Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-15 Thread mark florisson
On 14 May 2012 21:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no  wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-15 Thread mark florisson
On 14 May 2012 21:54, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-15 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/15/2012 12:42 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 14 May 2012 21:36, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-15 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.com wrote: I assumed as much, in any case I was going to start with dense arrays, simply because they are in common use and well-defined at this point. Maybe what we really want is just lazy evaluation that works for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-15 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/13/2012 12:27 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-14 Thread mark florisson
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no  wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-14 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-14 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/14/2012 10:36 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 05/14/2012 06:31 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-14 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.comwrote: On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/11/2012 10:10 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/11/2012 03:25 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not going to be without

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/12/2012 11:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:25 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not going to be without

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Your thoughts are definitely the future.   We are currently building such a thing.   We would like it to be open source.    We are currently preparing a proposal to DARPA as part of their XDATA proposal in order

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Travis Oliphant
On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Your thoughts are definitely the future. We are currently building such a thing. We would like it to be open source.We are currently preparing a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Your thoughts are definitely the future.   We are currently building such a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-12 Thread Travis Oliphant
On May 12, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote: Your thoughts are

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-11 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 05/11/2012 01:13 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not going to be without manpower; and as his mentor I'd pitch in too here and there.) (Mark

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-11 Thread mark florisson
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not going to be without manpower; and as his mentor I'd pitch in too

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-11 Thread mark florisson
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not going to be without manpower; and as his mentor I'd pitch in too

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not going to be without manpower; and as his mentor I'd

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fixing issue of future opaqueness of ndarray this summer

2012-05-11 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, mark florisson markflorisso...@gmail.comwrote: On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F.