mm
% \bTABLE[frame=off,width=\textwidth]
%
Use the normal \framed command and replace \texsetup with \setups in
\setupheadertexts
and it will also work with your older version of context.
\startsetups[header]
\framed[corner=09,width=max,height=max,align={middle,low},foregroundstyle=\ss\bfb,offset=1ex]\bgroup
Johan Sandblom wrote:
What is missing from the example that started the thread?
Nothing, but I think it would be a waste of time. Instead of a one
column table (of this size) I would use
\startitemize[n,columns,three] or simply change the orientation of the
table and use column spanning
Good point, in the actual case there were two columns, a name and a
number. The reason for using the table is align the name to the left
and the number to the right. So a more realistic example is something
like
\starttext
\bTABLE
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][2][align=left]
Johan Sandblom wrote:
Good point, in the actual case there were two columns, a name and a
number. The reason for using the table is align the name to the left
and the number to the right. So a more realistic example is something
like
\starttext
\bTABLE
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
Peter Rolf wrote:
Johan Sandblom wrote:
Good point, in the actual case there were two columns, a name and a
number. The reason for using the table is align the name to the left
and the number to the right. So a more realistic example is something
like
\starttext
\bTABLE
Is it possible to make a natural table split over columns or columnsets?
For instance below I would like three cells in each column
\starttext
\startcolumns{3}
\placetable{}{
\bTABLE[split=repeat]
\dorecurse{9}{\bTR\bTD ha \eTD\eTR}
\eTABLE}
\stopcolumns
\stoptext
--
Johan Sandblom N8, MRC,
Johan Sandblom wrote:
Is it possible to make a natural table split over columns or columnsets?
For instance below I would like three cells in each column
\starttext
\startcolumns{3}
\placetable{}{
\bTABLE[split=repeat]
\dorecurse{9}{\bTR\bTD ha \eTD\eTR}
\eTABLE}
\stopcolumns
\stoptext
Hi Johan,
Johan Sandblom wrote:
Is it possible to make a natural table split over columns or columnsets?
see
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Tables_Overview
what is possible and what is not. Currently only *linetable* is
supporting horizontal splitting. The syntax looks similar to TABLE, but
I
Hi
But I don't understand why you want to split a table over columns. You
can reach this effect by using offsets (or empty columns if you use
backgrounds or frames), beside from the (in my eyes) strange look. And
how will you guarantee that a complete table line is horizontally
aligned
Hi Johan,
Johan Sandblom wrote:
Hi
But I don't understand why you want to split a table over columns. You
can reach this effect by using offsets (or empty columns if you use
backgrounds or frames), beside from the (in my eyes) strange look. And
how will you guarantee that a complete table
14 matches
Mail list logo
