Ah, I missed the checkin message on that! Thank you!
-Brian
On Apr 13, 2004, at 5:20 PM, Oleg Nitz wrote:
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 15:17, Brian McCallister wrote:
Huh, the ODMG slower thing is interesting as Armin just reemed us all
out for letting the OTM get so much slower than ODMG ;-)
Have
On Wednesday 14 April 2004 15:51, Brian McCallister wrote:
Have I missed something? Are there any new performance tests?
Armin emailed the -dev list a few days back =)
What was the subject? Still can't find.
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi Oleg,
try this
[OTM] Massive performance decrease between Feb and Apr version
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=6875
regards,
Armin
Oleg Nitz wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2004 15:51, Brian McCallister wrote:
Have I missed something? Are there any new performance
From my experience of using both (i ended up doing an ODMG - OTM
conversion!):
Note that i dont any of the more complicated stuff - just storing object
trees, collections, etc, and querying the database. Also i dont use locking
atall (one thing odmg does better i believe).
Go with OTM.
ODMG
Huh, the ODMG slower thing is interesting as Armin just reemed us all
out for letting the OTM get so much slower than ODMG ;-)
Right now there are a couple hidden nasties in the OTM -- I like the
OTM a lot (if just so that I can do a query by identity without casting
to a TransactionImpl) but
directly. (that was what i was
refering to with regards to speed)
And a little OTM when i need locking for administrative tasks.
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Brian McCallister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 April 2004 13:17
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Newbie Question : OTM
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 15:17, Brian McCallister wrote:
Huh, the ODMG slower thing is interesting as Armin just reemed us all
out for letting the OTM get so much slower than ODMG ;-)
Have I missed something? Are there any new performance tests?
When I tested last time, OTM was somewhat faster.
