Hi,
I would like to join two table, and they are in 1:n relation, and they have
a field with same name. If
I add a criteria to this, I get an exception. This exception says,
that the field is _ambiguous_.
I've logged the SQL query with P6Spy, and it is true, the name of the field
appears in the
Hello,
I'm using OJB 1.0 rc4 inside of jboss3.2.2rc3 and db2.
OJB is running into self generated deadlocks if I access ojb with
concurrent ejb clients when using SequenceManagerNextValImpl
As a workaround I use SequenceManagerInMemoryImpl but I think this won't
work with sequences.
If ojb could
Hi Guido,
Hello,
I'm using OJB 1.0 rc4 inside of jboss3.2.2rc3 and db2.
OJB is running into self generated deadlocks if I access ojb with
concurrent ejb clients when using SequenceManagerNextValImpl
As a workaround I use SequenceManagerInMemoryImpl but I think this
won't
work with
Hello!
I'm interested in xdoclet-ojb module status. I've tried to use it and was a
little bit confused due to a set of errors.
Environment I used:
xdoclet-ojb-module-1.2b3-dev.jar
torque-3.0.2.jar
MsAccess 2002
The goal of my investigations was to reside xdoclet-ojb tags in java source
code,
I would like to know if it's possible to order the elements retrieved inside
a collection reference.If the question is not clear, that's my problem:
I have the following code:
Query query = new QueryByCriteria(Utr.class, null);
_broker.beginTransaction();
Collection allUtr = (Collection)
Hi Armin,
Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi Guido,
Hello,
I'm using OJB 1.0 rc4 inside of jboss3.2.2rc3 and db2.
OJB is running into self generated deadlocks if I access ojb with
concurrent ejb clients when using SequenceManagerNextValImpl
As a workaround I use SequenceManagerInMemoryImpl but I think
Sebastien Cesbron wrote:
Am I the only one that have this problem ?
No :-)
Can anybody tell me what I can do in this situation ?
I removed hashCode() and waited for a wise suggestion,
what to do :-)
--
Christian
-
To
Sorry,I'm using OJB 1.0rc3.
- Original Message -
From: Duma Rolando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:35 PM
Subject: OrderBy on m:n relationship
I would like to know if it's possible to order the elements retrieved
inside
a
Hello
I've got a problem with collection descriptors and interfaces. My class
hierarchy is something like this :
class-descriptor class=package.interfaces.InterfaceEntity
extent-class class-ref=package.interfaces.InterfacePlace /
extent-class
Sorry again for the post, I found an orderby attribute for the
collection-descriptor tag.
- Original Message -
From: Duma Rolando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: OrderBy on m:n relationship
Sorry,I'm using
Hi Edson,
[snip]
When I execute this command, I'm expecting that OJB will issue
select max(nu_ordem) from
(select nu_ordem from tb_compttpessoa_taxa
union
select nu_ordem from tb_compttpessoa_percent
union
select nu_ordem from tb_compttpessoa_script )
that works fine in
The xdoclet ojb module is intended to produce the repository and torque
schemas from javadoc tags (your first step).
In your second step the problem is that the torque folks decided to
include the version number in the names of newer dtd versions which of
course breaks older table schemas (which
I think UNION is not a problem, but using a SELECT in a FROM clause could be.
In any way, I've changed my code to expect more than one value when issuing max() in
areas I have extents.
Thanks,
Edson Richter
- Original Message -
From: Charles Anthony
To: 'OJB Users List'
Hi Edson!
The simplest way to do this is to set the date in your value-object. Eg setMyDate(new
Date()); and then store the object. Since most databases I tested support higher
time-resolutions than whole seconds or in your case (guessing oracle) 1/10 of a second
if I remember correctly it
Never mind. Stupid user error.
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Norby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Optimistic Locking Problem
We are using 1.0.rc4.
It seems as though the optimistic locking attributes (integer) are
About secure messages, you are right. Excuses to mail list users.
About using new Date(), this works fine if my app is j2ee based (like
JSP, web services and so on), but my app is Swing (by now client-server)
based, and I need to guarantee that workstation (if I use new Date())
has date/time
Hi Edson!
I think you should be able to use QueryBySQL to solve the problem. It
doesn't require you to return a key. But I'm not sure that will work... i
know I can create an object of an already existing mapped class... but i'm
not sure if it works for this purpose. If you have the time to make
17 matches
Mail list logo