Re: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-09 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Andrew Levicki and...@levicki.me.uk wrote: My concern is this: how can the chkdsk software repair a physical disk subsystem? It doesn't. CHKDSK works at the filesystem level. It validates filesystem metadata (like directory entries, allocation extents,

Re: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-07 Thread Steven Peck
To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Chkdsk on RAID 5 On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:41 AM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: Is it safe to run chkdsk /f on a RAID 5 array?  It's no more or less safe than running it on a single disk.  (Which is to say: The filesystem

RE: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
...@levicki.me.uk] Sent: Saturday, 8 May 2010 11:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Chkdsk on RAID 5 Hi John, Do you have any feedback for us on how this went, please? I've been puzzling over the issue of running chkdsk on RAID arrays and have done a little research but I cannot find

RE: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-05 Thread John Hornbuckle
It's hardware-based, so I think it'll be safe. My logic is the same as yours-I just wanted to be sure it wasn't flawed... From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 9:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Chkdsk on RAID 5 I expected to see a bunch

Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-05 Thread John Hornbuckle
processed) 2953600 file records processed. File verification completed. 832 large file records processed. Errors found. CHKDSK cannot continue in read-only mode. Is it safe to run chkdsk /f on a RAID 5 array? Not chkdsk /r-I know I don't want chkdsk looking for bad sectors. But is the /f parameter

RE: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-05 Thread David Lum
Let it rip. From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 6:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Chkdsk on RAID 5 It's hardware-based, so I think it'll be safe. My logic is the same as yours-I just wanted to be sure it wasn't flawed

Re: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-05 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:41 AM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote: Is it safe to run chkdsk /f on a RAID 5 array? It's no more or less safe than running it on a single disk. (Which is to say: The filesystem is already damaged. You've probabbly already lost data.

RE: Chkdsk on RAID 5

2010-05-05 Thread John Hornbuckle
for the possibility that it will make things worse. John -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 11:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Chkdsk on RAID 5 On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:41 AM, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc