Thank you Wolfgang!
This is what I needed.
Willi
> On 28 Mar 2024, at 17:56, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> Willi Egger schrieb am 28.03.2024 um 17:23:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I have a text, where a couple of lines are typeset with \underbar. — To me
Willi Egger schrieb am 28.03.2024 um 17:23:
Hello everybody,
I have a text, where a couple of lines are typeset with \underbar. — To me this
underbar is a fraction to near the text. So I wanted to use \setupbar[…] to
change the offset. Unfortunately nothing happens whatever I try.
MWE
Hello everybody,
I have a text, where a couple of lines are typeset with \underbar. — To me this
underbar is a fraction to near the text. So I wanted to use \setupbar[…] to
change the offset. Unfortunately nothing happens whatever I try.
MWE:
\setupbar[offset=-.5,dy=-.5]
\starttext
Hello
] [color=darkgreen,style=\underbar]
\defineinteraction[two] [color=darkred, style=\underbar]
\defineinteraction[three][color=darkblue, style=\underbar]
\def\inone#1{%
\start\setinteraction[one]%
\goto{#1}[url(#1)]\stop}
\def\intwo#1{%
\start\setinteraction[two]%
\goto{#1}[url(#1)]\stop
So clearly I would need to upgrade my version. It does not work with
what I have at the moment. Thank you.
Julian
On 22/9/23 02:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I get a line below the chapter title with LMTX and LuaTeX with the
current ConTeXt version.
jbf schrieb am 21.09.2023 um 07:01:
However, Wolfgang, if I do, e.g.
\setuphead[chapter][textcommand={\setbar[underbar]}]
\starttext
\startchapter[title={My title}]
\input ward
\stopchapter
\stoptext
Then I do not get My Title with underline, which is what I want, and nor
is anything
However, Wolfgang, if I do, e.g.
\setuphead[chapter][textcommand={\setbar[underbar]}]
\starttext
\startchapter[title={My title}]
\input ward
\stopchapter
\stoptext
Then I do not get My Title with underline, which is what I want, and nor
is anything else underlined in 'Ward'.
Could
jbf schrieb am 21.09.2023 um 05:03:
Am attempting to get an underlined head style (chapter) with:
\setuphead[chapter][textcommand=\underbar]
But I get no underline. Am I doing something wrong? I can, of course,
achieve the result at each chapter level with
\startchapter[title={\underbar
Am attempting to get an underlined head style (chapter) with:
\setuphead[chapter][textcommand=\underbar]
But I get no underline. Am I doing something wrong? I can, of course,
achieve the result at each chapter level with
\startchapter[title={\underbar{text}}] but would prefer to achieve
(and different linebreaking).
> >
> > \showglyphs
> >
> > \startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
> > \ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
>
at tug meetings on YT.
The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar
(and different linebreaking).
\showglyphs
\startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
\ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar
box{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$
a raised bar
(and different linebreaking).
\showglyphs
\startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
\ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:45 AM Jan Ulrich Hasecke via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Am Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:30:33AM +0200 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via
> ntg-context:
> > Now in node-rul.mkxl I have this:
> >
> > \protected\def\node_rules_direct#1%
> > {\groupedcommand
> > {\dontleavehmode %
Am Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:30:33AM +0200 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via
ntg-context:
> Now in node-rul.mkxl I have this:
>
> \protected\def\node_rules_direct#1%
> {\groupedcommand
> {\dontleavehmode % this should not be needed but it is in \bTD
> {\node_rules_set{#1}%
>
Am 31.08.22 um 08:54 schrieb Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 8:32 AM juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context
wrote:
Dear Hans,
thanks a lot, but...
Am 27.08.22 um 08:54 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
On 8/27/2022 8:46 AM, Jan Ulrich Hasecke via ntg-context
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 8:32 AM juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Dear Hans,
>
> thanks a lot, but...
>
> Am 27.08.22 um 08:54 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
> > On 8/27/2022 8:46 AM, Jan Ulrich Hasecke via ntg-context wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> can nobody confirm this
Dear Hans,
thanks a lot, but...
Am 27.08.22 um 08:54 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
On 8/27/2022 8:46 AM, Jan Ulrich Hasecke via ntg-context wrote:
Hi all,
can nobody confirm this bug?
in:
\protected\def\node_rules_direct#1%
{\groupedcommand
{\dontleavehmode % this should not
On 8/27/2022 8:46 AM, Jan Ulrich Hasecke via ntg-context wrote:
Hi all,
can nobody confirm this bug?
in:
\protected\def\node_rules_direct#1%
{\groupedcommand
{\dontleavehmode % this should not be needed but it is in \bTD
\node_rules_set{#1}%
add a % after that line and remake
Hi all,
can nobody confirm this bug?
juh
Am Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 09:19:40AM +0200 schrieb juh+ntg-context--- via
ntg-context:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I fear I hit a bug or missed a change.
