gt; relevant, although they push RRAS.
>
> For example, WIP doesn't work properly with DA. Only with AVPN.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>
> Sent: Monday, November
...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew S. Baker
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 3:37 PM
To: ntsysadm
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
I'm glad I didn't spend too much time on DirectAccess...
Regards,
ASB
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Michael B
e-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 8:19 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for
> input
>
> Arg - that should be
Correct
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:23 PM Kurt Buff wrote:
> So, it's not used to configure load balancing or client redirection
> for GP? OK, I can see that.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> > Panorama is only a MGMT tool for
So, it's not used to configure load balancing or client redirection
for GP? OK, I can see that.
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> Panorama is only a MGMT tool for the firewalls. It has nothing to do with
> traffic mgmt
>
> On Nov 14, 2017 17:25, "Kurt
>>>
>>> Instead you need to be using their Automatic VPN. The endpoint isn't very
>>> relevant, although they push RRAS.
>>>
>>> For example, WIP doesn't work properly with DA. Only with AVPN.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
Panorama is only a MGMT tool for the firewalls. It has nothing to do with
traffic mgmt
On Nov 14, 2017 17:25, "Kurt Buff" wrote:
> I presume this requires Panorama? We don't have that, I've been
> wanting it for a while, but it's been hard to justify when we have
> only 3
; capability within 5 years.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:31 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for
Sure it can, DNS RR or some kind of GTM
As for cloud, PA does GP in the cloud. Scales up and down as needed...
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:35 PM Kurt Buff wrote:
> Perhaps I missed it, but I didn't see that GP will autoconnect to the
> closest/fastest site.
>
> That doesn't
ush RRAS.
>
> For example, WIP doesn't work properly with DA. Only with AVPN.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 8:19 PM
> To: ntsysadm
>
Perhaps I missed it, but I didn't see that GP will autoconnect to the
closest/fastest site.
That doesn't mean GP is out of the running - I like it where I've set
it up, so it's on my list, especially since all of our sites have Palo
Altos already.
But, from the way the questions were put to me,
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
The 2.0.0.0 is the module version of VpnClient.
On Windows 10, Add-VpnConnectionRoute doesn’t require admin privs.
Add-VpnConnection also allows you to specify SplitTunneling when you create
n Behalf Of Melvin Backus
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:45 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
Multiple articles during my initial, but granted brief, research indi
...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:16 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
That was true prior to 1703, unless you wrote your own packager. It isn't any
longer.
The AVPN
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
Multiple articles during my initial, but granted brief, research indicated one
of those were required. Not having any exposure to it I reverted to my trusted
source, the list, to confirm or debunk
)_/¯
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 10:47 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
AVPN
On
Behalf Of Melvin Backus
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:41 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
Can you elaborate on the 2016 functionality issues?
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those w
Backus
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:41 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
Can you elaborate on the 2016 functionality issues?
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those who understand binary
14, 2017 6:41 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
Can you elaborate on the 2016 functionality issues?
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those who understand binary and those who don
. Smith
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 9:08 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking for input
So just a data point to consider.
Microsoft is kinda moving away from DirectAccess.
Many of the security functionalities added
+1
or Sonicwall Golbal VPN. Either way, I'd go hardware and away from
Microsoft.
--
Espi
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> Why can't Global Protect achieve all of your needs? Did I miss some
> requirement they can't meet?
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:25
doesn't work properly with DA. Only with AVPN.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 8:19 PM
To: ntsysadm
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Looking for a global VPN solution - looking
Why can't Global Protect achieve all of your needs? Did I miss some
requirement they can't meet?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:25 PM Kurt Buff wrote:
> Arg - that should be "seeking commercial services"..
>
> And, once I bring recommendations, it might well be that we just
Arg - that should be "seeking commercial services"..
And, once I bring recommendations, it might well be that we just fall
back to a DirectAccess server in each office, with our without a
multi-site configuration, potentially with an SSP VPN appliance also
at each office for backup and
24 matches
Mail list logo