RE: [NTSysADM] Ransonware protection

Malwarebytes for Business version 3 on clients. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Tom Miller Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:35 AM To: NTSysADM@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] Ransonware protection Hi All, What would you recommend

Re: [NTSysADM] Test

30, 2017 17:45 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Test Hi Katherine, I've been getting your emails via the list again. Were you able to determine what the problem was? -- Espi On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Katherine M. Moss <km...@winterhillsolution

RE: [EXTERNAL]Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Test

imcu.com<mailto:dav...@imcu.com>> wrote: Only a test? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:41 AM To:

[NTSysADM] Test

This is a test.

[NTSysADM] RE: Test

: Test Only a test? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:41 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [NT

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

o Windows Shell... Core can run most (not all, but most) server loads. Nano is a VERY restricted version of server. It cannot run most server loads. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June

Re: [NTSysADM] Windows Storage Spaces VS. RAID

F9D6 A549 8842 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Katherine M. Moss <km...@winterhillsolutions.com<mailto:km...@winterhillsolutions.com>> wrote: Hi all, I'm looking for some open minded folks on here who can possibly provide validation for both sides of this argument. I tend to prefer st

[NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue

: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue They should be recreated for the proper contents of the new profile. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1,

[NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue

istsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:47 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue In light of the advice you guys provided yesterday, I deleted ev

RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

people who refused to adapt, this is technology we must learn. Nano is new but Core has been around since Server 2008. I would not call that new. -Matt -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent

RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

Server Core/NanoServer over Linux? It's also a push to start implementing PAWs - Protected Access Workstations - which is how I'm going to configure my next machine. Kurt On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Katherine M. Moss <km...@winterhillsolutions.com> wrote: > I prefer remote manag

[NTSysADM] RE: Windows 10 Explorer drag and drop issue

I've noticed it's more Windows 10 than older versions. I seriously wonder whether this was done on purpose ... From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of James Rankin Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 12:23 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject:

RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

ailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:34 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux? Hey all, Just had to ask this one.

[NTSysADM] RE: Windows 10 Explorer drag and drop issue

give consumers a warm fuzzy feeling :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: 02 June 2017 18:12 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>

Re: [NTSysADM] RE: What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

can run IIS on core. DAMIEN SOLODOW IT Engineering Lead 317.447.6033 (office) HARRISON COLLEGE From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:34 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NT

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

om [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:34 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux? Hey all, Just had to ask this one. I’m really curious because I’ve heard the argument

RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

ccess Workstations: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/securing-privileged-access/privileged-access-workstations https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Privileged-Access-53a4673a Kurt On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Katherine M. Moss <km...@winterhillsolutions.com>

RE: [NTSysADM] Windows Storage Spaces VS. RAID

com> 425-205-9047 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Katherine M. Moss <km...@winterhillsolutions.com<mailto:km...@winterhillsolutions.com>> wrote: Thanks for that. I will definitely keep you guys updated. Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/> ___

[NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer over Linux?

Hey all, Just had to ask this one. I'm really curious because I've heard the argument, well, if you're going to run server Core, why not just use linux? What can you say to make the conversation worthwhile and not just arguing preferences? Or is that really what it's all about these days? Iv'e

[NTSysADM] RE: cloud service (VDI)

I think it all depends on their level of comfort with having a third party manage everything for them. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of J- P Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:10 PM To: NT Subject: [NTSysADM]

[NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue

m] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 7:46 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue Now why did this not happen on my spare D630? And why did the D630 not hang on cr

[NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue

They should be recreated for the proper contents of the new profile. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 9:25 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitfor

[NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue

ilto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 9:51 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue Now why did this not happen on my spare D630? And why did

[NTSysADM] RE: Nasty Outlook 2016 and Windows 10 issue

files (put them in a different folder). They are used by Outlook 2016 to build the profile instead of the PRF files that prior versions of Outlook used. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kathe

[NTSysADM] Windows Storage Spaces VS. RAID

Hi all, I'm looking for some open minded folks on here who can possibly provide validation for both sides of this argument. I tend to prefer storage spaces simply because they are so simple to configure and they don't require a set of eyes to read BIOS screens. I know some people on the other