>
> \starttext
> \underbar{First line}\\
> Second line.
> \stoptext
>
Dear all,
I fear I hit a bug or missed a change.
\starttext
\underbar{First line}\\
Second line.
\stoptext
With lmtx from 2022.07.24 the lines align fine.
With current lmtx the first line has a small indent.
Ciao!
juh
Am 05.08.22 um 11:52 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx that fixes a few math issues reported.
Thank you!
I could also remove the workaround for \underbar etc., still checking
other areas...
Hraban
Please consider the attached example – some of the “barring” macros are
defunct already for a while, some more within a TABLE:
\underbar works, but not in TABLE
\underbarsworks
\underdot doesn’t work
\underdotsdoesn’t work
\underdashdoesn’t work
\underdashes doesn’t work
tion
\starttext
Bla \RemovePreceding{Bla} Bla
Bla \RemoveFollowing{Bla} Bla
\stoptext
\starttexdefinition Italic #1
\emphasized{#1}
\autoinsertnextspace
\stoptexdefinition
\starttexdefinition Underbar #1
\underbar{#1}
\stoptexdefinition
\starttext
Bla Bla Bla
\Underb
, and thus being
able to configure them according to taste/need).
Q2: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar,
\underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please
raise your voice!
Here is a teaser:
\starttext
% in context we put digits in their own class, the next
: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar,
\underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please
raise your voice!
/Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
token which ensures there is
space when the next character is punctuation.
begin example
\starttexdefinition Italic #1
\emphasized{#1}
\autoinsertnextspace
\stoptexdefinition
\starttexdefinition Underbar #1
\underbar{#1}
\stoptexdefinition
\starttext
Bla Bla Bla
\Underbar{\Italic
\starttexdefinition Underbar #1
\underbar{#1}
\stoptexdefinition
\starttext
Bla Bla Bla
\Underbar{\Italic{Bla} , Bla Bla.}
\stoptext
end example
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others
xml:italic
\emph{\xmlflush{#1}}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:underline
\underbar{\xmlflush{#1}}
\stopxmlsetups
\startbuffer[test]
Bla Bla Bla
Bla
, Bla Bla.
\stopbuffer
\xmlprocessbuffer{test}{test}{}
%
How can I get rid off spurious
added that so one can nest the mp driven ones but still within the
same category ... i'll look into a mix (more complex management wise so
typically a rainy weekend thing; i know how to do it but ...)
If I use \overbar within \underbar, the same dy is used, i.e. in the
example, the first \overbar
]
\placeRussian
\stoptitle
\stoptext
Regarding the implementation: I've just tried it, and I wondered whether the
stacking of bars should not happen the other way round. As in
\underbar{\underdot{asdf}}
I would have expected the bar to be below the dot. But maybe that's wrong
expectations
round. As in
\underbar{\underdot{asdf}}
I would have expected the bar to be below the dot. But maybe that's wrong
expectations...
Denis
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ntg-context Im Auftrag von Hans Hagen
> via ntg-context
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2021 19:56
&
On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains both the
bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that
definition to align properly with any enclosing “underba
" that contains both the
bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that
definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I tried something like that a
while ago and basically gave up. I did not want to spend a whole of time on it so I just
told the c
les:under:bardots]
>
> and play with the mp until you are happy with the output.
>
> But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains
> both the bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite
> hard to get that definition to
ntains both
the bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to
get that definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I tried
something like that a while ago and basically gave up. I did not want to spend
a whole of time on it so I just told the client
’ll need different variants of underbars.
> >
> > - A normal underbar
> > - A dotted underbar
> > - A combination of both
> >
> > Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant
> above the normal bar.
>
> I would like to have
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars.
>
> - A normal underbar
> - A dotted underbar
> - A combination of both
>
> Is there a way to combine t
Hi,
for a current project I'll need different variants of underbars.
- A normal underbar
- A dotted underbar
- A combination of both
Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above
the normal bar.
This is not working
number, but neither achieve what I want. \underbar is
too close to the number
\setupbar[underbar][offset=-0.8] % play around with the number
and \crlf\blackrule too far below. So basically
my question is: is there a way of adjusting the position of a brief rule
beneath the number?
