Hi Dmitry,
I don't know what's going wrong when running the tutorial (seems that
Product.class was correctly enhanced by the JDO enhancer).
But I wouldn't recommend OJB's JDO 1.0-api implementation for production
environments.
The PB-api and ODMG-api are stable and ready for production use
Thank you Armin,
Please educate me a bit, cause I am a bit perplexed by your mail.
You say OJB does not work well w/ JDO, use ODMG or PB
OK, I understand that.
then you say:
If you want to use JDO, please have a look at JPOX or Speedo (or other
JPOX is a implementation of JDO, isn't it?
Dmitry Litvintsev wrote:
Thank you Armin,
Please educate me a bit, cause I am a bit perplexed by your mail.
You say OJB does not work well w/ JDO, use ODMG or PB
OK, I understand that.
then you say:
If you want to use JDO, please have a look at JPOX or Speedo (or other
JPOX is a
Dmitry Litvintsev escribió:
Thank you Armin,
Please educate me a bit, cause I am a bit perplexed by your mail.
You say OJB does not work well w/ JDO, use ODMG or PB
OK, I understand that.
then you say:
If you want to use JDO, please have a look at JPOX or Speedo (or other
Hi,
I am developing a java application and I am considering OJB technology to
store objects' states seamlessly in the PostgreSQL database.
In short I am failing to get tutorial5 up and running. I followed
instructions on this link:
Hello,
i am using the Persistence-Broker API and a mySQL-Database. My Server-Application
holds persistent Objects in the following way:
I have a Container-Object called ProductCon, which holds n Product-Objects in a
Vector. I have made this struct persistent using
a 1:n mapping and it works
Philipp, this appears to be the same problem/question asked by another
posting last night. Here's the response I sent to that request:
I'll try to answer your question, although I'm still somewhat new to OJB
myself.
OJB uses RemovalAwareCollection as the default implementation class for