\defineframed
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, jbf via ntg-context wrote:
> The following MWE deliberately shows two ways of getting a short rule
> beneath a chapter number, but neither achieve what I want. \underbar is
> too close to the number
\setupbar[underbar][offset=-0.8] % play around with t
The following MWE deliberately shows two ways of getting a short rule
beneath a chapter number, but neither achieve what I want. \underbar is
too close to the number and \crlf\blackrule too far below. So basically
my question is: is there a way of adjusting the position of a brief rule
beneath
On 3/10/2021 2:06 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
Hi, list. The following works well in LMTX, but it applies underlining
to the next dash sign when compiled with MkIV:
\starttext
%\overbar{foo}-bar
\underbar{foo}-bar
\stoptext
I've found a workaround for it, but I want to know about
Hi, list. The following works well in LMTX, but it applies underlining to
the next dash sign when compiled with MkIV:
\starttext
%\overbar{foo}-bar
\underbar{foo}-bar
\stoptext
I've found a workaround for it, but I want to know about the reason for
such a strange behavior. Thanks beforehand
> Am 14.01.2021 um 21:48 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm :
>
>
>
>> Am 14.01.2021 um 16:58 schrieb Alan Bowen :
>>
>> The mwe
>>
>> \starttext
>> \setupcolors[state=stop]
>> {\darkred Test}
>>
>> \underbar{Here}
>> \sto
> Am 14.01.2021 um 16:58 schrieb Alan Bowen :
>
> The mwe
>
> \starttext
> \setupcolors[state=stop]
> {\darkred Test}
>
> \underbar{Here}
> \stoptext
>
> fails: “Here” does not appear above the underbar (which has the correct
> length).
>
> W
The mwe
\starttext
\setupcolors[state=stop]
{\darkred Test}
\underbar{Here}
\stoptext
fails: “Here” does not appear above the underbar (which has the correct
length).
When \setupcolors[state=stop] is commented out, the file runs as it should.
Alan
> On 24 Nov 2020, at 22:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Bruce Horrocks wrote:
>
>> The following is giving me a section title with triple underbars instead of
>> single.
>>
>> \definehead [Heading] [section]
>> \setuphead
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Bruce Horrocks wrote:
> The following is giving me a section title with triple underbars instead of
> single.
>
> \definehead [Heading] [section]
> \setuphead [Heading] [style={\underbar}]
Change this to:
\setuphead [Heading] [textcommand={\underbar}
The following is giving me a section title with triple underbars instead of
single.
\definehead [Heading] [section]
\setuphead [Heading] [style={\underbar}]
\starttext
\Heading{First level section heading}
\underbar{This is single underlined as expected}
\stoptext
(Same with \startHeading
>
> \setupbar[color=red,rulethickness=.3,offset=0.5]
According to https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/underbar, offset should
work.
Maybe \definebar behaves different to \setupbar
Hraban
___
If your question is
string works as advertised.
Regards
dh
start of contxt source
\definesymbol[5][$\diamond$]
\starttext
\setupitemgroup[itemize][each][packed][before=\underbar{mae-da
},after=\underbar{ato-da}] % WORKS
\setupitemgroup[itemize][each][ ][symbol=5
dh
start of contxt source
\definesymbol[5][$\diamond$]
\starttext
\setupitemgroup[itemize][each][packed][before=\underbar{mae-da
},after=\underbar{ato-da}] % WORKS
\setupitemgroup[itemize][each][ ][symbol=5]%
WORKS
=yes]
Here is the start of the paragraph
{\tacobar hello! ({\tacoover this} looks fine)}
and some extra text running on to the next line
%%%
Because the \tacoover makes the \tacobar disappear :(
If the text has constant interline spacing, you can try to mimick the old
(mkii) underbar mechanism
underlining and uppercasing :(
Have you tried \underbar{\input ward\endgraf}?
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http
c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d
Rik Kabel schrieb am 04.10.18 um 00:01:
List,
With recent betas, since a fix for tagged elements in tables, underbar
processing seems to have changed (or perhaps I just noticed it after
that fix).
Previously, the following highlight definition worked for both pdf and
export outputs
List,
With recent betas, since a fix for tagged elements in tables, underbar
processing seems to have changed (or perhaps I just noticed it after
that fix).
Previously, the following highlight definition worked for both pdf and
export outputs:
\definehighlight [Term][style={{\underbar
{a+b+c+d} \quad
53 \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
54 $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
55 \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
56 $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
57 \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
58 $\overbar
k
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\o
underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
Bump. Even a simple yes/no answer would be nice. Is this behaviour intended?
Am 2017-03-29 um 17:03 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm <te...@fiee.net>:
> Ahoi,
>
> I played with the "bar" commands:
>
> \underbar{underlined \underbar{more and \underbar{more}
> \ov
Ahoi,
I played with the "bar" commands:
\underbar{underlined \underbar{more and \underbar{more} \overbar{\underbar{and}
\overbar{over}} and back}}
While stacking bars is nice, overbar and underbar exclude each other, while
underbar takes precedence. Is this intended? I expected
Florian Leupold <mailto:fleup...@posteo.net>
19. Oktober 2016 um 14:51
Dear list,
how can I clone \underbar (for the purpose of changing settings for
the clone afterwards)?
Just using \definebar to inherit \underbar’s properties does not
entirely work, see MWE:
\definebar[myBar][un
Dear list,
how can I clone \underbar (for the purpose of changing settings for the clone
afterwards)?
Just using \definebar to inherit \underbar’s properties does not entirely work,
see MWE:
\definebar[myBar][underbar]
\starttext
underbar text mode: \underbar{$a^b$}\crlf
underbar
Hi,
Maybe you should use rather
$\underbar{F_C=\unit{1e2 newton}}$ or \underbar{\unit{1e2 newton}}
since otherwise \underbar considers each character in the math formula as a
word, which should be underlined separately.
Best regards: OK
> On 5 Oct 2016, at 22:01, Florian Leup
Dear list,
underbar behaves weirdly when it comes to indexes, exponents, and units:
\starttext
\underbar{$F_C=\unit{1e2 newton}$} or \underbar{\unit{1e2 newton}}
\stoptext
Am I doing something wrong? Is there maybe a setting to correct for this?
Thanks,
Florian
signature.asc
Description
On 9/14/2016 4:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9/14/2016 2:33 PM, Florian Leupold wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to create cloze texts with solutions, but I have problems
with horizontal spaces above the underbar, namely:
1) After a linebreak, horizontal space is cut off despite the \zwj.
2) I
On 9/14/2016 2:33 PM, Florian Leupold wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to create cloze texts with solutions, but I have problems with
horizontal spaces above the underbar, namely:
1) After a linebreak, horizontal space is cut off despite the \zwj.
2) I cannot find a way of scaling the leading
Dear all,
I would like to create cloze texts with solutions, but I have problems with
horizontal spaces above the underbar, namely:
1) After a linebreak, horizontal space is cut off despite the \zwj.
2) I cannot find a way of scaling the leading and trailing space to equal 0.2
times the width
Florian Leupold <mailto:fleup...@posteo.net>
8. September 2016 um 13:49
Dear list,
I would like to report a bug: When \underbar is used for the first
word of a paragraph in conjunction with \placefigure[right], the text
overwrites the figure.
MNWE:
\setupexternalfigures[order={pdf,p
Dear list,
I would like to report a bug: When \underbar is used for the first word of a
paragraph in conjunction with \placefigure[right], the text overwrites the
figure.
MNWE:
\setupexternalfigures[order={pdf,png,jpg}, location={local,global,default}]
\starttext
\placefigure[right, none
> On 04.09.16, at 16:28, Florian Leupold <fleup...@posteo.net> wrote:
>
>
>> On 04.09.16, at 14:14, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/4/2016 12:03 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> \definebar[ClozedBar][underbar][continue=yes]
&
> On 04.09.16, at 14:14, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>
> On 9/4/2016 12:03 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> \definebar[ClozedBar][underbar][continue=yes]
>>
>> \unexpanded\def\Clozed#1{\ClozedBar{\zwj#1\zwj}}
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>>
On 9/4/2016 12:03 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
\definebar[ClozedBar][underbar][continue=yes]
\unexpanded\def\Clozed#1{\ClozedBar{\zwj#1\zwj}}
\starttext
\input ward
\Clozed{\color[red]{CLOZE 1}}
\input ward
\Clozed{\quad\color[red]{CLOZE 2}\quad}
\input ward
\Clozed{\color[white]{x}\quad\color[red
in the teacher’s version.
The macro \underbar does a good job in terms of line breaks and hyphenation. But it is
"too smart" in the sense that it does not underline horizontal spaces. The MNWE
below showcases problems with my naive attempts to achieve underlining:
- CLOZE 1 does no
\underbar does a good job in terms of line breaks and hyphenation.
But it is "too smart" in the sense that it does not underline horizontal
spaces. The MNWE below showcases problems with my naive attempts to achieve
underlining:
- CLOZE 1 does not have any extra space.
- CLOZE 2 does not
{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a
\quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
\stoptext
Wo
> \setupmathstackers
> [top]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [bottom]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \starttext
>
> $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underb
d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+
On 26 May 2016 at 18:17, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 5/26/2016 2:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> Nevertheless this doesn't entirely solve the problem. I now have a
>> problem with the following:
>>
>> \catcode`č=\active
>> \defč{\buildtextaccent\textcaron c}
>
>
> doesn't the compose=yes
On 5/26/2016 2:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 25 May 2016 at 17:35, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
With \shiftup the line under the raised text stays at the same position.
\starttext
\underbar{Test this \shiftup{®}}
\stoptext
When has \shiftup been implemented?
It doesn't work in TeX Live
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\catcode`č=\active
\defč{\buildtextaccent\textcaron c}
Instead of creating an active character, does this work:
\definefontfeature
[default]
[default]
[compose=yes]
On Thu, 26 May 2016 14:48:00 +0200
Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 May 2016 at 17:35, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> >
> > With \shiftup the line under the raised text stays at the same
> > position.
> >
> > \starttext
> > \
On 25 May 2016 at 17:35, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> With \shiftup the line under the raised text stays at the same position.
>
> \starttext
> \underbar{Test this \shiftup{®}}
> \stoptext
When has \shiftup been implemented?
It doesn't work in TeX Live (or maybe I f
Hans Hagen <mailto:pra...@wxs.nl>
24. Mai 2016 um 14:19
On 5/24/2016 1:54 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a continuous underbar under a paragraph or a
title as in:
\setupbar
[color=red,offset=10pt]
\starttext
\underbar{Test this \high{\tfxx ®}}
\stoptext
... b
On 5/24/2016 1:54 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a continuous underbar under a paragraph or a title as in:
\setupbar
[color=red,offset=10pt]
\starttext
\underbar{Test this \high{\tfxx ®}}
\stoptext
... but I'm confused about two aspects:
- How can I prevent \high
Hi,
I would like to add a continuous underbar under a paragraph or a title as in:
\setupbar
[color=red,offset=10pt]
\starttext
\underbar{Test this \high{\tfxx ®}}
\stoptext
... but I'm confused about two aspects:
- How can I prevent \high{} from shifting the underbar?
- How can I add more
On 2/15/2016 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
| \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
i uploaded a beta where you can test:
test {\red
On 2/15/2016 10:31 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
| \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
i uploaded a beta where you can test:
test {\red
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
| \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
i uploaded a beta where you can test:
test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
| \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
i uploaded a beta where you can test:
test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test
needed a name and it's kind of random
Best regards: OK
On 15 Feb 2016, at 10:39, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
|\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
i uploaded
gt; wrote:
>
> On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
>> I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
>> |\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
>
> i uploaded a beta where you can test:
>
> test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrando
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
|\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
i uploaded a beta where you can test:
test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or
\underrandom{grep} \blank
test {\red
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
|\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?
not yet (but one can use inline text backgrounds to achieve this)
i'm playing with some extensions to the underbar code but it might take
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the
\defineunderbarmechanism.
Is that possible?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context
s
> of the assumed correspondence between notes and numbers. Compare the more
> precise statement occurring on the second line of the first paragraph:
> «{τοὺϲ φθόγγουϲ ἀναγκαῖον ἐν ἀριθμοῦ λόγῳ λέγεϲθαι πρὸϲ ἀλλήλουϲ}».}
> %
> \Lmt{M160.1}φθόγγουϲ, ἐπειδὴ μίαν τὴν ἐξ ἀμφοῖν
ρὸϲ ἀλλήλουϲ}».}
%
\Lmt{M160.1}φθόγγουϲ, ἐπειδὴ μίαν τὴν ἐξ ἀμφοῖν ποιοῦνται κρᾶϲιν
τῆϲ φωνῆϲ, εἶναι \underbar{τῶν ἐν ἑνὶ ὀνόματι πρὸϲ ἀλλήλουϲ
λεγομένων ἀριθμῶν},\note[04] ἤτοι πολλαπλαϲίουϲ ὄνταϲ ἢ ἐπι{-}
%
\footnotetext[04]{The {\emph variatio} «({ἐν}) {ἑνὶ ὀνόματι}» is very
likely a scribal {
1 - 100 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
